Disentangling the gap between pure and mixed-gas performance of thin film composite membranes through improved cell design and testing methods

IF 8.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
Thien Tran , Victor A. Kusuma , David P. Hopkinson , Lingxiang Zhu
{"title":"Disentangling the gap between pure and mixed-gas performance of thin film composite membranes through improved cell design and testing methods","authors":"Thien Tran ,&nbsp;Victor A. Kusuma ,&nbsp;David P. Hopkinson ,&nbsp;Lingxiang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.memsci.2025.123962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Testing thin film composite (TFC) membrane coupons at low stage-cuts (≤5 %) in a sweep-gas permeation system is a common practice to obtain mixed-gas separation properties for benchmarking performance and making scale-up decisions. However, even under these idealized conditions, mixed-gas permeance and selectivity can be more than 30 % lower than their pure-gas values, partially due to concentration polarization, an effect that typically intensifies with increased membrane permeance. This study investigates the effect of cell design on mixed-gas testing using PolyActive™ TFC membranes with pure-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance of 1700–3100 gas permeance unit (GPU), covering the permeance range of most state-of-the-art CO<sub>2</sub>/N<sub>2</sub> separation membranes. We designed and 3D-printed a counter-current permeation cell with enhanced feed and sweep flow efficiency, resulting in a 33–41 % increase in mixed-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance compared to traditional permeation cells. Furthermore, we compared sweep-gas and vacuum permeation methods using traditional permeation cells, revealing that the latter delivers 41 % higher mixed-gas CO<sub>2</sub> permeance, because vacuuming effectively minimizes the downstream concentration polarization. These findings highlight the importance of cell design and permeation apparatus selection in lab-scale mixed-gas testing, with strong implications for module design and process optimization at the industrial scale.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Science","volume":"724 ","pages":"Article 123962"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376738825002753","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Testing thin film composite (TFC) membrane coupons at low stage-cuts (≤5 %) in a sweep-gas permeation system is a common practice to obtain mixed-gas separation properties for benchmarking performance and making scale-up decisions. However, even under these idealized conditions, mixed-gas permeance and selectivity can be more than 30 % lower than their pure-gas values, partially due to concentration polarization, an effect that typically intensifies with increased membrane permeance. This study investigates the effect of cell design on mixed-gas testing using PolyActive™ TFC membranes with pure-gas CO2 permeance of 1700–3100 gas permeance unit (GPU), covering the permeance range of most state-of-the-art CO2/N2 separation membranes. We designed and 3D-printed a counter-current permeation cell with enhanced feed and sweep flow efficiency, resulting in a 33–41 % increase in mixed-gas CO2 permeance compared to traditional permeation cells. Furthermore, we compared sweep-gas and vacuum permeation methods using traditional permeation cells, revealing that the latter delivers 41 % higher mixed-gas CO2 permeance, because vacuuming effectively minimizes the downstream concentration polarization. These findings highlight the importance of cell design and permeation apparatus selection in lab-scale mixed-gas testing, with strong implications for module design and process optimization at the industrial scale.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Membrane Science
Journal of Membrane Science 工程技术-高分子科学
CiteScore
17.10
自引率
17.90%
发文量
1031
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Membrane Science is a publication that focuses on membrane systems and is aimed at academic and industrial chemists, chemical engineers, materials scientists, and membranologists. It publishes original research and reviews on various aspects of membrane transport, membrane formation/structure, fouling, module/process design, and processes/applications. The journal primarily focuses on the structure, function, and performance of non-biological membranes but also includes papers that relate to biological membranes. The Journal of Membrane Science publishes Full Text Papers, State-of-the-Art Reviews, Letters to the Editor, and Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信