Uncovering heterogeneous cognitive trajectories in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Frédéric London, Alice De Haan, Zohra Benyahia, Gaëtane Landenne, Thierry Duprez, Vincent van Pesch, Souraya El Sankari
{"title":"Uncovering heterogeneous cognitive trajectories in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Frédéric London, Alice De Haan, Zohra Benyahia, Gaëtane Landenne, Thierry Duprez, Vincent van Pesch, Souraya El Sankari","doi":"10.1007/s13760-025-02754-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive impairment (CI) frequently occurs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and is assumed to be irreversible. Recent longitudinal studies highlighted the heterogeneity of CI in RRMS, challenging the traditional view of inevitable progression. Longitudinal studies exploring the baseline determinants of future cognitive decline are limited, and none yet explored the predictive value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the evolutionary patterns of cognitive status in a cohort of RRMS patients initiating a new disease modifying treatment, and to determine whether PROMs may have a predictive value for future cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study is a 36-month follow-up of 59 RRMS patients who underwent yearly a comprehensive, multiparametric assessment combining clinical, neuropsychological, MRI-derived metrics and a set of self-reported questionnaires. Lesion load and brain volumes were analyzed and processed by the automated MSmetrix<sup>®</sup> software (Icometrix<sup>®</sup>, Leuven, Belgium). A longitudinal logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate baseline predictors of future cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 (56%) and 17 (35%) patients were defined as cognitively impaired at baseline and at the end of the study, respectively. Of these 33 patients, 20 showed either improvement and/or impairment in fewer cognitive domains at 36-month follow-up. Baseline physical disability as measured by EDSS was the best predictor for future cognitive decline (OR: 2.17; p = 0.03, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-4.38). None of the PROMs variables contributed to predict further cognitive decline.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance of considering the evolution of CI in MS as a dynamic phenomenon with a substantial heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7042,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurologica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-025-02754-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) frequently occurs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) and is assumed to be irreversible. Recent longitudinal studies highlighted the heterogeneity of CI in RRMS, challenging the traditional view of inevitable progression. Longitudinal studies exploring the baseline determinants of future cognitive decline are limited, and none yet explored the predictive value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Objective: To explore the evolutionary patterns of cognitive status in a cohort of RRMS patients initiating a new disease modifying treatment, and to determine whether PROMs may have a predictive value for future cognitive decline.

Methods: This prospective study is a 36-month follow-up of 59 RRMS patients who underwent yearly a comprehensive, multiparametric assessment combining clinical, neuropsychological, MRI-derived metrics and a set of self-reported questionnaires. Lesion load and brain volumes were analyzed and processed by the automated MSmetrix® software (Icometrix®, Leuven, Belgium). A longitudinal logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate baseline predictors of future cognitive decline.

Results: A total of 33 (56%) and 17 (35%) patients were defined as cognitively impaired at baseline and at the end of the study, respectively. Of these 33 patients, 20 showed either improvement and/or impairment in fewer cognitive domains at 36-month follow-up. Baseline physical disability as measured by EDSS was the best predictor for future cognitive decline (OR: 2.17; p = 0.03, 95% confidence interval = 1.07-4.38). None of the PROMs variables contributed to predict further cognitive decline.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of considering the evolution of CI in MS as a dynamic phenomenon with a substantial heterogeneity.

揭示复发缓解型多发性硬化症的异质性认知轨迹:一项纵向研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta neurologica Belgica
Acta neurologica Belgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Peer-reviewed and published quarterly, Acta Neurologica Belgicapresents original articles in the clinical and basic neurosciences, and also reports the proceedings and the abstracts of the scientific meetings of the different partner societies. The contents include commentaries, editorials, review articles, case reports, neuro-images of interest, book reviews and letters to the editor. Acta Neurologica Belgica is the official journal of the following national societies: Belgian Neurological Society Belgian Society for Neuroscience Belgian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology Belgian Pediatric Neurology Society Belgian Study Group of Multiple Sclerosis Belgian Stroke Council Belgian Headache Society Belgian Study Group of Neuropathology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信