An artificial intelligence-informed proof of concept model for an ecological framework of healthy longevity forcing factors in the United States

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ross Arena PhD, PT , Shuaijie Wang PhD , Nicolaas P. Pronk PhD , Colin Woodard MA, FRGS , Tanvi Bhatt PhD, PT
{"title":"An artificial intelligence-informed proof of concept model for an ecological framework of healthy longevity forcing factors in the United States","authors":"Ross Arena PhD, PT ,&nbsp;Shuaijie Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Nicolaas P. Pronk PhD ,&nbsp;Colin Woodard MA, FRGS ,&nbsp;Tanvi Bhatt PhD, PT","doi":"10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2025.103035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51006,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Cardiology","volume":"50 5","pages":"Article 103035"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014628062500057X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are a doorway to downstream health consequences characterized by the following: 1) poor quality of life and diminished mobility; 2) increased likelihood of chronic disease risk factors and diagnoses; and, ultimately, 3) a shorter lifespan and healthspan. The aim of the current study is to assess if an ecological framework can predict U.S. lifespan via the use of artificial intelligence. The current study utilized several U.S. county-level datasets representing the predictive variables of the ecologic framework. A non-linear artificial intelligence statistical approach was used to assess the ability of these variables to predict life expectancy, death rate, and years of life lost. The R² values demonstrated that the performance of Extra trees models was different across the three outcomes, however, death rate always exhibited the highest R² for each feature number, indicating superior model accuracy for this outcome. Generally, an increase in the number of features led to improved model performance. Variables from all factors included in the proposed ecological framework were retained in the final predictive models. There is a need to understand why individuals/families/community, connected by shared cultural beliefs, decide to make one lifestyle behavior decision over another.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Problems in Cardiology
Current Problems in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.40%
发文量
392
审稿时长
6 days
期刊介绍: Under the editorial leadership of noted cardiologist Dr. Hector O. Ventura, Current Problems in Cardiology provides focused, comprehensive coverage of important clinical topics in cardiology. Each monthly issues, addresses a selected clinical problem or condition, including pathophysiology, invasive and noninvasive diagnosis, drug therapy, surgical management, and rehabilitation; or explores the clinical applications of a diagnostic modality or a particular category of drugs. Critical commentary from the distinguished editorial board accompanies each monograph, providing readers with additional insights. An extensive bibliography in each issue saves hours of library research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信