{"title":"Assessment of Intraepithelial Lymphocytes Count in Potential Celiac Disease","authors":"Roberta Mandile, Mariantonia Maglio, Antonella Marano, Luciano Rapacciuolo, Valentina Discepolo, Riccardo Troncone, Renata Auricchio","doi":"10.1111/apm.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) count, central for coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis, can be performed either directly on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained paraffined sections or on optimal-cutting-temperature-compound (OCT)-embedded frozen sections stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti-CD3. We evaluated the concordance in Marsh grading between these two techniques on a large sample of sections. A total of 280 patients with a normal intestinal architecture, 210 potential celiac disease (PCD) patients, and 70 controls (CTR) were included. At the H&E histological evaluation, 136/280 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing < 25 IELs/100 enterocytes) and 144 Marsh-1, while at the IHC evaluation, 191 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing ≤ 34 CD3+/mm of epithelium) and 89 Marsh-1. The overall concordance was 66.8% (48.6% Marsh-1 and 86% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.33. In the PCD group, the overall concordance was 63% (45.6% Marsh-1 and 84% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.26, while in the CTR group it was 77% (60% Marsh-1, 90% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.54. Differences between the two groups were statistically significant (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In conclusion, the concordance of IELs counts between histological and IHC evaluation is low (Kappa Cohen 0.54) in no-CD and even more in PCD patients (0.26). Caution must be paid when classifying a patient as Marsh-0 or Marsh-1 according to the technique used.</p>","PeriodicalId":8167,"journal":{"name":"Apmis","volume":"133 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/apm.70015","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apmis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/apm.70015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs) count, central for coeliac disease (CD) diagnosis, can be performed either directly on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)–stained paraffined sections or on optimal-cutting-temperature-compound (OCT)-embedded frozen sections stained by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with anti-CD3. We evaluated the concordance in Marsh grading between these two techniques on a large sample of sections. A total of 280 patients with a normal intestinal architecture, 210 potential celiac disease (PCD) patients, and 70 controls (CTR) were included. At the H&E histological evaluation, 136/280 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing < 25 IELs/100 enterocytes) and 144 Marsh-1, while at the IHC evaluation, 191 were classified as Marsh-0 (showing ≤ 34 CD3+/mm of epithelium) and 89 Marsh-1. The overall concordance was 66.8% (48.6% Marsh-1 and 86% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.33. In the PCD group, the overall concordance was 63% (45.6% Marsh-1 and 84% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.26, while in the CTR group it was 77% (60% Marsh-1, 90% Marsh-0) with a Cohen Kappa value of 0.54. Differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the concordance of IELs counts between histological and IHC evaluation is low (Kappa Cohen 0.54) in no-CD and even more in PCD patients (0.26). Caution must be paid when classifying a patient as Marsh-0 or Marsh-1 according to the technique used.
期刊介绍:
APMIS, formerly Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, has been published since 1924 by the Scandinavian Societies for Medical Microbiology and Pathology as a non-profit-making scientific journal.