Antinuclear Antibody Multiplex Utilization Across a Large Federal Hospital System: An Investigation of Ordering Practices and Rheumatologic Outcomes.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hamish Patel, David DeMasters, Jeanne Tofferi
{"title":"Antinuclear Antibody Multiplex Utilization Across a Large Federal Hospital System: An Investigation of Ordering Practices and Rheumatologic Outcomes.","authors":"Hamish Patel, David DeMasters, Jeanne Tofferi","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-0641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the ordering patterns of antinuclear antibody (ANA) multiplex testing in a single, large US Department of Defense (DoD) tertiary healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Records of patients with an ANA multiplex assay ordered over a 1-year period were evaluated in a large DoD hospital system. Duplicate tests and patients with a previously established autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) prior to the year of study were excluded. The remaining 2499 patients' charts were reviewed for clinical presentation, ordering specialty, ordering rationale, and whether subsequent rheumatology evaluations resulted in a new ARD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ANA multiplex assay was ordered most often by primary care and medicine subspecialties for > 100 reasons. In the ANA multiplex assay-negative group, 37/2228 (1.66%) individuals were diagnosed with a new ARD. In the ANA multiplex assay-positive group 37/271 (13.7%) individuals were diagnosed with a new ARD. Sjögren disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease were the most common newly diagnosed ARDs in the ANA multiplex assay-positive group. Rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthritis were the most common new ARD diagnoses in the ANA multiplex assay-negative group. In this study, 97% of the ordered ANA assays did not lead to an ARD diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates frequent utilization of the ANA multiplex assay in the evaluation of nonspecific signs and symptoms, with a low rate of ANA-associated ARDs suggesting a need for implementation of strategies to improve understanding of appropriate clinical contexts that warrant ANA testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-0641","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand the ordering patterns of antinuclear antibody (ANA) multiplex testing in a single, large US Department of Defense (DoD) tertiary healthcare system.

Methods: Records of patients with an ANA multiplex assay ordered over a 1-year period were evaluated in a large DoD hospital system. Duplicate tests and patients with a previously established autoimmune rheumatic disease (ARD) prior to the year of study were excluded. The remaining 2499 patients' charts were reviewed for clinical presentation, ordering specialty, ordering rationale, and whether subsequent rheumatology evaluations resulted in a new ARD diagnosis.

Results: The ANA multiplex assay was ordered most often by primary care and medicine subspecialties for > 100 reasons. In the ANA multiplex assay-negative group, 37/2228 (1.66%) individuals were diagnosed with a new ARD. In the ANA multiplex assay-positive group 37/271 (13.7%) individuals were diagnosed with a new ARD. Sjögren disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, and undifferentiated connective tissue disease were the most common newly diagnosed ARDs in the ANA multiplex assay-positive group. Rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthritis were the most common new ARD diagnoses in the ANA multiplex assay-negative group. In this study, 97% of the ordered ANA assays did not lead to an ARD diagnosis.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates frequent utilization of the ANA multiplex assay in the evaluation of nonspecific signs and symptoms, with a low rate of ANA-associated ARDs suggesting a need for implementation of strategies to improve understanding of appropriate clinical contexts that warrant ANA testing.

大型联邦医院系统的ANA多用途利用订餐实践与风湿病预后的调查。
目的:了解美国国防部(DoD)三级医疗保健系统中抗核抗体(ANA)多重检测的顺序模式。方法:在一个大型DoD医院系统中评估了一年多时间内使用ANA多重检测的患者记录。重复试验和在研究年度之前患有自身免疫性风湿病(ARD)的患者被排除在外。对其余2499例患者的病历进行了回顾,包括临床表现、配药专业、配药理由以及随后的风湿病学评估是否导致新的ARD诊断。结果:由于100多种原因,初级保健和医学专科最常订购ANA多重检测。在ANA多重检测阴性组n = 37/ 2228中,1.66%的个体被诊断为新的ARD。在ANA多重检测阳性组n = 37/271中,13.7%的个体被诊断为新的ARD。在ANA多重检测阳性组中,Sjögren疾病、系统性红斑狼疮和未分化结缔组织疾病是最常见的新诊断ARDs。类风湿关节炎和血清阴性脊柱炎是ANA多重检测阴性组中最常见的新ARD诊断。在这项研究中,97%的ANA检测没有导致ARD诊断。结论:本研究表明,在评估非特异性体征和症状时,ANA多重检测的使用频率较高,而ANA相关ARDs的发生率较低,这表明需要实施策略,以提高对需要进行ANA检测的适当临床背景的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信