Inhaled menthol for dyspnea relief during cycle exercise in COPD: a randomized trial.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002
Michele R Schaeffer, Lucas Vanden Bossche, Kaat Beckers, Kristin Verbeke, Wim Janssens, Dennis Jensen, Jem I Arnold, Andreas von Leupoldt, Daniel Langer
{"title":"Inhaled menthol for dyspnea relief during cycle exercise in COPD: a randomized trial.","authors":"Michele R Schaeffer, Lucas Vanden Bossche, Kaat Beckers, Kristin Verbeke, Wim Janssens, Dennis Jensen, Jem I Arnold, Andreas von Leupoldt, Daniel Langer","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Menthol inhalation (MI) lowers dyspnea ratings during loaded breathing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cycle exercise in healthy adults. Proposed mechanisms include stimulation of cold receptors in the upper airways, modulating perception of breathing-related effort and airflow.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does MI also alleviate exertional dyspnea in COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Twenty COPD patients (60% male, 68±6 years, FEV<sub>1</sub>=47±17 %predicted) completed 2 constant-load cycle exercise tests (73±7 %peak power output) to exhaustion with menthol or placebo (strawberry flavoring) added to the breathing circuit in counter-balanced order and on separate days. Ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters were measured continuously. Dyspnea intensity was serially assessed using the 0-10 category-ratio Borg scale, and dyspnea unpleasantness and related sensory qualities using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile at end-exercise. Participants were asked in which test their inspiratory airflow felt easier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial dyspnea intensity ratings were lower with menthol vs. placebo (estimate (Δ/10%peak time): -0.09, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.02, p=0.01), while ratings of dyspnea unpleasantness, air hunger, and mental breathing effort were lower at end-exercise (all p<0.05). Menthol-related improvements in dyspnea intensity at symptom limitation of the shorter test vs. equivalent time on the other were correlated with higher endurance time (r=-0.73, p<0.001). There were no differences in ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters (p's>0.05). Exercise endurance time was unaffected by menthol (Δ0.3±1.6 minutes with menthol vs. placebo, p=0.50). 85% reported easier inspiratory airflow with menthol.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MI may be useful for management of exertional dyspnea in selected COPD patients. Future work should investigate if MI can improve outcomes of exercise rehabilitation programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Menthol inhalation (MI) lowers dyspnea ratings during loaded breathing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and cycle exercise in healthy adults. Proposed mechanisms include stimulation of cold receptors in the upper airways, modulating perception of breathing-related effort and airflow.

Research question: Does MI also alleviate exertional dyspnea in COPD?

Study design and methods: Twenty COPD patients (60% male, 68±6 years, FEV1=47±17 %predicted) completed 2 constant-load cycle exercise tests (73±7 %peak power output) to exhaustion with menthol or placebo (strawberry flavoring) added to the breathing circuit in counter-balanced order and on separate days. Ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters were measured continuously. Dyspnea intensity was serially assessed using the 0-10 category-ratio Borg scale, and dyspnea unpleasantness and related sensory qualities using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile at end-exercise. Participants were asked in which test their inspiratory airflow felt easier.

Results: Serial dyspnea intensity ratings were lower with menthol vs. placebo (estimate (Δ/10%peak time): -0.09, 95% CI: -0.15 to -0.02, p=0.01), while ratings of dyspnea unpleasantness, air hunger, and mental breathing effort were lower at end-exercise (all p<0.05). Menthol-related improvements in dyspnea intensity at symptom limitation of the shorter test vs. equivalent time on the other were correlated with higher endurance time (r=-0.73, p<0.001). There were no differences in ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters (p's>0.05). Exercise endurance time was unaffected by menthol (Δ0.3±1.6 minutes with menthol vs. placebo, p=0.50). 85% reported easier inspiratory airflow with menthol.

Interpretation: MI may be useful for management of exertional dyspnea in selected COPD patients. Future work should investigate if MI can improve outcomes of exercise rehabilitation programs.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信