Siliciclastic Reservoir Quality Model, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for reservoir quality evaluation in the ‘OS’ field Niger Delta, Nigeria

Ayodele O. Falade , Olubola Abiola , John O. Amigun
{"title":"Siliciclastic Reservoir Quality Model, a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis approach for reservoir quality evaluation in the ‘OS’ field Niger Delta, Nigeria","authors":"Ayodele O. Falade ,&nbsp;Olubola Abiola ,&nbsp;John O. Amigun","doi":"10.1016/j.oreoa.2025.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) model, the Siliciclastic Reservoir Quality Model (SRQM), for evaluating and ranking reservoirs in oilfields. The SRQM model integrates key reservoir properties, including net pay-to-gross ratio, porosity, water saturation, and shale content, to generate a comprehensive Reservoir Quality Index. The model was applied to the 'OS' field in the Niger Delta, Nigeria, and compared to the conventional Reservoir Quality Index (RQI) approach. The results show a weak negative correlation between the two methods (-0.05764), highlighting their complementary nature. The SRQM model offers a more comprehensive evaluation by incorporating both reservoir rock architecture (porosity and Vsh) and crucial fluid content (Sw and NTG), unlike RQI which focuses solely on rock architecture. SRQM revealed reservoirs 1 and 2 in well OS-5 as the highest quality reservoirs, with an SRQM index of 0.75 and RQI values exceeding 300. Furthermore, the SRQM model revealed variations within other reservoirs. For example, Reservoir 2 in well OS-1, identified as having excellent quality using SRQM, had a relatively low RQI due to its relatively low permeability. This indicates a trade-off between potentially larger hydrocarbon volumes and reduced porosity and permeability. While Reservoirs 1 and 2 have average RQI values of 225.27 and 227.57, indicating excellent quality compared to Reservoir 3 with an average RQI of 99.99, the SRQM ratings reveal a different ranking, with Reservoir 2 (SRQM index: 1.25) and Reservoir 3 (SRQM index: 1.8) considered higher quality than Reservoir 1 (SRQM index: 2.55). This study demonstrates SRQM's ability to consider multiple factors and provide a more robust approach to evaluating reservoir quality. This approach offers a significant improvement over conventional RQI methods, aiding in optimized reservoir development strategies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100993,"journal":{"name":"Ore and Energy Resource Geology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ore and Energy Resource Geology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266626122500015X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a novel Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) model, the Siliciclastic Reservoir Quality Model (SRQM), for evaluating and ranking reservoirs in oilfields. The SRQM model integrates key reservoir properties, including net pay-to-gross ratio, porosity, water saturation, and shale content, to generate a comprehensive Reservoir Quality Index. The model was applied to the 'OS' field in the Niger Delta, Nigeria, and compared to the conventional Reservoir Quality Index (RQI) approach. The results show a weak negative correlation between the two methods (-0.05764), highlighting their complementary nature. The SRQM model offers a more comprehensive evaluation by incorporating both reservoir rock architecture (porosity and Vsh) and crucial fluid content (Sw and NTG), unlike RQI which focuses solely on rock architecture. SRQM revealed reservoirs 1 and 2 in well OS-5 as the highest quality reservoirs, with an SRQM index of 0.75 and RQI values exceeding 300. Furthermore, the SRQM model revealed variations within other reservoirs. For example, Reservoir 2 in well OS-1, identified as having excellent quality using SRQM, had a relatively low RQI due to its relatively low permeability. This indicates a trade-off between potentially larger hydrocarbon volumes and reduced porosity and permeability. While Reservoirs 1 and 2 have average RQI values of 225.27 and 227.57, indicating excellent quality compared to Reservoir 3 with an average RQI of 99.99, the SRQM ratings reveal a different ranking, with Reservoir 2 (SRQM index: 1.25) and Reservoir 3 (SRQM index: 1.8) considered higher quality than Reservoir 1 (SRQM index: 2.55). This study demonstrates SRQM's ability to consider multiple factors and provide a more robust approach to evaluating reservoir quality. This approach offers a significant improvement over conventional RQI methods, aiding in optimized reservoir development strategies.
尼日利亚尼日尔三角洲OS油田储层质量评价的多准则决策分析方法——硅-塑性储层质量模型
本文提出了一种新的多准则决策分析(MCDA)模型——硅塑性储层质量模型(SRQM),用于油田储层评价和分级。SRQM模型综合了储层的主要属性,包括净产油比、孔隙度、含水饱和度和页岩含量,从而生成一个综合的储层质量指数。该模型应用于尼日利亚尼日尔三角洲的“OS”油田,并与常规的储层质量指数(RQI)方法进行了比较。结果显示,两种方法之间呈弱负相关(-0.05764),突出了它们的互补性。与仅关注岩石结构的RQI模型不同,SRQM模型结合了储层岩石结构(孔隙度和Vsh)和关键流体含量(Sw和NTG),提供了更全面的评估。SRQM结果显示,OS-5井1、2储层质量最高,SRQM指数为0.75,RQI值超过300。此外,SRQM模型还揭示了其他储层的变化。例如,OS-1井的2号储层,由于渗透率相对较低,其RQI相对较低,SRQM鉴定为优质储层。这表明了潜在的更大的油气体积与降低的孔隙度和渗透率之间的权衡。1号和2号水库的平均RQI值分别为225.27和227.57,与平均RQI值为99.99的3号水库相比,质量优异,但SRQM评级显示出不同的排名,2号水库(SRQM指数为1.25)和3号水库(SRQM指数为1.8)的质量高于1号水库(SRQM指数为2.55)。该研究证明了SRQM能够考虑多种因素,并提供了一种更可靠的方法来评估储层质量。与传统的RQI方法相比,该方法有了显著的改进,有助于优化油藏开发策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信