Outcome of obliterative versus reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women of advanced age − A propensity score analysis

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Padoa , Roni Tomashev , Matar Yekutiel , Hadil Hassouna , Liran Mendel , Tal Fligelman
{"title":"Outcome of obliterative versus reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women of advanced age − A propensity score analysis","authors":"Anna Padoa ,&nbsp;Roni Tomashev ,&nbsp;Matar Yekutiel ,&nbsp;Hadil Hassouna ,&nbsp;Liran Mendel ,&nbsp;Tal Fligelman","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.03.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Le Fort colpocleisis and reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in women aged ≥ 75 were compared. Evaluated outcomes were objective POP cure and long-term complications.</div></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><div>We retrospectively identified patients aged &gt; 75 following POP surgery during 2008–2021. Data were retrieved from clinical files. Objective cure was defined as POP stage &lt; 2. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to balance background variables for outcomes of interest.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>108 women were identified. The PS-matched cohort for objective cure included 65 women and resulted in comparable cure rates: 18 (78.3%) vs 27 (64.3%) women, respectively (p = 0.375). Survival analysis demonstrated decreased rate of objective failure following Le Fort colpocleisis (HR = 0.52, 95% CI of [0.2138, 1.309], p = 0.20).</div><div>In the initial cohort, obliterative surgery resulted in more postoperative constipation. A PS model matched for constipation included 55 women and resulted in a trend to more constipation following Le Fort colpocleisis: 9 (40.9%) women vs 4 (13.8%) women, respectively (p = 0.06, SMD = 0.639).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reconstructive POP surgery and Le Fort colpocleisis are equally effective in women of advanced age. POP recurrence may appear earlier following reconstructive surgery. Obliterative surgery may be related to more postoperative constipation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"309 ","pages":"Pages 27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030121152500171X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Le Fort colpocleisis and reconstructive pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery in women aged ≥ 75 were compared. Evaluated outcomes were objective POP cure and long-term complications.

Study Design

We retrospectively identified patients aged > 75 following POP surgery during 2008–2021. Data were retrieved from clinical files. Objective cure was defined as POP stage < 2. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to balance background variables for outcomes of interest.

Results

108 women were identified. The PS-matched cohort for objective cure included 65 women and resulted in comparable cure rates: 18 (78.3%) vs 27 (64.3%) women, respectively (p = 0.375). Survival analysis demonstrated decreased rate of objective failure following Le Fort colpocleisis (HR = 0.52, 95% CI of [0.2138, 1.309], p = 0.20).
In the initial cohort, obliterative surgery resulted in more postoperative constipation. A PS model matched for constipation included 55 women and resulted in a trend to more constipation following Le Fort colpocleisis: 9 (40.9%) women vs 4 (13.8%) women, respectively (p = 0.06, SMD = 0.639).

Conclusion

Reconstructive POP surgery and Le Fort colpocleisis are equally effective in women of advanced age. POP recurrence may appear earlier following reconstructive surgery. Obliterative surgery may be related to more postoperative constipation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信