Thien Tran , Victor A. Kusuma , David P. Hopkinson , Lingxiang Zhu
{"title":"Disentangling the gap between pure and mixed-gas performance of thin film composite membranes through improved cell design and testing methods","authors":"Thien Tran , Victor A. Kusuma , David P. Hopkinson , Lingxiang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.memsci.2025.123962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Testing thin film composite (TFC) membrane coupons at low stage-cuts (≤5 %) in a sweep-gas permeation system is a common practice to obtain mixed-gas separation properties for benchmarking performance and making scale-up decisions. However, even under these idealized conditions, mixed-gas permeance and selectivity can be more than 30 % lower than their pure-gas values, partially due to concentration polarization, an effect that typically intensifies with increased membrane permeance. This study investigates the effect of cell design on mixed-gas testing using PolyActive™ TFC membranes with pure-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance of 1700–3100 gas permeance unit (GPU), covering the permeance range of most state-of-the-art CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> separation membranes. We designed and 3D-printed a counter-current permeation cell with enhanced feed and sweep flow efficiency, resulting in a 33–41 % increase in mixed-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance compared to traditional permeation cells. Furthermore, we compared sweep-gas and vacuum permeation methods using traditional permeation cells, revealing that the latter delivers 41 % higher mixed-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance, because vacuuming effectively minimizes the downstream concentration polarization. These findings highlight the importance of cell design and permeation apparatus selection in lab-scale mixed-gas testing, with strong implications for module design and process optimization at the industrial scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Science","volume":"724 ","pages":"Article 123962"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738825002753","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Testing thin film composite (TFC) membrane coupons at low stage-cuts (≤5 %) in a sweep-gas permeation system is a common practice to obtain mixed-gas separation properties for benchmarking performance and making scale-up decisions. However, even under these idealized conditions, mixed-gas permeance and selectivity can be more than 30 % lower than their pure-gas values, partially due to concentration polarization, an effect that typically intensifies with increased membrane permeance. This study investigates the effect of cell design on mixed-gas testing using PolyActive™ TFC membranes with pure-gas CO2 permeance of 1700–3100 gas permeance unit (GPU), covering the permeance range of most state-of-the-art CO2/N2 separation membranes. We designed and 3D-printed a counter-current permeation cell with enhanced feed and sweep flow efficiency, resulting in a 33–41 % increase in mixed-gas CO2 permeance compared to traditional permeation cells. Furthermore, we compared sweep-gas and vacuum permeation methods using traditional permeation cells, revealing that the latter delivers 41 % higher mixed-gas CO2 permeance, because vacuuming effectively minimizes the downstream concentration polarization. These findings highlight the importance of cell design and permeation apparatus selection in lab-scale mixed-gas testing, with strong implications for module design and process optimization at the industrial scale.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Membrane Science is a publication that focuses on membrane systems and is aimed at academic and industrial chemists, chemical engineers, materials scientists, and membranologists. It publishes original research and reviews on various aspects of membrane transport, membrane formation/structure, fouling, module/process design, and processes/applications. The journal primarily focuses on the structure, function, and performance of non-biological membranes but also includes papers that relate to biological membranes. The Journal of Membrane Science publishes Full Text Papers, State-of-the-Art Reviews, Letters to the Editor, and Perspectives.