Exploring microbial ubiquity across different plant functional groups and organs

IF 3.9 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Lei Wang, Zhili Liu, Cécile Bres, Guangze Jin, Nicolas Fanin
{"title":"Exploring microbial ubiquity across different plant functional groups and organs","authors":"Lei Wang, Zhili Liu, Cécile Bres, Guangze Jin, Nicolas Fanin","doi":"10.1007/s11104-025-07356-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Aims</h3><p>This study focuses on assessing the diversity and composition of the phyllosphere and rhizosphere communities, exploring the significant overlap in microbial community composition among four different plant functional groups and plant organs, and understanding the fitness match between microorganisms and plants.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Sequencing the microorganisms of different plant functional groups (coniferous, broadleaf, shrubs and herbs) and organs (leaves and roots), we obtained the microbial diversity and community structure and analyzed their differences under different environments, with the objective of identifying core groups of microorganisms present across various environmental conditions.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Across all plant functional groups, bacterial and fungal diversity was higher in the rhizosphere compared to the phyllosphere. Furthermore, bacterial species were more similar in the rhizosphere than in the phyllosphere, suggesting that the leaf surface imposes stronger selective pressures on microbial community composition. The overlap in bacterial and fungal species was higher for herbs compared to taller plant functional groups. This suggests that the similarity in microbial communities between plant organs increases with decreasing plant size. Interestingly, core microbial taxa shared between phyllosphere and rhizosphere were relatively similar for each of the four plant functional groups. Alphaproteobacteria and Dothideomycetes were the dominant taxa in the phyllosphere, whereas Alphaproteobacteria and Agaricomycetes were the dominant taxa in the rhizosphere.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>This study reveals the ubiquity and importance of key microbial taxa within the plant microbiome, highlighting core microorganisms that drive co-evolutionary patterns, while shaping survival, development, and selection across diverse organs and functional groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":20223,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Soil","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Soil","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-025-07356-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

This study focuses on assessing the diversity and composition of the phyllosphere and rhizosphere communities, exploring the significant overlap in microbial community composition among four different plant functional groups and plant organs, and understanding the fitness match between microorganisms and plants.

Methods

Sequencing the microorganisms of different plant functional groups (coniferous, broadleaf, shrubs and herbs) and organs (leaves and roots), we obtained the microbial diversity and community structure and analyzed their differences under different environments, with the objective of identifying core groups of microorganisms present across various environmental conditions.

Results

Across all plant functional groups, bacterial and fungal diversity was higher in the rhizosphere compared to the phyllosphere. Furthermore, bacterial species were more similar in the rhizosphere than in the phyllosphere, suggesting that the leaf surface imposes stronger selective pressures on microbial community composition. The overlap in bacterial and fungal species was higher for herbs compared to taller plant functional groups. This suggests that the similarity in microbial communities between plant organs increases with decreasing plant size. Interestingly, core microbial taxa shared between phyllosphere and rhizosphere were relatively similar for each of the four plant functional groups. Alphaproteobacteria and Dothideomycetes were the dominant taxa in the phyllosphere, whereas Alphaproteobacteria and Agaricomycetes were the dominant taxa in the rhizosphere.

Conclusions

This study reveals the ubiquity and importance of key microbial taxa within the plant microbiome, highlighting core microorganisms that drive co-evolutionary patterns, while shaping survival, development, and selection across diverse organs and functional groups.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Soil
Plant and Soil 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
8.20%
发文量
543
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Plant and Soil publishes original papers and review articles exploring the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and that enhance our mechanistic understanding of plant-soil interactions. We focus on the interface of plant biology and soil sciences, and seek those manuscripts with a strong mechanistic component which develop and test hypotheses aimed at understanding underlying mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Manuscripts can include both fundamental and applied aspects of mineral nutrition, plant water relations, symbiotic and pathogenic plant-microbe interactions, root anatomy and morphology, soil biology, ecology, agrochemistry and agrophysics, as long as they are hypothesis-driven and enhance our mechanistic understanding. Articles including a major molecular or modelling component also fall within the scope of the journal. All contributions appear in the English language, with consistent spelling, using either American or British English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信