Psychometric, pre-processing, and trial-type considerations in individual differences studies of EEG mid-frontal theta power and latency

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Matthew J. Euler, Jasmin E. Guevara, Julia V. Vehar, Allie R. Geiger, Ty L. McKinney, Jonathan E. Butner
{"title":"Psychometric, pre-processing, and trial-type considerations in individual differences studies of EEG mid-frontal theta power and latency","authors":"Matthew J. Euler,&nbsp;Jasmin E. Guevara,&nbsp;Julia V. Vehar,&nbsp;Allie R. Geiger,&nbsp;Ty L. McKinney,&nbsp;Jonathan E. Butner","doi":"10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2025.112555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>EEG mid-frontal theta-band activity (MFT; 4–8 Hz) is of considerable interest as a possible biomarker in translational research on cognitive control. However, because most of the MFT literature has focused on experimental within-subjects effects, the impact of particular data processing choices on individual difference analyses is not well understood. This study aimed to reduce that gap by examining the psychometric properties of different pipelines for measuring individual differences in MFT power and latency. Ninety-three adults aged 60 or older completed a flanker task during EEG recording. Stimulus-locked MFT was extracted in three primary pipelines via the fast Fourier transform (FFT), linear- and log-spaced wavelet, and filter-Hilbert analyses. The effects of frequency resolution, electrode choice, overall versus peak power, and trial type (overall, congruent, incongruent, and subtraction- and regression-based residual scores contrasting congruent and incongruent activity) were examined, as was the degree of overlap among related variables. Internal consistency reliabilities and associations with reaction times (RT) during the Flanker were assessed for select measures. Results indicated no benefit of higher frequency resolutions or region of interest over single-electrode measurements from FCz. Two-part coefficient alpha reliabilities ranged from 0.63 to 1.00 for MFT power variables, and from 0.02 to 0.83 for latency variables. Contrary to hypotheses and common criticisms of derived scores, correlations with RT were generally strongest for the difference and residual scores, with an additional benefit of time-frequency-based peak power relative to FFT-based overall power (<em>r</em> ~ = 0.30 vs. 0.45). These findings add to the growing literature on psychometric properties of EEG biomarkers, and help clarify measurement strategies that may enhance detection of behavioral and clinical correlates of MFT power and latency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54945,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","volume":"211 ","pages":"Article 112555"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167876025000510","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

EEG mid-frontal theta-band activity (MFT; 4–8 Hz) is of considerable interest as a possible biomarker in translational research on cognitive control. However, because most of the MFT literature has focused on experimental within-subjects effects, the impact of particular data processing choices on individual difference analyses is not well understood. This study aimed to reduce that gap by examining the psychometric properties of different pipelines for measuring individual differences in MFT power and latency. Ninety-three adults aged 60 or older completed a flanker task during EEG recording. Stimulus-locked MFT was extracted in three primary pipelines via the fast Fourier transform (FFT), linear- and log-spaced wavelet, and filter-Hilbert analyses. The effects of frequency resolution, electrode choice, overall versus peak power, and trial type (overall, congruent, incongruent, and subtraction- and regression-based residual scores contrasting congruent and incongruent activity) were examined, as was the degree of overlap among related variables. Internal consistency reliabilities and associations with reaction times (RT) during the Flanker were assessed for select measures. Results indicated no benefit of higher frequency resolutions or region of interest over single-electrode measurements from FCz. Two-part coefficient alpha reliabilities ranged from 0.63 to 1.00 for MFT power variables, and from 0.02 to 0.83 for latency variables. Contrary to hypotheses and common criticisms of derived scores, correlations with RT were generally strongest for the difference and residual scores, with an additional benefit of time-frequency-based peak power relative to FFT-based overall power (r ~ = 0.30 vs. 0.45). These findings add to the growing literature on psychometric properties of EEG biomarkers, and help clarify measurement strategies that may enhance detection of behavioral and clinical correlates of MFT power and latency.
脑电图额叶中波功率和潜伏期的个体差异研究中的心理测量学、预处理和试验类型考虑。
脑电图中额叶θ波段活动;4-8 Hz)作为一种可能的生物标志物在认知控制的转化研究中具有相当大的兴趣。然而,由于大多数MFT文献都集中在实验主体内效应上,特定数据处理选择对个体差异分析的影响并没有得到很好的理解。本研究旨在通过检查不同管道的心理测量特性来测量MFT功率和延迟的个体差异,从而缩小这一差距。93名60岁或以上的成年人在EEG记录期间完成了侧卫任务。通过快速傅里叶变换(FFT)、线性和对数空间小波以及滤波-希尔伯特分析,在三个主要管道中提取刺激锁定的MFT。研究了频率分辨率、电极选择、总体与峰值功率以及试验类型(总体、一致、不一致以及基于减法和回归的残余分数对比一致和不一致活动)的影响,以及相关变量之间的重叠程度。内部一致性,可靠性和关联的反应时间(RT)在侧卫评估选择措施。结果表明,与单电极测量相比,更高的频率分辨率或感兴趣的区域没有好处。MFT功率变量的两部分系数α信度范围从0.63到1.00,延迟变量的两部分系数α信度范围从0.02到0.83。与假设和对衍生分数的常见批评相反,差异和剩余分数与RT的相关性通常最强,基于时间频率的峰值功率相对于基于fft的总功率有额外的好处(r ~ = 0.30 vs. 0.45)。这些发现增加了关于脑电图生物标志物心理测量特性的文献,并有助于阐明测量策略,以增强对MFT功率和潜伏期的行为和临床相关性的检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychophysiology is the official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology, and provides a respected forum for the publication of high quality original contributions on all aspects of psychophysiology. The journal is interdisciplinary and aims to integrate the neurosciences and behavioral sciences. Empirical, theoretical, and review articles are encouraged in the following areas: • Cerebral psychophysiology: including functional brain mapping and neuroimaging with Event-Related Potentials (ERPs), Positron Emission Tomography (PET), Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) and Electroencephalographic studies. • Autonomic functions: including bilateral electrodermal activity, pupillometry and blood volume changes. • Cardiovascular Psychophysiology:including studies of blood pressure, cardiac functioning and respiration. • Somatic psychophysiology: including muscle activity, eye movements and eye blinks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信