{"title":"Diazotrophs: An Overlooked Sink of N2O","authors":"Himanshu Saxena, Shreya Mehta, Sipai Nazirahmed, Jitender Kumar, Sanjeev Kumar, Arvind Singh","doi":"10.1029/2024GL114117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ocean is the second-largest source of greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O). However, its role as an <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O sink is severely overlooked. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O fixation by diazotrophs has lately been proposed as a new pathway of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O consumption. We investigated diazotrophic <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O consumption and examined the anthropogenic influence on <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O dynamics in the coastal northeastern Arabian Sea, a hotspot of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O emissions. Our findings reveal that relatively unperturbed waters, unlike anthropogenically perturbed waters, are a modest net <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O sink (98 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 29<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>%</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\%$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> saturation), contrary to previous reports. <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O fixation remains active in anthropogenically perturbed waters in contrast to <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> fixation. We additionally provide evidence that the absence of control incubations leads to incorrect fixation rate estimates, further implying that oceanic dark carbon fixation rates might be overestimated. We suggest that <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O fixation not only directly sequesters <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>N</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{N}}_{2}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>O but may correspond to 0.3 Tg C <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>y</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${\\mathrm{y}}^{-1}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> of global ocean net primary production.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024GL114117","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024GL114117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The ocean is the second-largest source of greenhouse gas nitrous oxide (O). However, its role as an O sink is severely overlooked. O fixation by diazotrophs has lately been proposed as a new pathway of O consumption. We investigated diazotrophic O consumption and examined the anthropogenic influence on O dynamics in the coastal northeastern Arabian Sea, a hotspot of O emissions. Our findings reveal that relatively unperturbed waters, unlike anthropogenically perturbed waters, are a modest net O sink (98 29 saturation), contrary to previous reports. O fixation remains active in anthropogenically perturbed waters in contrast to fixation. We additionally provide evidence that the absence of control incubations leads to incorrect fixation rate estimates, further implying that oceanic dark carbon fixation rates might be overestimated. We suggest that O fixation not only directly sequesters O but may correspond to 0.3 Tg C of global ocean net primary production.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.