Effects of 6 months of permanence in an early intervention program on the developmental level of children 18-42 months of age in poverty: cohort study.

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Miguel Á Villasis-Keever, Jesús H Trujillo-Flores, Angélica Ocaña-Zavaleta, Perla Ma Ortega-Lomelín, Christian A Delaflor-Wagner, Alejandro I Soto-Briseño, Laura A Hernández-Trejo, José A García-Aranda, Daniel Aceves-Villagrán, Hortensia Reyes-Morales, Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba
{"title":"Effects of 6 months of permanence in an early intervention program on the developmental level of children 18-42 months of age in poverty: cohort study.","authors":"Miguel Á Villasis-Keever, Jesús H Trujillo-Flores, Angélica Ocaña-Zavaleta, Perla Ma Ortega-Lomelín, Christian A Delaflor-Wagner, Alejandro I Soto-Briseño, Laura A Hernández-Trejo, José A García-Aranda, Daniel Aceves-Villagrán, Hortensia Reyes-Morales, Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.24000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Child Care Facilities Program (PEI, for its Spanish acronym) in Mexico targets parents of children aged 1-3 years living in poverty, providing education and care strategies 5 days a week. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 6-month stay in childcare centers on the developmental levels of children under 4 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal, before-and-after study was conducted. Children aged 12-42 months enrolled in the PEI were included in the study. All participants remained in the program for 6 months from the first measurement. The overall and area-specific developmental levels were assessed using the Early Childhood Development Assessment (EDI, for its Spanish acronym) test. The percentages of developmental levels (normal, delayed, and at risk of delay) were compared between the baseline and 6-month assessments using the McNemar test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1835 children, of whom 52% were male. The age distribution was as follows: 28.1% were 12-24 months old, 48.4% were 25-36 months old, and 23.5% were 37-42 months old. At baseline, 80.5% (n = 1,476) of the children were classified as having normal overall development, 16% had developmental delay, and 3.5% were at risk for delay. After 6 months, the percentage of children with normal development increased to 90.1%, while those with developmental delay and those at risk for delay decreased to 8.7% and 1.2%, respectively. Similar improvements were observed across various developmental areas, except in the knowledge area.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 6-month stay in childcare centers is beneficial for improving the developmental levels of children under 4 years old, both overall and in motor, language, social, and cognitive areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"82 Supl 1","pages":"86-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.24000167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Child Care Facilities Program (PEI, for its Spanish acronym) in Mexico targets parents of children aged 1-3 years living in poverty, providing education and care strategies 5 days a week. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a 6-month stay in childcare centers on the developmental levels of children under 4 years old.

Methods: A longitudinal, before-and-after study was conducted. Children aged 12-42 months enrolled in the PEI were included in the study. All participants remained in the program for 6 months from the first measurement. The overall and area-specific developmental levels were assessed using the Early Childhood Development Assessment (EDI, for its Spanish acronym) test. The percentages of developmental levels (normal, delayed, and at risk of delay) were compared between the baseline and 6-month assessments using the McNemar test.

Results: The study included 1835 children, of whom 52% were male. The age distribution was as follows: 28.1% were 12-24 months old, 48.4% were 25-36 months old, and 23.5% were 37-42 months old. At baseline, 80.5% (n = 1,476) of the children were classified as having normal overall development, 16% had developmental delay, and 3.5% were at risk for delay. After 6 months, the percentage of children with normal development increased to 90.1%, while those with developmental delay and those at risk for delay decreased to 8.7% and 1.2%, respectively. Similar improvements were observed across various developmental areas, except in the knowledge area.

Conclusions: A 6-month stay in childcare centers is beneficial for improving the developmental levels of children under 4 years old, both overall and in motor, language, social, and cognitive areas.

6个月的长期早期干预计划对18-42月龄贫困儿童发育水平的影响:队列研究。
背景:墨西哥的儿童保育设施项目(PEI,西班牙语首字母缩写)针对生活在贫困中的1-3岁儿童的父母,每周5天提供教育和护理策略。本研究旨在评估在托儿中心待6个月对4岁以下儿童发育水平的影响。方法:采用前后纵向对照研究。在PEI注册的12-42个月的儿童被纳入研究。从第一次测量开始,所有参与者都在这个项目中呆了6个月。使用早期儿童发展评估(EDI,其西班牙语首字母缩写)测试来评估整体和特定区域的发展水平。使用McNemar测试比较基线和6个月评估之间的发育水平百分比(正常,延迟和有延迟风险)。结果:纳入1835名儿童,其中52%为男性。年龄分布:12 ~ 24月龄28.1%,25 ~ 36月龄48.4%,37 ~ 42月龄23.5%。在基线时,80.5% (n = 1476)的儿童被归类为整体发育正常,16%有发育迟缓,3.5%有发育迟缓的风险。6个月后,发育正常的儿童比例上升到90.1%,发育迟缓和有发育迟缓风险的儿童比例分别下降到8.7%和1.2%。在不同的发展领域也观察到类似的改善,除了知识领域。结论:6个月的托儿服务有利于提高4岁以下儿童的整体发展水平和运动、语言、社会、认知等方面的发展水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信