Changes in referential production among Japanese-English bilingual returnee children: a five-year longitudinal study

IF 2.5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Maki Kubota, Vasiliki Chondrogianni, Satsuki Kurokawa, Stefanie Wulff, Jason Rothman
{"title":"Changes in referential production among Japanese-English bilingual returnee children: a five-year longitudinal study","authors":"Maki Kubota, Vasiliki Chondrogianni, Satsuki Kurokawa, Stefanie Wulff, Jason Rothman","doi":"10.1017/s1366728925000173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study tracked the referential production of 25 Japanese-English returnee children for 5 years upon their return to Japan from an English-dominant environment (Mean age = 9.72 at the time of return) and compared their referential strategies to 27 Japanese monolinguals and 27 English monolinguals, age-matched to the returnee’s age at time of return. Returnees used more redundant noun phrases (NPs) in both languages to maintain references compared to monolingual peers. In English, no changes in NP use were noted over time, but increased exposure to English led to fewer redundant NPs when maintaining references. In their native Japanese (L1), returnees used less NPs for maintaining references and more NPs for reintroducing references, indicating improved reference tracking longitudinally. In sum, returnees’ referential production is more sensitive to L1 re-exposure effects than second language (L2) attrition and crucially, increased L2 exposure minimizes redundant referent production among bilingual returnee children.</p>","PeriodicalId":8758,"journal":{"name":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingualism: Language and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728925000173","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study tracked the referential production of 25 Japanese-English returnee children for 5 years upon their return to Japan from an English-dominant environment (Mean age = 9.72 at the time of return) and compared their referential strategies to 27 Japanese monolinguals and 27 English monolinguals, age-matched to the returnee’s age at time of return. Returnees used more redundant noun phrases (NPs) in both languages to maintain references compared to monolingual peers. In English, no changes in NP use were noted over time, but increased exposure to English led to fewer redundant NPs when maintaining references. In their native Japanese (L1), returnees used less NPs for maintaining references and more NPs for reintroducing references, indicating improved reference tracking longitudinally. In sum, returnees’ referential production is more sensitive to L1 re-exposure effects than second language (L2) attrition and crucially, increased L2 exposure minimizes redundant referent production among bilingual returnee children.

日英双语海归儿童指称生产的变化:一项为期五年的纵向研究
本研究对25名日本-英语海归儿童从英语为主的环境中返回日本后(返回时平均年龄为9.72岁)进行了为期5年的参照生产跟踪,并将他们的参照策略与27名日语单语者和27名英语单语者进行了比较,这些儿童的参照策略与海归时年龄相匹配。与只说一种语言的同龄人相比,海归们在两种语言中使用了更多冗余的名词短语(NPs)来保持参考。在英语中,随着时间的推移,NP的使用没有变化,但在维护参考文献时,英语暴露的增加导致冗余NP的减少。在他们的母语日语中,海归使用较少的NPs来维护参考文献,使用更多的NPs来重新引入参考文献,这表明纵向上文献跟踪得到了改善。综上所述,与第二语言(L2)消耗相比,海归的指称生产对母语再暴露效应更为敏感,关键是,增加的L2暴露可以最大限度地减少双语海归儿童的冗余指称生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信