Rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplementation to the low protein diet improves animal growth through modulating colonic microbiome in lambs

IF 7 1区 农林科学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Zhibin Luo, Huimin Ou, Zhiliang Tan, Jinzhen Jiao
{"title":"Rumen-protected methionine and lysine supplementation to the low protein diet improves animal growth through modulating colonic microbiome in lambs","authors":"Zhibin Luo, Huimin Ou, Zhiliang Tan, Jinzhen Jiao","doi":"10.1186/s40104-025-01183-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dietary protein level and amino acid (AA) balance are crucial determinants of animal health and productivity. Supplementing rumen-protected AAs in low-protein diets was considered as an efficient strategy to improve the growth performance of ruminants. The colon serves as a crucial conduit for nutrient metabolism during rumen-protected methionine (RPMet) and rumen-protected lysine (RPLys) supplementation, however, it has been challenging to clarify which specific microbiota and their metabolites play a pivotal role in this process. Here, we applied metagenomic and metabolomic approaches to compare the characteristic microbiome and metabolic strategies in the colon of lambs fed a control diet (CON), a low-protein diet (LP) or a LP diet supplemented with RPMet and RPLys (LR). The LP treatment decreased the average daily weight gain (ADG) in lambs, while the LR treatment tended to elicit a remission in ADG. The butyrate molar concentration was greater (P < 0.05), while acetate molar concentration (P < 0.05) was lower for lambs fed the LP and LR diets compared to those fed the CON diet. Moreover, the LP treatment remarkably decreased total AA concentration (P < 0.05), while LR treatment showed an improvement in the concentrations of methionine, lysine, leucine, glutamate, and tryptophan. Metagenomic insights proved that the microbial metabolic potentials referring to biosynthesis of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and AAs in the colon were remarkably altered by three dietary treatments. Metagenomic binning identified distinct microbial markers for the CON group (Alistipes spp., Phocaeicola spp., and Ruminococcus spp.), LP group (Fibrobacter spp., Prevotella spp., Ruminococcus spp., and Escherichia coli), and LR group (Akkermansia muciniphila and RUG099 spp.). Our findings suggest that RPMet and RPLys supplementation to the low-protein diet could enhance the microbial biosynthesis of butyrate and amino acids, enriche the beneficial bacteria in the colon, and thereby improve the growth performance of lambs.","PeriodicalId":14928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-025-01183-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dietary protein level and amino acid (AA) balance are crucial determinants of animal health and productivity. Supplementing rumen-protected AAs in low-protein diets was considered as an efficient strategy to improve the growth performance of ruminants. The colon serves as a crucial conduit for nutrient metabolism during rumen-protected methionine (RPMet) and rumen-protected lysine (RPLys) supplementation, however, it has been challenging to clarify which specific microbiota and their metabolites play a pivotal role in this process. Here, we applied metagenomic and metabolomic approaches to compare the characteristic microbiome and metabolic strategies in the colon of lambs fed a control diet (CON), a low-protein diet (LP) or a LP diet supplemented with RPMet and RPLys (LR). The LP treatment decreased the average daily weight gain (ADG) in lambs, while the LR treatment tended to elicit a remission in ADG. The butyrate molar concentration was greater (P < 0.05), while acetate molar concentration (P < 0.05) was lower for lambs fed the LP and LR diets compared to those fed the CON diet. Moreover, the LP treatment remarkably decreased total AA concentration (P < 0.05), while LR treatment showed an improvement in the concentrations of methionine, lysine, leucine, glutamate, and tryptophan. Metagenomic insights proved that the microbial metabolic potentials referring to biosynthesis of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and AAs in the colon were remarkably altered by three dietary treatments. Metagenomic binning identified distinct microbial markers for the CON group (Alistipes spp., Phocaeicola spp., and Ruminococcus spp.), LP group (Fibrobacter spp., Prevotella spp., Ruminococcus spp., and Escherichia coli), and LR group (Akkermansia muciniphila and RUG099 spp.). Our findings suggest that RPMet and RPLys supplementation to the low-protein diet could enhance the microbial biosynthesis of butyrate and amino acids, enriche the beneficial bacteria in the colon, and thereby improve the growth performance of lambs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
822
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses all aspects of animal science and biotechnology. That includes domestic animal production, animal genetics and breeding, animal reproduction and physiology, animal nutrition and biochemistry, feed processing technology and bioevaluation, animal biotechnology, and meat science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信