Characteristics, management and outcomes of central versus peripheral pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study.

Abstract

Background: The location of thrombus in acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is a debatable prognostic factor. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with central versus peripheral PE.

Methods: This retrospective study evaluated patients with acute PE diagnosed by CT pulmonary angiography who were hospitalized between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2022. We compared patients with central (pulmonary trunk/main pulmonary artery) and peripheral (lobar/segmental/subsegmental) PE.

Results: We studied 438 patients (median age: 63 years; PE diagnosis in the Emergency Department: 64.8%; PE peripheral in 305 patients [69.6%] and central in 133 [30.4%]). Patients with central PE had higher levels of troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide and more frequent right ventricular strain by CT pulmonary angiography/ echocardiography (72.1% versus 33.3%, p < 0.0001). PE mortality risk could be classified in 355 patients; 24.4% of the 238 patients with peripheral PE were intermediate-high/ high-risk compared with 63.3% of the 117 patients with central PE. Patients with central PE had more systemic thrombolysis (13/133 [9.8%] versus 6/305 [2.0%], p < 0.0001) and more advanced endovascular therapy (15/133 [11.3%] versus 2/305 [0.7%], p < 0.0001). All-cause hospital mortality rate was similar in patients with central and peripheral PE (5.3% and 6.6%, respectively; p = 0.61). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, central versus peripheral PE was not associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.392, 95% confidence interval 0.128, 1.199).

Conclusions: The majority of patients with central PE and a minority of those with peripheral PE were classified as intermediate-high/ high-risk, however, the central thrombus location was not associated with an increased risk of mortality.