A R S Essa, A R K Aboud, Mohamed M Z Ahmed, A E El-Nikhaily, Ammar S Easa, Mohamed I A Habba
{"title":"Friction stir welding of aluminum alloy 6082-T6 using eccentric shoulder tools to eliminate the need for tool tilting.","authors":"A R S Essa, A R K Aboud, Mohamed M Z Ahmed, A E El-Nikhaily, Ammar S Easa, Mohamed I A Habba","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-91065-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research investigates the impact of eccentric shoulder tools on the microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded (FSWed) aluminum alloy AA6082-T6. Two tools, one with an eccentric shoulder and one with an aligned shoulder, were employed under identical welding parameters: a rotational speed of 600 rpm, travel speed of 250 mm/min, and tilt angles of 0° and 3°. The four FSWed joints produced were characterized using optical microscopy, tensile testing, and hardness testing. The weld nugget zone (WNZ) microstructure showed significant grain size reduction from 5.24 μm for the base material to 1.63 μm, using the eccentric shoulder tool at 0° tilting angle and 2.78 μm at 3° tilting angle. The aligned shoulder tool resulted in an average grain size of 2.79 μm at 0° tilting angle and 2.23 μm of 3° tilting angle. Thus, the eccentric shoulder tool with a tilt angle of 0° exhibited the smallest average grain size. The mechanical properties obtained are consistent with the microstructure, where the joint produced using the eccentric shoulder at a 0° tilting angle showed the highest tensile strength of 216.5 MPa (89.7% joint efficiency) and 7.71% elongation. In contrast, the aligned shoulder tool resulted in coarser grains and a lower mechanical performance. In addition, this joint exhibited the highest hardness recovery in WNZ. The current study implies that the eccentric shoulder tool can eliminate the need for a tilting angle during FSW, which is required in some applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"8801"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91065-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The present research investigates the impact of eccentric shoulder tools on the microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir welded (FSWed) aluminum alloy AA6082-T6. Two tools, one with an eccentric shoulder and one with an aligned shoulder, were employed under identical welding parameters: a rotational speed of 600 rpm, travel speed of 250 mm/min, and tilt angles of 0° and 3°. The four FSWed joints produced were characterized using optical microscopy, tensile testing, and hardness testing. The weld nugget zone (WNZ) microstructure showed significant grain size reduction from 5.24 μm for the base material to 1.63 μm, using the eccentric shoulder tool at 0° tilting angle and 2.78 μm at 3° tilting angle. The aligned shoulder tool resulted in an average grain size of 2.79 μm at 0° tilting angle and 2.23 μm of 3° tilting angle. Thus, the eccentric shoulder tool with a tilt angle of 0° exhibited the smallest average grain size. The mechanical properties obtained are consistent with the microstructure, where the joint produced using the eccentric shoulder at a 0° tilting angle showed the highest tensile strength of 216.5 MPa (89.7% joint efficiency) and 7.71% elongation. In contrast, the aligned shoulder tool resulted in coarser grains and a lower mechanical performance. In addition, this joint exhibited the highest hardness recovery in WNZ. The current study implies that the eccentric shoulder tool can eliminate the need for a tilting angle during FSW, which is required in some applications.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.