Deep Learning–Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Classify Tremors from Hand‐Drawn Spirals

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Reghu Anandapadmanabhan, Aayushi Vishnoi, Geetha Raman, Jeena Thachan, Beulah Amulyavathi Gangaraju, Divya Radhakrishnan, Venugopalan Yamuna Vishnu, Nitish Kamble, Vikram Holla, Praveen James, Achal Srivastava, Deepak Joshi, Ashish Mahabal, Syam Krishnan, Pramod Pal, Roopa Rajan
{"title":"Deep Learning–Based Artificial Intelligence Algorithm to Classify Tremors from Hand‐Drawn Spirals","authors":"Reghu Anandapadmanabhan, Aayushi Vishnoi, Geetha Raman, Jeena Thachan, Beulah Amulyavathi Gangaraju, Divya Radhakrishnan, Venugopalan Yamuna Vishnu, Nitish Kamble, Vikram Holla, Praveen James, Achal Srivastava, Deepak Joshi, Ashish Mahabal, Syam Krishnan, Pramod Pal, Roopa Rajan","doi":"10.1002/mds.30176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundNo objective biomarkers exist for diagnosing and classifying tremor syndromes.ObjectiveThe aim was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm for classifying tremors from hand‐drawn pen‐on‐paper spirals.MethodsWe recruited participants with dystonic tremor (DT), essential tremor (ET), essential tremor plus (ETP), Parkinson's disease (PD), cerebellar ataxia (AT), and healthy volunteers (HV). Participants drew free‐hand spirals on paper, which were used to train a DL algorithm based on transfer learning using InceptionResNetV2 and Keras sequential model. We validated the model externally in two independent tremor cohorts, evaluating accuracy and F1 scores, and compared its performance to expert raters.ResultsWe recruited 521 participants and obtained 2078 spirals (365 DT, 215 ET, 208 ETP, 212 PD, 78 AT, and 525 HV). Mean age of the participants was 46.1 ± 12.4 years, duration of illness was 8.9 ± 8.3 years, and the mean Fahn–Tolosa–Marin Tremor Rating Scale score in patients was 32.4 ± 14.7. The DL classifier demonstrated an overall accuracy of 81% [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.77–0.85] in distinguishing among tremor syndromes. To mitigate the potential risks of data leakage and digital fingerprinting, the algorithm was redeveloped and reanalyzed, yielding an adjusted accuracy of 70% [95% CI: 0.66–0.74]. External validation on an independent cohort of 1535 spiral drawings resulted in an accuracy of 61% [95% CI: 0.59–0.63], with the adjusted algorithm achieving 59% [95% CI: 0.58–0.60], outperforming human raters (accuracy: 46%).ConclusionSupervised DL algorithms can effectively detect tremor syndromes from hand‐drawn spirals, offering unbiased, feature‐independent classification with higher accuracy than human raters. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.30176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundNo objective biomarkers exist for diagnosing and classifying tremor syndromes.ObjectiveThe aim was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) algorithm for classifying tremors from hand‐drawn pen‐on‐paper spirals.MethodsWe recruited participants with dystonic tremor (DT), essential tremor (ET), essential tremor plus (ETP), Parkinson's disease (PD), cerebellar ataxia (AT), and healthy volunteers (HV). Participants drew free‐hand spirals on paper, which were used to train a DL algorithm based on transfer learning using InceptionResNetV2 and Keras sequential model. We validated the model externally in two independent tremor cohorts, evaluating accuracy and F1 scores, and compared its performance to expert raters.ResultsWe recruited 521 participants and obtained 2078 spirals (365 DT, 215 ET, 208 ETP, 212 PD, 78 AT, and 525 HV). Mean age of the participants was 46.1 ± 12.4 years, duration of illness was 8.9 ± 8.3 years, and the mean Fahn–Tolosa–Marin Tremor Rating Scale score in patients was 32.4 ± 14.7. The DL classifier demonstrated an overall accuracy of 81% [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.77–0.85] in distinguishing among tremor syndromes. To mitigate the potential risks of data leakage and digital fingerprinting, the algorithm was redeveloped and reanalyzed, yielding an adjusted accuracy of 70% [95% CI: 0.66–0.74]. External validation on an independent cohort of 1535 spiral drawings resulted in an accuracy of 61% [95% CI: 0.59–0.63], with the adjusted algorithm achieving 59% [95% CI: 0.58–0.60], outperforming human raters (accuracy: 46%).ConclusionSupervised DL algorithms can effectively detect tremor syndromes from hand‐drawn spirals, offering unbiased, feature‐independent classification with higher accuracy than human raters. © 2025 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信