Charlotte Carter, Irene Berrar Torre, Sophia Blackburn, Lisa Nwankwo, Tom Semple, Bhavin Rawal, Darius Armstrong-James, Pujan H Patel, Anand Shah
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of biologic therapy in allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis.","authors":"Charlotte Carter, Irene Berrar Torre, Sophia Blackburn, Lisa Nwankwo, Tom Semple, Bhavin Rawal, Darius Armstrong-James, Pujan H Patel, Anand Shah","doi":"10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is characterised by a severe hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus species. Current treatment relies on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and triazole antifungal therapy, but there is increasing evidence of the benefits of biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammatory pathways.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the real-world effectiveness of biologic therapies in patients with ABPA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a large retrospective single-centre analysis of patients with ABPA as defined by the modified ISHAM criteria between 2014 and 2022. Baseline characteristics were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed at 12 months post commencement of a biologic including symptom scores, exacerbation frequency, corticosteroid use and multidisciplinary team (MDT) consensus of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>74 patients received a biologic. 32% (n=24) received anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, 65% (n=48) anti-interleukin-5/5Rα therapy and 3% (n=2) anti-interleukin 4-Rα therapy. 65% (n=48) of patients were deemed to have a successful response at 12 months with a ≥50% reduction in OCS use. 35% (n=26) stopped or changed biologic during the follow-up period due to failed clinical response (n=21), side effects (n=4), or medical co-morbidities (n=1). There was a significant reduction in ACQ-6 score (p = <0.0001), exacerbation rate over 12 months (p = <0.0001) and maintenance OCS use (p = 0.0173). Univariate analysis revealed mucus plugging was associated with non-response to biologic therapy (p = 0.0189) CONCLUSION: Biologic therapies are effective in a number of patients with ABPA. However, further prospective clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness and which phenotypes likely to respond. This data nevertheless increases the evidence-base for biologics in ABPA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology-In Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2025.03.006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA) is characterised by a severe hypersensitivity reaction to Aspergillus species. Current treatment relies on oral corticosteroids (OCS) and triazole antifungal therapy, but there is increasing evidence of the benefits of biologic therapies targeting type 2 inflammatory pathways.
Objective: To assess the real-world effectiveness of biologic therapies in patients with ABPA.
Methods: We performed a large retrospective single-centre analysis of patients with ABPA as defined by the modified ISHAM criteria between 2014 and 2022. Baseline characteristics were recorded. Clinical outcome was assessed at 12 months post commencement of a biologic including symptom scores, exacerbation frequency, corticosteroid use and multidisciplinary team (MDT) consensus of effectiveness.
Results: 74 patients received a biologic. 32% (n=24) received anti-immunoglobulin E therapy, 65% (n=48) anti-interleukin-5/5Rα therapy and 3% (n=2) anti-interleukin 4-Rα therapy. 65% (n=48) of patients were deemed to have a successful response at 12 months with a ≥50% reduction in OCS use. 35% (n=26) stopped or changed biologic during the follow-up period due to failed clinical response (n=21), side effects (n=4), or medical co-morbidities (n=1). There was a significant reduction in ACQ-6 score (p = <0.0001), exacerbation rate over 12 months (p = <0.0001) and maintenance OCS use (p = 0.0173). Univariate analysis revealed mucus plugging was associated with non-response to biologic therapy (p = 0.0189) CONCLUSION: Biologic therapies are effective in a number of patients with ABPA. However, further prospective clinical trials are required to determine the effectiveness and which phenotypes likely to respond. This data nevertheless increases the evidence-base for biologics in ABPA.
期刊介绍:
JACI: In Practice is an official publication of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology (AAAAI). It is a companion title to The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and it aims to provide timely clinical papers, case reports, and management recommendations to clinical allergists and other physicians dealing with allergic and immunologic diseases in their practice. The mission of JACI: In Practice is to offer valid and impactful information that supports evidence-based clinical decisions in the diagnosis and management of asthma, allergies, immunologic conditions, and related diseases.
This journal publishes articles on various conditions treated by allergist-immunologists, including food allergy, respiratory disorders (such as asthma, rhinitis, nasal polyps, sinusitis, cough, ABPA, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis), drug allergy, insect sting allergy, anaphylaxis, dermatologic disorders (such as atopic dermatitis, contact dermatitis, urticaria, angioedema, and HAE), immunodeficiency, autoinflammatory syndromes, eosinophilic disorders, and mast cell disorders.
The focus of the journal is on providing cutting-edge clinical information that practitioners can use in their everyday practice or to acquire new knowledge and skills for the benefit of their patients. However, mechanistic or translational studies without immediate or near future clinical relevance, as well as animal studies, are not within the scope of the journal.