Untangling the Relationship Between Red Tape and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Self-Efficacy and High-Individualistic Culture

IF 6.1 1区 管理学 Q1 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Qianhui Li, Bert George
{"title":"Untangling the Relationship Between Red Tape and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Self-Efficacy and High-Individualistic Culture","authors":"Qianhui Li, Bert George","doi":"10.1111/puar.13940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although red tape remains a significant policy concern and despite meta-analytical research showing that it impacts employee and performance outcomes, research elucidating <i>why</i> and <i>under which conditions</i> it does so remains scarce. Using social cognitive theory, we first hypothesize that the relationship between red tape and job satisfaction is mediated by self-efficacy. Second, we argue that red tape is particularly harmful for job satisfaction in high-individualistic cultures. Using a survey dataset of 110,746 teachers across 45 countries, we find that self-efficacy is a statistically significant mediator in the red tape—job satisfaction relationship, explaining about 8% of the relationship. Self-efficacy does not offer a particularly potent mechanism explaining the red tape—job satisfaction relationship, though it does matter. Importantly, we also corroborate assumptions about the role of culture in red tape and public administration research, by finding that red tape is much more harmful for job satisfaction in high-individualistic cultures.","PeriodicalId":48431,"journal":{"name":"Public Administration Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Administration Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13940","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although red tape remains a significant policy concern and despite meta-analytical research showing that it impacts employee and performance outcomes, research elucidating why and under which conditions it does so remains scarce. Using social cognitive theory, we first hypothesize that the relationship between red tape and job satisfaction is mediated by self-efficacy. Second, we argue that red tape is particularly harmful for job satisfaction in high-individualistic cultures. Using a survey dataset of 110,746 teachers across 45 countries, we find that self-efficacy is a statistically significant mediator in the red tape—job satisfaction relationship, explaining about 8% of the relationship. Self-efficacy does not offer a particularly potent mechanism explaining the red tape—job satisfaction relationship, though it does matter. Importantly, we also corroborate assumptions about the role of culture in red tape and public administration research, by finding that red tape is much more harmful for job satisfaction in high-individualistic cultures.
繁文缛节与工作满意度的关系:自我效能感与高度个人主义文化的作用
尽管繁文缛节仍然是一个重要的政策问题,尽管元分析研究表明它会影响员工和绩效结果,但阐明其原因以及在何种条件下会产生这种影响的研究仍然很少。运用社会认知理论,我们首先假设繁文缛节与工作满意度之间的关系是由自我效能感介导的。其次,我们认为,在高度个人主义的文化中,繁文缛节对工作满意度尤其有害。通过对45个国家的110,746名教师的调查数据,我们发现自我效能感在官僚主义与工作满意度的关系中是一个具有统计学意义的中介,解释了8%的关系。自我效能并没有提供一个特别有效的机制来解释繁文缛节与工作满意度之间的关系,尽管它确实很重要。重要的是,我们还通过发现在高度个人主义的文化中,繁文缛节对工作满意度的危害更大,证实了文化在繁文缛节和公共行政研究中所起作用的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Administration Review
Public Administration Review PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
10.80%
发文量
130
期刊介绍: Public Administration Review (PAR), a bi-monthly professional journal, has held its position as the premier outlet for public administration research, theory, and practice for 75 years. Published for the American Society for Public Administration,TM/SM, it uniquely serves both academics and practitioners in the public sector. PAR features articles that identify and analyze current trends, offer a factual basis for decision-making, stimulate discussion, and present leading literature in an easily accessible format. Covering a diverse range of topics and featuring expert book reviews, PAR is both exciting to read and an indispensable resource in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信