Assessment of Self-Awareness after Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Recommendations for a new Classification of Offline Self-Awareness.

IF 2 3区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Umberto Bivona, Dolores Villalobos
{"title":"Assessment of Self-Awareness after Severe Acquired Brain Injury: Systematic Review and Recommendations for a new Classification of Offline Self-Awareness.","authors":"Umberto Bivona, Dolores Villalobos","doi":"10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Impairment in self-awareness (SA) is an important obstacle in neurorehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury (ABI) patients since it can cause failure in adopting adequate compensatory strategies, or the implementation of ineffective or dangerous behaviors. Accordingly, it should be assessed as early and accurately as possible, even if, to date, no consensus exists on how best to measure SA, and on its explanatory models. The present systematic review aimed to address: (a) to which extent ISA has been assessed in studies enrolling severe ABI patients; (b) whether studies on assessment of SA after severe ABI considered any explanatory models of SA and which measures have been utilized accordingly; (c) possible gaps or criticism in the extant research on severe ABI patients; and (d) to provide a novel proposal for SA assessment/classification based on the results and discussion from the systematic review conducted in this well selected population of patients. A systematic review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO; 701 studies were retrieved and finally 54 met the inclusion criteria. Our review evidenced the paucity of studies on assessment of SA in patients with severe ABI that specified the model and the level of SA. Only a few measures of SA went beyond its intellectual and declarative aspects, thus hindering an exhaustive assessment and a full comprehension of SA. Accordingly, we propose a more comprehensive classification of offline anticipatory SA, with some important implications in the neurorehabilitation field. The review demonstrated the need of measuring SA beyond its declarative level, differentiating between declarative and real anticipatory SA, as well as of assessing SA at both offline and online levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":19279,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychologia","volume":" ","pages":"109123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2025.109123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impairment in self-awareness (SA) is an important obstacle in neurorehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury (ABI) patients since it can cause failure in adopting adequate compensatory strategies, or the implementation of ineffective or dangerous behaviors. Accordingly, it should be assessed as early and accurately as possible, even if, to date, no consensus exists on how best to measure SA, and on its explanatory models. The present systematic review aimed to address: (a) to which extent ISA has been assessed in studies enrolling severe ABI patients; (b) whether studies on assessment of SA after severe ABI considered any explanatory models of SA and which measures have been utilized accordingly; (c) possible gaps or criticism in the extant research on severe ABI patients; and (d) to provide a novel proposal for SA assessment/classification based on the results and discussion from the systematic review conducted in this well selected population of patients. A systematic review was carried out in the databases PubMed, Web of Science and PsycINFO; 701 studies were retrieved and finally 54 met the inclusion criteria. Our review evidenced the paucity of studies on assessment of SA in patients with severe ABI that specified the model and the level of SA. Only a few measures of SA went beyond its intellectual and declarative aspects, thus hindering an exhaustive assessment and a full comprehension of SA. Accordingly, we propose a more comprehensive classification of offline anticipatory SA, with some important implications in the neurorehabilitation field. The review demonstrated the need of measuring SA beyond its declarative level, differentiating between declarative and real anticipatory SA, as well as of assessing SA at both offline and online levels.

重度获得性脑损伤后自我意识评估:系统综述及对离线自我意识新分类的建议
自我意识障碍(SA)是严重获得性脑损伤(ABI)患者神经康复的一个重要障碍,它可能导致患者不能采取适当的代偿策略,或实施无效或危险的行为。因此,应该尽早和尽可能准确地评估它,即使到目前为止,对于如何最好地测量SA及其解释模型还没有达成共识。本系统综述旨在解决:(a)在纳入严重ABI患者的研究中,ISA的评估程度如何;(二)评估严重ABI后的SA的研究是否考虑了SA的解释模型,以及采用了哪些相应的措施;(c)现有对严重ABI患者的研究中可能存在的空白或批评;(d)根据在这一精心挑选的患者群体中进行的系统评价的结果和讨论,提出一种新的SA评估/分类建议。对PubMed、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库进行系统评价;共检索到701项研究,其中54项符合纳入标准。我们的回顾证明了严重ABI患者的SA评估研究的缺乏,这些研究明确了SA的模型和水平。只有一些SA的测量超出了它的智力和陈述方面,因此阻碍了详尽的评估和对SA的充分理解。因此,我们提出了一种更全面的离线预期性SA分类,这在神经康复领域具有重要意义。回顾表明,需要在陈述性水平之外测量SA,区分陈述性和真实预期性SA,以及在离线和在线水平上评估SA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychologia
Neuropsychologia 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
228
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychologia is an international interdisciplinary journal devoted to experimental and theoretical contributions that advance understanding of human cognition and behavior from a neuroscience perspective. The journal will consider for publication studies that link brain function with cognitive processes, including attention and awareness, action and motor control, executive functions and cognitive control, memory, language, and emotion and social cognition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信