Older adult's acceptance and uptake of referral after screening for cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study in China.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Caiyun Tang, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Rong Huang, Ying Hu, Yao Wang
{"title":"Older adult's acceptance and uptake of referral after screening for cognitive impairment: a cross-sectional study in China.","authors":"Caiyun Tang, Lily Dongxia Xiao, Rong Huang, Ying Hu, Yao Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12877-025-05824-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have shown that the referral situation after cognitive screening is not optimistic. However, little is known about the situation in China. The current study assessed the cognitive function of older adults with an Eight-item Ascertain Dementia (AD8) score of ≥ 2 in a community health center and investigated their willingness to accept referrals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our cross-sectional study, a total of 970 participants completed a cognitive screen using AD8. Those with a score of ≥ 2 were further assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Sociodemographic information was collected. The participants were asked to respond to a questionnaire about their acceptance and uptake of referral after screening and their knowledge of cognitive impairment. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U rank sum test, and binary logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 140 older adults with cognitive impairment from 970 participants. Among the 140 subjects, 37 (26.43%) indicated a willingness to be referred, and 103 (73.57%) declined to be referred. We investigated the reasons for declining referrals, and 69 (66.99%) indicated that they thought referrals were unnecessary. The knowledge of referrals, attitude toward referrals, and knowledge of cognitive impairment showed significant differences concerning participants' willingness to be referred(all p < 0.01). The participants with high knowledge of cognitive impairment were willing to accept referrals (p = 0.009; OR = 1.305; 95% CI: 1.070-1.591).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Chinese older adults with cognitive impairment exhibit a low willingness to be referred. Health education in older adults is needed to raise awareness of cognitive impairment, dementia prevention, treatment, and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"25 1","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-05824-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have shown that the referral situation after cognitive screening is not optimistic. However, little is known about the situation in China. The current study assessed the cognitive function of older adults with an Eight-item Ascertain Dementia (AD8) score of ≥ 2 in a community health center and investigated their willingness to accept referrals.

Methods: In our cross-sectional study, a total of 970 participants completed a cognitive screen using AD8. Those with a score of ≥ 2 were further assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination. Sociodemographic information was collected. The participants were asked to respond to a questionnaire about their acceptance and uptake of referral after screening and their knowledge of cognitive impairment. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, the Mann-Whitney U rank sum test, and binary logistic regression.

Results: We screened 140 older adults with cognitive impairment from 970 participants. Among the 140 subjects, 37 (26.43%) indicated a willingness to be referred, and 103 (73.57%) declined to be referred. We investigated the reasons for declining referrals, and 69 (66.99%) indicated that they thought referrals were unnecessary. The knowledge of referrals, attitude toward referrals, and knowledge of cognitive impairment showed significant differences concerning participants' willingness to be referred(all p < 0.01). The participants with high knowledge of cognitive impairment were willing to accept referrals (p = 0.009; OR = 1.305; 95% CI: 1.070-1.591).

Conclusions: Chinese older adults with cognitive impairment exhibit a low willingness to be referred. Health education in older adults is needed to raise awareness of cognitive impairment, dementia prevention, treatment, and care.

中国老年人对认知障碍筛查后转诊的接受度和采纳率:一项横断面研究。
背景:以往的研究表明,认知筛查后的转诊情况不容乐观。然而,中国的情况却鲜为人知。本研究评估了社区卫生中心中八项痴呆(AD8)评分≥2分的老年人的认知功能,并调查了他们接受转诊的意愿:在我们的横断面研究中,共有 970 名参与者使用 AD8 完成了认知筛查。方法:在我们的横断面研究中,共有 970 名参与者使用 AD8 完成了认知筛查,对得分≥ 2 的参与者使用迷你精神状态检查进行了进一步评估。研究人员还收集了社会人口信息。参与者还被要求回答一份问卷,内容涉及他们在筛查后是否接受和接受转介,以及他们对认知障碍的认识。我们使用描述性统计、卡方检验、曼-惠特尼 U 秩和检验和二元逻辑回归对数据进行了分析:我们从 970 名参与者中筛选出 140 名患有认知障碍的老年人。在 140 名受试者中,37 人(26.43%)表示愿意接受转介,103 人(73.57%)拒绝接受转介。我们调查了他们拒绝转介的原因,其中 69 人(66.99%)表示他们认为转介是不必要的。对转介的了解、对转介的态度以及对认知障碍的了解在参与者是否愿意转介的问题上存在显著差异(均为 p 结论:转介在中国老年人的认知障碍中表现出明显的不确定性:患有认知障碍的中国老年人转诊意愿较低。需要对老年人进行健康教育,以提高他们对认知障碍、痴呆症预防、治疗和护理的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信