Longfeng Wang , Baiquan Song , Muhammad Ishfaq , Xiaoyu Zhao
{"title":"Optimization of nitrogen fertilizer application enhanced sugar beet productivity and socio-ecological benefits in China: A meta-analysis","authors":"Longfeng Wang , Baiquan Song , Muhammad Ishfaq , Xiaoyu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is a key driver for improving sugar beet production, however, the comprehensive effect of the N application rate on beet yield and socio-ecological benefits across various sugar beet-producing regions in China is remains unclear. To address this issue, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted on 256 data sets from 87 studies published between 1980 and 2024. The goal was to optimize nitrogen fertilizer management for sugar beet production. The analysis revealed a clear correlation between nitrogen application and improved sugar beet yield in China. Nitrogen application led to an average increase in beet yield by 26.93 % and sugar yield by 17.74 %, emphasizing its key role in boosting productivity. The highest increase in beet yield (31.10 %) and sugar yield (21.65 %) were achieved with nitrogen application rates between 100 and 200 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>. However, the benefits of increasing nitrogen rates diminished beyond this range, as indicated by reduced agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity. This suggests a threshold where additional nitrogen offers little yield improvement. Interestingly, the optimal N application thresholds are lower in North China as compared to Northeast and Northwest China. Ecological and social benefits were maximized at nitrogen application rates of 169–188 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>, with a clear reduction in diminishing returns. Excessive N application can lead to reduced ecological and social benefits. Site-specific factors, such as soil pH of 6.5–7.5, total N ≤ 1 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, and available potassium ≤ 150 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>, further enhanced beet yield by 36.24 %, 33.84 %, and 35.37 %, respectively. Sugar yield was improved by 27.74 %, 26.13 %, 14.98 %, and 21.84 %, respectively, with optimal conditions including total N ≤ 1 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, soil pH ≤ 6.5, alkali-hydrolyzable N > 120 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>, and available phosphorus 20–40 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing N fertilizer usage in sugar beet production, enhancing environmental sustainability, and advancing green agricultural practices, with potential implications for global sugar beet nitrogen management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"251 ","pages":"Article 106547"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725001011","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nitrogen (N) fertilizer is a key driver for improving sugar beet production, however, the comprehensive effect of the N application rate on beet yield and socio-ecological benefits across various sugar beet-producing regions in China is remains unclear. To address this issue, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted on 256 data sets from 87 studies published between 1980 and 2024. The goal was to optimize nitrogen fertilizer management for sugar beet production. The analysis revealed a clear correlation between nitrogen application and improved sugar beet yield in China. Nitrogen application led to an average increase in beet yield by 26.93 % and sugar yield by 17.74 %, emphasizing its key role in boosting productivity. The highest increase in beet yield (31.10 %) and sugar yield (21.65 %) were achieved with nitrogen application rates between 100 and 200 kg N ha−1. However, the benefits of increasing nitrogen rates diminished beyond this range, as indicated by reduced agronomic efficiency and partial factor productivity. This suggests a threshold where additional nitrogen offers little yield improvement. Interestingly, the optimal N application thresholds are lower in North China as compared to Northeast and Northwest China. Ecological and social benefits were maximized at nitrogen application rates of 169–188 kg N ha−1, with a clear reduction in diminishing returns. Excessive N application can lead to reduced ecological and social benefits. Site-specific factors, such as soil pH of 6.5–7.5, total N ≤ 1 g kg−1, and available potassium ≤ 150 mg kg−1, further enhanced beet yield by 36.24 %, 33.84 %, and 35.37 %, respectively. Sugar yield was improved by 27.74 %, 26.13 %, 14.98 %, and 21.84 %, respectively, with optimal conditions including total N ≤ 1 g kg−1, soil pH ≤ 6.5, alkali-hydrolyzable N > 120 mg kg−1, and available phosphorus 20–40 mg kg−1. This study provides valuable insights for optimizing N fertilizer usage in sugar beet production, enhancing environmental sustainability, and advancing green agricultural practices, with potential implications for global sugar beet nitrogen management.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.