Revisión de conceptos, prácticas, paradigmas y evidencias en comunicación aumentativa

Q3 Nursing
Marc Coronas Puig-Pallarols
{"title":"Revisión de conceptos, prácticas, paradigmas y evidencias en comunicación aumentativa","authors":"Marc Coronas Puig-Pallarols","doi":"10.1016/j.rlfa.2025.100523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objectives</h3><div>Augmentative communication (AC) is a field that has experienced significant advances in recent decades, although practices and concepts not always aligned with scientific evidence persist. This study aims to review key concepts, emerging paradigms, and the most innovative practices in AC, identifying their strengths and limitations. It also examines the challenges posed by the proliferation of poorly rigorous information and emphasizes the need to implement Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) to enhance the quality of interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A narrative review of recent scientific literature was conducted, complemented by reflections based on professional experience, to analyze relevant concepts, methods, and approaches in AC. The topics reviewed include Assisted Natural Language, Core Vocabularies, Robust Systems, Motor Planning, Presumption of Competence, and Gestalt Language Processing.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The analysis shows that some current trends in AC lack solid empirical support, which may affect the quality of interventions. However, evidence-based strategies, such as Assisted Language Modeling, have proven effective in enhancing users’ linguistic development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The findings highlight that EBP is essential to ensure ethical and effective interventions. Strengthening professional training and supporting families are recommended as key pillars to optimize AC practices.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56174,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","volume":"45 2","pages":"Article 100523"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Logopedia, Foniatria y Audiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0214460325000117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives

Augmentative communication (AC) is a field that has experienced significant advances in recent decades, although practices and concepts not always aligned with scientific evidence persist. This study aims to review key concepts, emerging paradigms, and the most innovative practices in AC, identifying their strengths and limitations. It also examines the challenges posed by the proliferation of poorly rigorous information and emphasizes the need to implement Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) to enhance the quality of interventions.

Materials and methods

A narrative review of recent scientific literature was conducted, complemented by reflections based on professional experience, to analyze relevant concepts, methods, and approaches in AC. The topics reviewed include Assisted Natural Language, Core Vocabularies, Robust Systems, Motor Planning, Presumption of Competence, and Gestalt Language Processing.

Results

The analysis shows that some current trends in AC lack solid empirical support, which may affect the quality of interventions. However, evidence-based strategies, such as Assisted Language Modeling, have proven effective in enhancing users’ linguistic development.

Conclusions

The findings highlight that EBP is essential to ensure ethical and effective interventions. Strengthening professional training and supporting families are recommended as key pillars to optimize AC practices.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信