Inhaled Menthol for Dyspnea Relief During Cycle Exercise in COPD: A Randomized Trial.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Chest Pub Date : 2025-03-13 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002
Michele R Schaeffer, Lucas Vanden Bossche, Kaat Beckers, Kristin Verbeke, Wim Janssens, Dennis Jensen, Jem I Arnold, Andreas von Leupoldt, Daniel Langer
{"title":"Inhaled Menthol for Dyspnea Relief During Cycle Exercise in COPD: A Randomized Trial.","authors":"Michele R Schaeffer, Lucas Vanden Bossche, Kaat Beckers, Kristin Verbeke, Wim Janssens, Dennis Jensen, Jem I Arnold, Andreas von Leupoldt, Daniel Langer","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Menthol inhalation (MI) lowers dyspnea ratings during loaded breathing in COPD and cycle exercise in healthy adults. Proposed mechanisms include stimulation of cold receptors in the upper airways, modulating perception of breathing-related effort, and airflow.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Does MI also alleviate exertional dyspnea in COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>Twenty patients with COPD (60% male; mean age ± SD, 68 ± 6 years; FEV<sub>1</sub>, 47% ± 17% predicted) completed 2 constant-load cycle exercise tests (73% ± 7% peak power output) to exhaustion with menthol or placebo (strawberry flavoring) added to the breathing circuit in counterbalanced order and on separate days. Ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters were measured continuously. Dyspnea intensity was serially assessed using the 0 to 10 category ratio Borg scale, and dyspnea unpleasantness and related sensory qualities were assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile at end exercise. Participants were asked in which test their inspiratory airflow felt easier.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Serial dyspnea intensity ratings were lower with menthol vs placebo (estimate [Δ/10% peak time]: -0.09; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.02; P = .01), whereas ratings of dyspnea unpleasantness, air hunger, and mental breathing effort were lower at end exercise (all P < .05). Menthol-related improvements in dyspnea intensity at symptom limitation of the shorter test vs equivalent time on the other were correlated with higher endurance time (r = -0.73, P < .001). There were no differences in ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters (P > .05). Exercise endurance time was unaffected by menthol (Δ, 0.3 ± 1.6 minutes with menthol vs placebo; P = .50). A total of 85% reported easier inspiratory airflow with menthol.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>MI may be useful for management of exertional dyspnea in selected patients with COPD. Future work should investigate if MI can improve outcomes of exercise rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05785026; URL: www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2025.03.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Menthol inhalation (MI) lowers dyspnea ratings during loaded breathing in COPD and cycle exercise in healthy adults. Proposed mechanisms include stimulation of cold receptors in the upper airways, modulating perception of breathing-related effort, and airflow.

Research question: Does MI also alleviate exertional dyspnea in COPD?

Study design and methods: Twenty patients with COPD (60% male; mean age ± SD, 68 ± 6 years; FEV1, 47% ± 17% predicted) completed 2 constant-load cycle exercise tests (73% ± 7% peak power output) to exhaustion with menthol or placebo (strawberry flavoring) added to the breathing circuit in counterbalanced order and on separate days. Ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters were measured continuously. Dyspnea intensity was serially assessed using the 0 to 10 category ratio Borg scale, and dyspnea unpleasantness and related sensory qualities were assessed using the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile at end exercise. Participants were asked in which test their inspiratory airflow felt easier.

Results: Serial dyspnea intensity ratings were lower with menthol vs placebo (estimate [Δ/10% peak time]: -0.09; 95% CI, -0.15 to -0.02; P = .01), whereas ratings of dyspnea unpleasantness, air hunger, and mental breathing effort were lower at end exercise (all P < .05). Menthol-related improvements in dyspnea intensity at symptom limitation of the shorter test vs equivalent time on the other were correlated with higher endurance time (r = -0.73, P < .001). There were no differences in ventilatory and neuromuscular parameters (P > .05). Exercise endurance time was unaffected by menthol (Δ, 0.3 ± 1.6 minutes with menthol vs placebo; P = .50). A total of 85% reported easier inspiratory airflow with menthol.

Interpretation: MI may be useful for management of exertional dyspnea in selected patients with COPD. Future work should investigate if MI can improve outcomes of exercise rehabilitation programs.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT05785026; URL: www.

Clinicaltrials: gov.

慢性阻塞性肺病患者循环运动期间吸入薄荷醇缓解呼吸困难:一项随机试验。
背景:薄荷醇吸入(MI)降低慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)和健康成人循环运动中负荷呼吸时的呼吸困难评分。提出的机制包括刺激上呼吸道的冷感受器,调节呼吸相关努力和气流的感知。研究问题:心肌梗死是否也能缓解COPD患者的用力性呼吸困难?研究设计和方法:20例慢性阻塞性肺病患者(60%男性,68±6岁,FEV1=47±17%预测)完成2个恒定负荷周期运动试验(73±7%峰值功率输出),以平衡顺序和在不同的日期向呼吸回路添加薄荷醇或安慰剂(草莓调味剂)。连续测量呼吸和神经肌肉参数。使用0-10分类比博格量表对呼吸困难强度进行连续评估,并在运动结束时使用多维呼吸困难量表对呼吸困难不愉快程度和相关感觉质量进行评估。参与者被问及在哪个测试中他们的吸气气流感觉更容易。结果:与安慰剂相比,薄荷醇组的连续呼吸困难强度评分较低(估计值(Δ/10%峰值时间):-0.09,95% CI: -0.15至-0.02,p=0.01),而运动结束时呼吸困难、空气饥饿和精神呼吸努力的评分较低(均p0.05)。运动耐力时间不受薄荷醇影响(薄荷醇组与安慰剂组分别为Δ0.3±1.6分钟,p=0.50)。85%的人报告说薄荷醇使吸入气流更容易。解释:心肌梗死可能对特定COPD患者的用力性呼吸困难的治疗有用。未来的工作应该研究心肌梗死是否可以改善运动康复计划的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信