A Practical Scoring System for Estimating Ventricular Arrhythmia Events in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Primary Prevention.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
International heart journal Pub Date : 2025-03-31 Epub Date: 2025-03-15 DOI:10.1536/ihj.24-646
Takayuki Goto, Yasuya Inden, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Naoki Tsurumi, Kiichi Miyamae, Hiroyuki Miyazawa, Shun Kondo, Masaya Tachi, Tomoya Iwawaki, Ryota Yamauchi, Kei Hiramatsu, Masafumi Shimojo, Yukiomi Tsuji, Toyoaki Murohara
{"title":"A Practical Scoring System for Estimating Ventricular Arrhythmia Events in Patients with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Primary Prevention.","authors":"Takayuki Goto, Yasuya Inden, Satoshi Yanagisawa, Naoki Tsurumi, Kiichi Miyamae, Hiroyuki Miyazawa, Shun Kondo, Masaya Tachi, Tomoya Iwawaki, Ryota Yamauchi, Kei Hiramatsu, Masafumi Shimojo, Yukiomi Tsuji, Toyoaki Murohara","doi":"10.1536/ihj.24-646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prognostic value of defibrillators in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for primary prevention remains debatable. Predicting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) before implantation is useful for deciding whether to add a defibrillator to a CRT device. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for VA events after CRT device implantation and to construct a scoring model. A total of 153 patients who underwent CRT device implantation, with no history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (including 25 patients with CRT pacemakers) and with follow-up period >1 year after implantation were included. We assessed VA events requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and sustained VA events requiring clinical treatment. During a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, 24 patients (16%) received therapy for VA. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≤ 70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.936, P = 0.037), administration of tolvaptan (HR 11.259, P < 0.001), and coronary artery disease (HR 2.444, P = 0.045) were independent predictors for VA events. Risk scores were assigned based on the HR for each predictor, and the population was divided into 3 risk groups (low: 0 points; moderate: 1-3 points; high: 4-5 points). VAs occurred less frequently in the low-risk group than in the other risk groups (low: 8.1%; moderate: 18%; high: 21%) (log-rank, P < 0.001). No significant differences in mortality were observed between the groups, whereas hospitalization for heart failure occurred more frequently in the high-risk group than in the other groups. In conclusion, a scoring system using specific background information may help predict VA events in prophylactic CRT recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13711,"journal":{"name":"International heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"241-251"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1536/ihj.24-646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The prognostic value of defibrillators in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for primary prevention remains debatable. Predicting ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) before implantation is useful for deciding whether to add a defibrillator to a CRT device. This study aimed to determine the risk factors for VA events after CRT device implantation and to construct a scoring model. A total of 153 patients who underwent CRT device implantation, with no history of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (including 25 patients with CRT pacemakers) and with follow-up period >1 year after implantation were included. We assessed VA events requiring implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy and sustained VA events requiring clinical treatment. During a mean follow-up of 6.3 years, 24 patients (16%) received therapy for VA. Multivariate analysis revealed age ≤ 70 years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.936, P = 0.037), administration of tolvaptan (HR 11.259, P < 0.001), and coronary artery disease (HR 2.444, P = 0.045) were independent predictors for VA events. Risk scores were assigned based on the HR for each predictor, and the population was divided into 3 risk groups (low: 0 points; moderate: 1-3 points; high: 4-5 points). VAs occurred less frequently in the low-risk group than in the other risk groups (low: 8.1%; moderate: 18%; high: 21%) (log-rank, P < 0.001). No significant differences in mortality were observed between the groups, whereas hospitalization for heart failure occurred more frequently in the high-risk group than in the other groups. In conclusion, a scoring system using specific background information may help predict VA events in prophylactic CRT recipients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International heart journal
International heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
148
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Authors of research articles should disclose at the time of submission any financial arrangement they may have with a company whose product figures prominently in the submitted manuscript or with a company making a competing product. Such information will be held in confidence while the paper is under review and will not influence the editorial decision, but if the article is accepted for publication, the editors will usually discuss with the authors the manner in which such information is to be communicated to the reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信