Reflux-Related Abnormalities at Distal oesophagus, Gastric Pouch and Anastomotic Site 4 Years After OAGB: Diagnostic Accuracies of Endoscopy Compared to Biopsy and of Symptoms Compared to Both.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Obesity Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1007/s11695-025-07700-3
Mohamad Hayssam ElFawal, Osama Taha, Mahmoud Abdelaal, Dyaa Mohamad, Ihab I El Haj, Hani Tamim, Karim ElFawal, Walid El Ansari
{"title":"Reflux-Related Abnormalities at Distal oesophagus, Gastric Pouch and Anastomotic Site 4 Years After OAGB: Diagnostic Accuracies of Endoscopy Compared to Biopsy and of Symptoms Compared to Both.","authors":"Mohamad Hayssam ElFawal, Osama Taha, Mahmoud Abdelaal, Dyaa Mohamad, Ihab I El Haj, Hani Tamim, Karim ElFawal, Walid El Ansari","doi":"10.1007/s11695-025-07700-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of the current study is to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of upper endoscopy (UE) vs histopathological assessment of patients after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and the presence/absence of symptoms vs these two diagnostic modalities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent OAGB during April 2019-April 2020 and consented to participate. Symptoms (symptoms score questionnaire), macroscopic and microscopic data were collected 4 years later to assess distal oesophageal, gastric pouch and anastomotic site changes. Diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values) of UE vs biopsy and symptoms vs both were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 48.6 ± 13.3 years; 66% were females. At 4 years, 54% had symptoms (symptom score ≥ 4). There were no dysplasia or cancer among this series. UE abnormalities included non-erosive gastritis (44%) and ulcer/s or erosive gastritis (16% each); histopathology abnormalities included chronic gastritis (80%) and Barrett's oesophagus (14%). For UE compared to biopsy, highest sensitivity (76.5%) was at the level of distal oesophagus and highest specificity (100%) at anastomotic site. Pertaining to symptoms compared to investigative modality, highest sensitivity (81.5%) was in relation to symptoms vs UE, while highest specificity (82.6%) was for symptoms vs biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is generally not recommended that (a) UE be used to forecast biopsy abnormalities or lack thereof, except at the anastomotic site, and (b) symptoms or lack thereof be used to forecast the findings of investigative modalities, except with caution, to forecast UE findings in identifying healthy individuals, or to forecast biopsy findings in identifying diseased individuals. Long-term routine follow-up is needed post-OAGB regardless of whether patients are symptomatic or otherwise to rule in or out possible macroscopic/microscopic pathologies. Further research on UE and biopsy findings post-OAGB and their relationships with each other and with symptoms/lack thereof are required to strengthen the thin evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":19460,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1273-1284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-025-07700-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the current study is to appraise the diagnostic accuracy of upper endoscopy (UE) vs histopathological assessment of patients after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and the presence/absence of symptoms vs these two diagnostic modalities.

Methods: Retrospective study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent OAGB during April 2019-April 2020 and consented to participate. Symptoms (symptoms score questionnaire), macroscopic and microscopic data were collected 4 years later to assess distal oesophageal, gastric pouch and anastomotic site changes. Diagnostic accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive values) of UE vs biopsy and symptoms vs both were assessed.

Results: Mean age was 48.6 ± 13.3 years; 66% were females. At 4 years, 54% had symptoms (symptom score ≥ 4). There were no dysplasia or cancer among this series. UE abnormalities included non-erosive gastritis (44%) and ulcer/s or erosive gastritis (16% each); histopathology abnormalities included chronic gastritis (80%) and Barrett's oesophagus (14%). For UE compared to biopsy, highest sensitivity (76.5%) was at the level of distal oesophagus and highest specificity (100%) at anastomotic site. Pertaining to symptoms compared to investigative modality, highest sensitivity (81.5%) was in relation to symptoms vs UE, while highest specificity (82.6%) was for symptoms vs biopsy.

Conclusions: It is generally not recommended that (a) UE be used to forecast biopsy abnormalities or lack thereof, except at the anastomotic site, and (b) symptoms or lack thereof be used to forecast the findings of investigative modalities, except with caution, to forecast UE findings in identifying healthy individuals, or to forecast biopsy findings in identifying diseased individuals. Long-term routine follow-up is needed post-OAGB regardless of whether patients are symptomatic or otherwise to rule in or out possible macroscopic/microscopic pathologies. Further research on UE and biopsy findings post-OAGB and their relationships with each other and with symptoms/lack thereof are required to strengthen the thin evidence base.

OAGB后4年食管远端、胃袋和吻合部位反流相关异常:内镜与活检的诊断准确性,症状与两者的比较
背景:本研究的目的是评估一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)患者的上内镜(UE)与组织病理学评估的诊断准确性,以及这两种诊断方式的症状存在/不存在。方法:对2019年4月- 2020年4月连续接受OAGB治疗并同意参与的50例患者进行回顾性研究。4年后收集症状(症状评分问卷)、肉眼及显微镜资料,评估食管远端、胃袋及吻合口的改变。评估UE与活检的诊断准确性(敏感性、特异性、阳性/阴性预测值)以及症状与两者的诊断准确性。结果:平均年龄48.6±13.3岁;66%是女性。4年时,54%出现症状(症状评分≥4)。本系列病例中未见发育不良或癌症。UE异常包括非糜烂性胃炎(44%)和溃疡或糜烂性胃炎(各16%);组织病理学异常包括慢性胃炎(80%)和Barrett食管(14%)。与活检相比,UE在食管远端水平的灵敏度最高(76.5%),在吻合部位的特异性最高(100%)。与调查方式相比,症状与UE的敏感性最高(81.5%),而症状与活检的特异性最高(82.6%)。结论:一般不建议(a) UE用于预测活检异常或活检缺失,除了吻合口部位;(b)症状或活检缺失用于预测调查模式的结果,除了谨慎之外,用于预测识别健康个体的UE结果,或用于预测识别患病个体的活检结果。无论患者是否有症状或其他情况,oagb后都需要长期常规随访,以排除可能的宏观/微观病理。需要进一步研究oagb后UE和活检结果及其相互关系以及与症状/缺乏症状的关系,以加强薄弱的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obesity Surgery
Obesity Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
24.10%
发文量
567
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Obesity Surgery is the official journal of the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). A journal for bariatric/metabolic surgeons, Obesity Surgery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for communicating the latest research, surgical and laparoscopic techniques, for treatment of massive obesity and metabolic disorders. Topics covered include original research, clinical reports, current status, guidelines, historical notes, invited commentaries, letters to the editor, medicolegal issues, meeting abstracts, modern surgery/technical innovations, new concepts, reviews, scholarly presentations and opinions. Obesity Surgery benefits surgeons performing obesity/metabolic surgery, general surgeons and surgical residents, endoscopists, anesthetists, support staff, nurses, dietitians, psychiatrists, psychologists, plastic surgeons, internists including endocrinologists and diabetologists, nutritional scientists, and those dealing with eating disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信