Ensemble-based soil liquefaction assessment: Leveraging CPT data for enhanced predictions

Arsham Moayedi Far, Masoud Zare
{"title":"Ensemble-based soil liquefaction assessment: Leveraging CPT data for enhanced predictions","authors":"Arsham Moayedi Far,&nbsp;Masoud Zare","doi":"10.1002/cend.202400024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on predicting soil liquefaction, a critical phenomenon that can significantly impact the stability and safety of structures during seismic events. Accurate liquefaction assessment is vital for geotechnical engineering, as it informs the design and mitigation strategies needed to safeguard infrastructure and reduce the risk of catastrophic failures. To enhance the accuracy of classification problems associated with liquefaction, we employ ensemble methods, leveraging diverse machine learning techniques such as support vector machines, stochastic gradient descent, multi-layer perceptron neural networks, K-nearest neighbors, and decision trees. The research encompasses data exploration and a subsequent division for performance assessment, followed by hyperparameter tuning through GridSearchCV to optimize model effectiveness. Among the ensemble methods employed, AdaBoost stands out as the most accurate, achieving precision of 85%, recall of 84%, F1 score of 83%, Jaccard index of 72%, and overall accuracy of 84%. However, K-nearest neighbors and decision trees exhibit higher false negative values compared to other methods. Notably, both ensemble approaches provide acceptable estimations, with false negative values ranging from 0 to 1 and false positive values between 7 and 10. The decision tree, while predicting the lowest false positive rate, has a higher false negative count, rendering it less favorable for practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":100248,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Design","volume":"7 1","pages":"23-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cend.202400024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cend.202400024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on predicting soil liquefaction, a critical phenomenon that can significantly impact the stability and safety of structures during seismic events. Accurate liquefaction assessment is vital for geotechnical engineering, as it informs the design and mitigation strategies needed to safeguard infrastructure and reduce the risk of catastrophic failures. To enhance the accuracy of classification problems associated with liquefaction, we employ ensemble methods, leveraging diverse machine learning techniques such as support vector machines, stochastic gradient descent, multi-layer perceptron neural networks, K-nearest neighbors, and decision trees. The research encompasses data exploration and a subsequent division for performance assessment, followed by hyperparameter tuning through GridSearchCV to optimize model effectiveness. Among the ensemble methods employed, AdaBoost stands out as the most accurate, achieving precision of 85%, recall of 84%, F1 score of 83%, Jaccard index of 72%, and overall accuracy of 84%. However, K-nearest neighbors and decision trees exhibit higher false negative values compared to other methods. Notably, both ensemble approaches provide acceptable estimations, with false negative values ranging from 0 to 1 and false positive values between 7 and 10. The decision tree, while predicting the lowest false positive rate, has a higher false negative count, rendering it less favorable for practical applications.

Abstract Image

基于集合的土壤液化评估:利用 CPT 数据加强预测
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信