Magnetic Resonance-Digital Subtraction Angiography as a Preprocedural Imaging Modality before Transcatheter Arterial Microembolization for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Katsutoshi Horiuchi, Shinichi Iwakoshi, Akio Tamura, Masatoshi Ikeno, Takeshi Sato, Kouzou Shimizu, Kenji Kawamura, Yasuhito Tanaka, Toshihiro Tanaka
{"title":"Magnetic Resonance-Digital Subtraction Angiography as a Preprocedural Imaging Modality before Transcatheter Arterial Microembolization for Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain.","authors":"Katsutoshi Horiuchi, Shinichi Iwakoshi, Akio Tamura, Masatoshi Ikeno, Takeshi Sato, Kouzou Shimizu, Kenji Kawamura, Yasuhito Tanaka, Toshihiro Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.jvir.2025.03.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study evaluated the potential utility and accuracy of magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography (MR-DSA) as a preoperative imaging modality for transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) in musculoskeletal pain management, compared to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eleven patients with various musculoskeletal conditions underwent MR-DSA and DSA before TAME. Image evaluation was performed on 33 regions of interest (ROIs) across 11 patients. Three experienced readers evaluated abnormal stains using a 4-point scale (0-3). Inter-observer agreements were analyzed using kappa statistics. Sensitivity and specificity of MR-DSA were calculated using DSA as the reference standard. Pain scores (NRS) were obtained pre-TAME and 1 month post-TAME.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inter-observer agreement was substantial for DSA (κ=0.66) and MR-DSA (κ=0.73). MR-DSA showed high sensitivity (1.0) and moderate specificity (0.64) for detecting abnormal stains, with DSA as the reference standard. The pain score decreased by an average of 2.6 on the NRS. Although lesions that were positive on both MR-DSA and DSA tended to show greater pain reduction, this correlation was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MR-DSA is a highly sensitive preoperative imaging modality that can detect abnormal vascular stains associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, its clinical utility remains uncertain, and further large-scale studies are required before drawing definitive conclusions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49962,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2025.03.008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study evaluated the potential utility and accuracy of magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography (MR-DSA) as a preoperative imaging modality for transcatheter arterial microembolization (TAME) in musculoskeletal pain management, compared to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

Materials and methods: Eleven patients with various musculoskeletal conditions underwent MR-DSA and DSA before TAME. Image evaluation was performed on 33 regions of interest (ROIs) across 11 patients. Three experienced readers evaluated abnormal stains using a 4-point scale (0-3). Inter-observer agreements were analyzed using kappa statistics. Sensitivity and specificity of MR-DSA were calculated using DSA as the reference standard. Pain scores (NRS) were obtained pre-TAME and 1 month post-TAME.

Results: Inter-observer agreement was substantial for DSA (κ=0.66) and MR-DSA (κ=0.73). MR-DSA showed high sensitivity (1.0) and moderate specificity (0.64) for detecting abnormal stains, with DSA as the reference standard. The pain score decreased by an average of 2.6 on the NRS. Although lesions that were positive on both MR-DSA and DSA tended to show greater pain reduction, this correlation was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: MR-DSA is a highly sensitive preoperative imaging modality that can detect abnormal vascular stains associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, its clinical utility remains uncertain, and further large-scale studies are required before drawing definitive conclusions.

目的:这项回顾性研究评估了磁共振数字减影血管造影术(MR-DSA)作为经导管动脉微栓塞术(TAME)术前成像方式在肌肉骨骼疼痛治疗中与传统数字减影血管造影术(DSA)相比的潜在效用和准确性:11名患有各种肌肉骨骼疾病的患者在TAME前接受了MR-DSA和DSA检查。对 11 名患者的 33 个感兴趣区 (ROI) 进行了图像评估。三位经验丰富的阅读者使用 4 级评分法(0-3)对异常染色进行评估。采用卡帕统计法分析观察者之间的一致性。以 DSA 作为参考标准,计算 MR-DSA 的敏感性和特异性。TAME前和TAME后1个月的疼痛评分(NRS):DSA(κ=0.66)和MR-DSA(κ=0.73)的观察者间一致性很高。以 DSA 为参考标准,MR-DSA 检测异常染色的灵敏度较高(1.0),特异性适中(0.64)。NRS 疼痛评分平均降低了 2.6 分。虽然 MR-DSA 和 DSA 均呈阳性的病变往往能使疼痛减轻,但这种相关性在统计学上并不显著:结论:MR-DSA 是一种高度敏感的术前成像模式,可检测出与肌肉骨骼疼痛相关的异常血管染色。结论:MR-DSA 是一种高度灵敏的术前成像模式,可检测出与肌肉骨骼疼痛相关的异常血管染色,但其临床实用性仍不确定,需要进一步的大规模研究才能得出明确结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
942
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: JVIR, published continuously since 1990, is an international, monthly peer-reviewed interventional radiology journal. As the official journal of the Society of Interventional Radiology, JVIR is the peer-reviewed journal of choice for interventional radiologists, radiologists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, neurosurgeons, and other clinicians who seek current and reliable information on every aspect of vascular and interventional radiology. Each issue of JVIR covers critical and cutting-edge medical minimally invasive, clinical, basic research, radiological, pathological, and socioeconomic issues of importance to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信