State funding for cannabis research: an analysis of funding mechanisms and levels.

IF 4.1 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Agnes Balla, Raymond G Boyle, Christina Dempsey
{"title":"State funding for cannabis research: an analysis of funding mechanisms and levels.","authors":"Agnes Balla, Raymond G Boyle, Christina Dempsey","doi":"10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This paper examines cannabis research funding across U.S. states that have legalized cannabis for medical or adult (non-medical) use. It specifically looks at state legislative efforts to fund cannabis research, and the amount and mechanisms used for funding distribution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed the text of legalization measures within states allowing medical or adult use (non-medical) cannabis for statutory language relating to research or scientific funding. When statutory language on research or scientific funding was not readily available or unclear in the legislative text, we reviewed state government websites or reference materials, or contacted state officials directly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we found that 17 out of 38 states that have passed either medical or adult use laws have legislation that specify a funding mechanism for cannabis research. Of the 17 states that have legislation directing funding to research, only 12 have allocated funding to date. Of those states that have allocated funding, six states distributed funds directly to an academic institution and five moved funding first through state agencies. One state - California - distributed research funding to both an academic institution and through the state cannabis regulatory agency. The amount of funding varies significantly across the states.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>States have much to gain from scientific advancements in the cannabis field, especially as they navigate a preponderance of public policy issues without a federal structure to lean upon. However, with less than half of states that have legalized cannabis use in some form providing funding for research, there is a missed opportunity for states to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of cannabis use within their state. There is also a missed opportunity for researchers and cannabis regulators to collaborate on informing policy options and developing future evidence-informed cannabis regulations. There is a need for more states to consider adopting mechanisms to support cannabis research.</p>","PeriodicalId":101310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cannabis research","volume":"7 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11908053/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cannabis research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42238-025-00264-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This paper examines cannabis research funding across U.S. states that have legalized cannabis for medical or adult (non-medical) use. It specifically looks at state legislative efforts to fund cannabis research, and the amount and mechanisms used for funding distribution.

Methods: We reviewed the text of legalization measures within states allowing medical or adult use (non-medical) cannabis for statutory language relating to research or scientific funding. When statutory language on research or scientific funding was not readily available or unclear in the legislative text, we reviewed state government websites or reference materials, or contacted state officials directly.

Results: Overall, we found that 17 out of 38 states that have passed either medical or adult use laws have legislation that specify a funding mechanism for cannabis research. Of the 17 states that have legislation directing funding to research, only 12 have allocated funding to date. Of those states that have allocated funding, six states distributed funds directly to an academic institution and five moved funding first through state agencies. One state - California - distributed research funding to both an academic institution and through the state cannabis regulatory agency. The amount of funding varies significantly across the states.

Conclusion: States have much to gain from scientific advancements in the cannabis field, especially as they navigate a preponderance of public policy issues without a federal structure to lean upon. However, with less than half of states that have legalized cannabis use in some form providing funding for research, there is a missed opportunity for states to increase understanding of the risks and benefits of cannabis use within their state. There is also a missed opportunity for researchers and cannabis regulators to collaborate on informing policy options and developing future evidence-informed cannabis regulations. There is a need for more states to consider adopting mechanisms to support cannabis research.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信