Optimization of urban stormwater systems: a multi-criteria approach to sustainable and cost-effective LID implementation.

IF 2.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Water Science and Technology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.2166/wst.2025.030
Abbas Roozbahani, Bardia Roghani, Vegard Nilsen, Kim Aleksander Haukland Paus, Ulf Rydningen
{"title":"Optimization of urban stormwater systems: a multi-criteria approach to sustainable and cost-effective LID implementation.","authors":"Abbas Roozbahani, Bardia Roghani, Vegard Nilsen, Kim Aleksander Haukland Paus, Ulf Rydningen","doi":"10.2166/wst.2025.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rapid urbanization has dramatically increased impervious surfaces, exacerbating flood risks in cities globally. Low-impact development (LID) practices are effective in reducing urban runoff, but selecting optimal combinations based on cost, performance, and service benefits remains crucial. This study presents a comprehensive framework for optimizing urban stormwater management by integrating a simulation-optimization module, which consists of stormwater management model-SUSTAIN models, with a multi-criteria decision-making module. To guide decision-makers, it introduces two novel criteria - sustainability index, derived from reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability indices, and vegetated LID coverage to account for LID's extra environmental benefits such as air quality improvement and aesthetics, alongside cost. The proposed methodology is applied to Tehran's District 11, where four LID scenarios, including green roofs (GR), rain barrels (RB), bioretention cells (BC), porous pavements (PP), and vegetated swales (VS), are evaluated using the WASPAS method. Scenario 2 (RB, BC, and VS) is identified as the most favourable due to its cost-effectiveness, even though it has lower vegetated LID coverage than two of the other scenarios. This study offers a practical tool to balance multiple objectives in urban stormwater system design and management, promoting sustainability and cost-efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":23653,"journal":{"name":"Water Science and Technology","volume":"91 5","pages":"654-668"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2025.030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rapid urbanization has dramatically increased impervious surfaces, exacerbating flood risks in cities globally. Low-impact development (LID) practices are effective in reducing urban runoff, but selecting optimal combinations based on cost, performance, and service benefits remains crucial. This study presents a comprehensive framework for optimizing urban stormwater management by integrating a simulation-optimization module, which consists of stormwater management model-SUSTAIN models, with a multi-criteria decision-making module. To guide decision-makers, it introduces two novel criteria - sustainability index, derived from reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability indices, and vegetated LID coverage to account for LID's extra environmental benefits such as air quality improvement and aesthetics, alongside cost. The proposed methodology is applied to Tehran's District 11, where four LID scenarios, including green roofs (GR), rain barrels (RB), bioretention cells (BC), porous pavements (PP), and vegetated swales (VS), are evaluated using the WASPAS method. Scenario 2 (RB, BC, and VS) is identified as the most favourable due to its cost-effectiveness, even though it has lower vegetated LID coverage than two of the other scenarios. This study offers a practical tool to balance multiple objectives in urban stormwater system design and management, promoting sustainability and cost-efficiency.

城市雨水系统的优化:可持续和具有成本效益的LID实施的多标准方法。
快速城市化大大增加了不透水表面,加剧了全球城市的洪水风险。低影响开发(LID)实践在减少城市径流方面是有效的,但根据成本、绩效和服务效益选择最佳组合仍然至关重要。本研究通过将模拟-优化模块(由雨水管理模型- sustain模型组成)与多准则决策模块相结合,构建了城市雨水管理优化的综合框架。为了指导决策者,它引入了两个新的标准——可持续性指数,源自可靠性、弹性和脆弱性指数,以及植被覆盖范围,以考虑LID的额外环境效益,如空气质量改善和美学,以及成本。提出的方法应用于德黑兰11区,使用WASPAS方法评估了四种LID方案,包括绿色屋顶(GR)、雨桶(RB)、生物保留细胞(BC)、多孔路面(PP)和植被洼地(VS)。方案2 (RB, BC和VS)被认为是最有利的,因为它的成本效益,即使它的植被覆盖面积低于其他两种方案。本研究为平衡城市雨水系统设计和管理的多重目标,促进可持续性和成本效益提供了一个实用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water Science and Technology
Water Science and Technology 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
366
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: Water Science and Technology publishes peer-reviewed papers on all aspects of the science and technology of water and wastewater. Papers are selected by a rigorous peer review procedure with the aim of rapid and wide dissemination of research results, development and application of new techniques, and related managerial and policy issues. Scientists, engineers, consultants, managers and policy-makers will find this journal essential as a permanent record of progress of research activities and their practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信