Bo Lin, Feng Wang, Shiyue Shen, Yufan Wang, Xia Hong, Xin Ye, Shunji Wang, Youdan Yao, Tianwen Zhang, Huijun Yang, Hongyu Yang
{"title":"Imaging and Pathology Concordance in Head and Neck Cancer: Retrospective Analysis.","authors":"Bo Lin, Feng Wang, Shiyue Shen, Yufan Wang, Xia Hong, Xin Ye, Shunji Wang, Youdan Yao, Tianwen Zhang, Huijun Yang, Hongyu Yang","doi":"10.1111/odi.15268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lymph node metastasis critically impacts prognosis in head and neck malignancies. Preoperative imaging (CT/MRI) is vital for assessment but often yields false results. This study examines the concordance between preoperative imaging and postoperative pathology and identifies factors influencing imaging accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2023 included patients with head and neck malignancies. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed, and the random forest algorithm was utilized for indeterminate cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyzing 1129 records, 26.1% had indeterminate imaging. Imaging accuracy for definitive findings was 72.8%, sensitivity 57.2%, and specificity 86.0%. Logistic regression highlighted alcohol, T, and clinical stage as accuracy influencers. The indeterminate group showed a link between multiple enlarged lymph nodes and positivity. A nomogram achieved 67.5% accuracy. The random forest model, focusing on lymph node diameter, stage, and T classification, improved accuracy to 75.5% over logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study shows moderate imaging-pathology concordance. Key predictors like lymph node size suggest refining criteria with machine learning could enhance head and neck cancer diagnosis. These results could guide more accurate preoperative imaging assessments, leading to better surgical planning and patient outcomes. Subsequent exploration of adjusting lymph node size thresholds or integrating novel imaging technologies would be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":19615,"journal":{"name":"Oral diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.15268","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Lymph node metastasis critically impacts prognosis in head and neck malignancies. Preoperative imaging (CT/MRI) is vital for assessment but often yields false results. This study examines the concordance between preoperative imaging and postoperative pathology and identifies factors influencing imaging accuracy.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study from 2014 to 2023 included patients with head and neck malignancies. Clinical and radiological data were analyzed, and the random forest algorithm was utilized for indeterminate cases.
Results: Analyzing 1129 records, 26.1% had indeterminate imaging. Imaging accuracy for definitive findings was 72.8%, sensitivity 57.2%, and specificity 86.0%. Logistic regression highlighted alcohol, T, and clinical stage as accuracy influencers. The indeterminate group showed a link between multiple enlarged lymph nodes and positivity. A nomogram achieved 67.5% accuracy. The random forest model, focusing on lymph node diameter, stage, and T classification, improved accuracy to 75.5% over logistic regression.
Conclusion: Our study shows moderate imaging-pathology concordance. Key predictors like lymph node size suggest refining criteria with machine learning could enhance head and neck cancer diagnosis. These results could guide more accurate preoperative imaging assessments, leading to better surgical planning and patient outcomes. Subsequent exploration of adjusting lymph node size thresholds or integrating novel imaging technologies would be useful.
期刊介绍:
Oral Diseases is a multidisciplinary and international journal with a focus on head and neck disorders, edited by leaders in the field, Professor Giovanni Lodi (Editor-in-Chief, Milan, Italy), Professor Stefano Petti (Deputy Editor, Rome, Italy) and Associate Professor Gulshan Sunavala-Dossabhoy (Deputy Editor, Shreveport, LA, USA). The journal is pre-eminent in oral medicine. Oral Diseases specifically strives to link often-isolated areas of dentistry and medicine through broad-based scholarship that includes well-designed and controlled clinical research, analytical epidemiology, and the translation of basic science in pre-clinical studies. The journal typically publishes articles relevant to many related medical specialties including especially dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology, infectious diseases, neuropsychiatry, oncology and otolaryngology. The essential requirement is that all submitted research is hypothesis-driven, with significant positive and negative results both welcomed. Equal publication emphasis is placed on etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention and treatment.