Ensemble-based soil liquefaction assessment: Leveraging CPT data for enhanced predictions

Arsham Moayedi Far, Masoud Zare
{"title":"Ensemble-based soil liquefaction assessment: Leveraging CPT data for enhanced predictions","authors":"Arsham Moayedi Far,&nbsp;Masoud Zare","doi":"10.1002/cend.202400024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study focuses on predicting soil liquefaction, a critical phenomenon that can significantly impact the stability and safety of structures during seismic events. Accurate liquefaction assessment is vital for geotechnical engineering, as it informs the design and mitigation strategies needed to safeguard infrastructure and reduce the risk of catastrophic failures. To enhance the accuracy of classification problems associated with liquefaction, we employ ensemble methods, leveraging diverse machine learning techniques such as support vector machines, stochastic gradient descent, multi-layer perceptron neural networks, K-nearest neighbors, and decision trees. The research encompasses data exploration and a subsequent division for performance assessment, followed by hyperparameter tuning through GridSearchCV to optimize model effectiveness. Among the ensemble methods employed, AdaBoost stands out as the most accurate, achieving precision of 85%, recall of 84%, F1 score of 83%, Jaccard index of 72%, and overall accuracy of 84%. However, K-nearest neighbors and decision trees exhibit higher false negative values compared to other methods. Notably, both ensemble approaches provide acceptable estimations, with false negative values ranging from 0 to 1 and false positive values between 7 and 10. The decision tree, while predicting the lowest false positive rate, has a higher false negative count, rendering it less favorable for practical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":100248,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering Design","volume":"7 1","pages":"23-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cend.202400024","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cend.202400024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on predicting soil liquefaction, a critical phenomenon that can significantly impact the stability and safety of structures during seismic events. Accurate liquefaction assessment is vital for geotechnical engineering, as it informs the design and mitigation strategies needed to safeguard infrastructure and reduce the risk of catastrophic failures. To enhance the accuracy of classification problems associated with liquefaction, we employ ensemble methods, leveraging diverse machine learning techniques such as support vector machines, stochastic gradient descent, multi-layer perceptron neural networks, K-nearest neighbors, and decision trees. The research encompasses data exploration and a subsequent division for performance assessment, followed by hyperparameter tuning through GridSearchCV to optimize model effectiveness. Among the ensemble methods employed, AdaBoost stands out as the most accurate, achieving precision of 85%, recall of 84%, F1 score of 83%, Jaccard index of 72%, and overall accuracy of 84%. However, K-nearest neighbors and decision trees exhibit higher false negative values compared to other methods. Notably, both ensemble approaches provide acceptable estimations, with false negative values ranging from 0 to 1 and false positive values between 7 and 10. The decision tree, while predicting the lowest false positive rate, has a higher false negative count, rendering it less favorable for practical applications.

Abstract Image

基于集合的土壤液化评估:利用 CPT 数据加强预测
本研究的重点是预测土壤液化,这是一个重要的现象,可以显著影响地震事件中结构的稳定性和安全性。准确的液化评估对岩土工程至关重要,因为它可以为保护基础设施和减少灾难性故障风险所需的设计和缓解战略提供信息。为了提高与液化相关的分类问题的准确性,我们采用集成方法,利用各种机器学习技术,如支持向量机、随机梯度下降、多层感知器神经网络、k近邻和决策树。研究包括数据探索和随后的性能评估划分,然后通过GridSearchCV进行超参数调整以优化模型有效性。在采用的集合方法中,AdaBoost的准确率最高,准确率为85%,召回率为84%,F1评分为83%,Jaccard指数为72%,总体准确率为84%。然而,与其他方法相比,k近邻和决策树表现出更高的假负值。值得注意的是,两种集成方法都提供了可接受的估计,假负值范围为0到1,假正值范围为7到10。决策树,虽然预测最低的假阳性率,有较高的假阴性计数,使其不太有利于实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信