Water use strategies in pines and oaks across biomes are modulated by soil water availability.

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY
Mehmet S Özçelik, Rafael Poyatos
{"title":"Water use strategies in pines and oaks across biomes are modulated by soil water availability.","authors":"Mehmet S Özçelik, Rafael Poyatos","doi":"10.1093/treephys/tpaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quercus and Pinus are amongst the most economically and ecologically relevant genera of woody species across northern hemisphere forests. Mixed pine-oak woodlands are also abundant in temperate and Mediterranean regions. The recent shift towards dominance of oaks in detriment of pines, reported in several regions, could be partly driven by differential drought responses between genera and associated with climate change. Here, we synthesise water use strategies across pine and oak species globally to elucidate whether water-saver and water-spender strategies are consistently found for pines and oak species, respectively, and to what extent these strategies are determined by species traits and site characteristics. Pines showed a water-saver strategy when soils are dry but a comparatively water-spender strategy when soils are wet. These patterns still hold when pines and oaks grow in the same site, and thus are not affected by species interactions between them. Oak species have higher stem hydraulic conductivity and a deeper maximum rooting depth, supporting their higher capacity to withdraw soil water. Water use regulation was more related to traits in pines, showing more water-spender strategies at low absolute values of predawn leaf water potentials, without necessarily increasing hydraulic risk, as a result of adjustments in sapwood-to-leaf area ratio (Huber value) and xylem hydraulic conductivity. Climate and vegetation structure were more related to water use strategies in pines compared to oaks. Our results show that, despite these trait adjustments, drought severely constrains water (and carbon) acquisition in pines, which would tend to favour oak species in drought-prone environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":23286,"journal":{"name":"Tree physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tree physiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpaf031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quercus and Pinus are amongst the most economically and ecologically relevant genera of woody species across northern hemisphere forests. Mixed pine-oak woodlands are also abundant in temperate and Mediterranean regions. The recent shift towards dominance of oaks in detriment of pines, reported in several regions, could be partly driven by differential drought responses between genera and associated with climate change. Here, we synthesise water use strategies across pine and oak species globally to elucidate whether water-saver and water-spender strategies are consistently found for pines and oak species, respectively, and to what extent these strategies are determined by species traits and site characteristics. Pines showed a water-saver strategy when soils are dry but a comparatively water-spender strategy when soils are wet. These patterns still hold when pines and oaks grow in the same site, and thus are not affected by species interactions between them. Oak species have higher stem hydraulic conductivity and a deeper maximum rooting depth, supporting their higher capacity to withdraw soil water. Water use regulation was more related to traits in pines, showing more water-spender strategies at low absolute values of predawn leaf water potentials, without necessarily increasing hydraulic risk, as a result of adjustments in sapwood-to-leaf area ratio (Huber value) and xylem hydraulic conductivity. Climate and vegetation structure were more related to water use strategies in pines compared to oaks. Our results show that, despite these trait adjustments, drought severely constrains water (and carbon) acquisition in pines, which would tend to favour oak species in drought-prone environments.

松木和栎树的水分利用策略受到土壤水分有效性的调节。
栎和松是北半球森林中最具经济和生态意义的木本物种属。在温带和地中海地区,混合松橡树林地也很丰富。据报道,最近在一些地区出现了以橡树为主、以松树为主的趋势,这可能部分是由于不同属间对干旱的不同反应以及与气候变化有关。在这里,我们综合了全球松树和橡树物种的水资源利用策略,以阐明松树和橡树物种是否一致地分别存在节水和耗水策略,以及这些策略在多大程度上由物种特征和场地特征决定。土壤干燥时松树表现出节水策略,土壤湿润时松树表现出相对耗水策略。当松树和橡树生长在同一地点时,这些模式仍然存在,因此不受它们之间物种相互作用的影响。栎树具有较高的茎导水性和较深的最大生根深度,具有较高的吸水能力。水分利用调控更多地与松树的性状相关,由于叶面面积比(Huber值)和木质部水力导率的调节,在黎明前叶片水势绝对值较低的情况下,松树表现出更多的耗水策略,而不一定会增加水力风险。与橡树相比,气候和植被结构与松树的水分利用策略关系更大。我们的研究结果表明,尽管有这些性状调整,干旱严重限制了松树的水分(和碳)获取,这往往有利于干旱易发环境中的橡树物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tree physiology
Tree physiology 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.50%
发文量
133
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Tree Physiology promotes research in a framework of hierarchically organized systems, measuring insight by the ability to link adjacent layers: thus, investigated tree physiology phenomenon should seek mechanistic explanation in finer-scale phenomena as well as seek significance in larger scale phenomena (Passioura 1979). A phenomenon not linked downscale is merely descriptive; an observation not linked upscale, might be trivial. Physiologists often refer qualitatively to processes at finer or coarser scale than the scale of their observation, and studies formally directed at three, or even two adjacent scales are rare. To emphasize the importance of relating mechanisms to coarser scale function, Tree Physiology will highlight papers doing so particularly well as feature papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信