Validity of administering the child development evaluation test through telemedicine to children aged 18-72 months.

IF 0.6 Q4 PEDIATRICS
Ilma R Torres-Escobar, Miguel Á Villasis-Keever, Martha M Zapata-Tarrés, Laura A Hernández-Trejo, Christian A Delaflor-Wagner, Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba
{"title":"Validity of administering the child development evaluation test through telemedicine to children aged 18-72 months.","authors":"Ilma R Torres-Escobar, Miguel Á Villasis-Keever, Martha M Zapata-Tarrés, Laura A Hernández-Trejo, Christian A Delaflor-Wagner, Antonio Rizzoli-Córdoba","doi":"10.24875/BMHIM.24000163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early childhood development is a complex process that requires reliable tools for the timely detection of alterations that may affect a child's progress. The Child Development Evaluation test (EDI, in its Spanish acronym) is a screening test developed and validated in Mexico to be administered in person by a professional. The objective is to evaluate the validity of administering the EDI test through telemedicine in terms of its diagnostic concordance with the face-to-face modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This analytical, prospective, and cross-sectional study included patients aged 18-72 months and was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City. The test was administered through telemedicine and subsequently in person. In addition, sensitivity and specificity data were reported with confidence interval of 95% (95% CI). The face-to-face evaluator was blinded to the telemedicine results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty children with a median age of 47 months participated in the study. A sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 91-100) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 70-100) overall were obtained. Language was the higher area with a sensitivity of 100 (95% CI: 91-100) and specificity of 90 (59-98); the results for the other areas are shown. The lowest sensitivity was neurological examination (67; CI 95%: 30-90) but has the highest specificity (98; CI 95%: 88-99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The EDI test implemented through telemedicine shows high correlation with the face-to-face modality, maintaining high sensitivity and specificity. These results make it an appropriate method for screening children of this age, although further larger studies are needed to corroborate it.</p>","PeriodicalId":9103,"journal":{"name":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","volume":"82 Supl 1","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Boletín médico del Hospital Infantil de México","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/BMHIM.24000163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early childhood development is a complex process that requires reliable tools for the timely detection of alterations that may affect a child's progress. The Child Development Evaluation test (EDI, in its Spanish acronym) is a screening test developed and validated in Mexico to be administered in person by a professional. The objective is to evaluate the validity of administering the EDI test through telemedicine in terms of its diagnostic concordance with the face-to-face modality.

Methods: This analytical, prospective, and cross-sectional study included patients aged 18-72 months and was conducted at a tertiary care hospital in Mexico City. The test was administered through telemedicine and subsequently in person. In addition, sensitivity and specificity data were reported with confidence interval of 95% (95% CI). The face-to-face evaluator was blinded to the telemedicine results.

Results: Fifty children with a median age of 47 months participated in the study. A sensitivity of 100% (95% CI, 91-100) and specificity of 100% (95% CI, 70-100) overall were obtained. Language was the higher area with a sensitivity of 100 (95% CI: 91-100) and specificity of 90 (59-98); the results for the other areas are shown. The lowest sensitivity was neurological examination (67; CI 95%: 30-90) but has the highest specificity (98; CI 95%: 88-99).

Conclusion: The EDI test implemented through telemedicine shows high correlation with the face-to-face modality, maintaining high sensitivity and specificity. These results make it an appropriate method for screening children of this age, although further larger studies are needed to corroborate it.

远程医疗对18-72月龄儿童发展评价测验的有效性。
背景:儿童早期发展是一个复杂的过程,需要可靠的工具来及时发现可能影响儿童发展的变化。儿童发展评估测试(EDI,西班牙语缩写)是在墨西哥开发并通过验证的筛查测试,由专业人员亲自实施。我们的目的是评估通过远程医疗进行 EDI 测试与面对面方式进行诊断的有效性:这项分析性、前瞻性和横断面研究包括年龄在 18-72 个月的患者,在墨西哥城的一家三级医院进行。测试通过远程医疗进行,随后由患者亲自进行。此外,还报告了灵敏度和特异性数据,置信区间为 95% (95% CI)。面对面的评估者对远程医疗结果是盲的:50 名儿童参加了研究,中位年龄为 47 个月。总体灵敏度为 100%(95% CI,91-100),特异度为 100%(95% CI,70-100)。语言是灵敏度较高的领域,灵敏度为 100(95% CI:91-100),特异性为 90(59-98);其他领域的结果如图所示。神经系统检查的灵敏度最低(67;CI 95%:30-90),但特异性最高(98;CI 95%:88-99):结论:通过远程医疗实施的电子数据交换测试与面对面模式具有高度相关性,并保持了较高的灵敏度和特异性。这些结果使其成为筛查该年龄段儿童的合适方法,尽管还需要进一步的大型研究来证实这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Boletín Médico del Hospital Infantil de México is a bimonthly publication edited by the Hospital Infantil de México Federico Gómez. It receives unpublished manuscripts, in English or Spanish, relating to paediatrics in the following areas: biomedicine, clinical, public health, clinical epidemology, health education and clinical ethics. Articles can be original research articles, in-depth or systematic reviews, clinical cases, clinical-pathological cases, articles about public health, letters to the editor or editorials (by invitation).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信