Monitoring of immunoglobulin treatment compliance of patients with an inborn error of immunity during the pandemic period.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Yasin Karali, Zuhal Karali, Sukru Cekic, Irem Cakir, Sara Sebnem Kilic
{"title":"Monitoring of immunoglobulin treatment compliance of patients with an inborn error of immunity during the pandemic period.","authors":"Yasin Karali, Zuhal Karali, Sukru Cekic, Irem Cakir, Sara Sebnem Kilic","doi":"10.1186/s12865-025-00703-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, significant challenges have been encountered in managing patients with chronic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the pandemic on follow-up and treatment adherence in patients receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study examining the changes in IRT application methods was conducted between March 2020 and September 2021. An online message line, under the control of nurses and doctors, was established for our patients, and their usage rates for this communication system were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 169 patients, 93 males and 76 females, were included in the study. Among the patients, 124 (73.4%) received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and 45 (26.6%) received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment. Male sex was more common in both the IVIG and SCIG groups. Although all patients in the subcutaneous treatment group continued the treatments regularly, this rate was 80.6% in the IVIG group. During the pandemic, 26 patients switched from IVIG to SCIG treatment. Furthermore, 24 patients interrupted immunoglobulin treatment for various reasons. Patients who received subcutaneous treatment took a long break from their hospital controls, although they applied them properly at home. Routine immunoglobulin trough values were measured in only 17 (37.7%) patients who were on SCIG. In the presence of symptoms, 100% of SCIG patients contacted the remote medical team via the online message line, compared to 48.3% of IVIG patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the pandemic, the route of immunoglobulin treatment should be individualized based on each patient's characteristics and expectations. Telehealth services have emerged as a crucial tool for monitoring patients with chronic disorders, facilitating effective communication and personalized care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9040,"journal":{"name":"BMC Immunology","volume":"26 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11909802/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-025-00703-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, significant challenges have been encountered in managing patients with chronic diseases. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of the pandemic on follow-up and treatment adherence in patients receiving immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT).

Methods: A study examining the changes in IRT application methods was conducted between March 2020 and September 2021. An online message line, under the control of nurses and doctors, was established for our patients, and their usage rates for this communication system were recorded.

Results: A total of 169 patients, 93 males and 76 females, were included in the study. Among the patients, 124 (73.4%) received intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and 45 (26.6%) received subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) treatment. Male sex was more common in both the IVIG and SCIG groups. Although all patients in the subcutaneous treatment group continued the treatments regularly, this rate was 80.6% in the IVIG group. During the pandemic, 26 patients switched from IVIG to SCIG treatment. Furthermore, 24 patients interrupted immunoglobulin treatment for various reasons. Patients who received subcutaneous treatment took a long break from their hospital controls, although they applied them properly at home. Routine immunoglobulin trough values were measured in only 17 (37.7%) patients who were on SCIG. In the presence of symptoms, 100% of SCIG patients contacted the remote medical team via the online message line, compared to 48.3% of IVIG patients.

Conclusion: During the pandemic, the route of immunoglobulin treatment should be individualized based on each patient's characteristics and expectations. Telehealth services have emerged as a crucial tool for monitoring patients with chronic disorders, facilitating effective communication and personalized care.

大流行期间先天性免疫错误患者免疫球蛋白治疗依从性监测
背景:在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,慢性疾病患者的管理遇到了重大挑战。本研究旨在评估大流行对接受免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IRT)患者随访和治疗依从性的影响。方法:在2020年3月至2021年9月期间进行了一项研究,检查了IRT应用方法的变化。在护士和医生的控制下,我们为病人建立了一条在线信息线,并记录了他们对该通信系统的使用率。结果:共纳入169例患者,其中男性93例,女性76例。其中静脉注射免疫球蛋白124例(73.4%),皮下注射免疫球蛋白45例(26.6%)。男性在IVIG组和SCIG组中都更常见。虽然皮下治疗组的所有患者都继续定期治疗,但IVIG组的这一比率为80.6%。在大流行期间,26名患者从IVIG转为SCIG治疗。此外,24例患者因各种原因中断免疫球蛋白治疗。接受皮下治疗的患者与医院对照组相比有很长的休息时间,尽管他们在家中进行了适当的皮下治疗。仅17例(37.7%)接受SCIG治疗的患者检测了常规免疫球蛋白谷值。在出现症状时,100%的SCIG患者通过在线消息线联系远程医疗队,而IVIG患者的这一比例为48.3%。结论:大流行期间,应根据每位患者的特点和期望,个性化免疫球蛋白治疗途径。远程保健服务已成为监测慢性疾病患者、促进有效沟通和个性化护理的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Immunology
BMC Immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Immunology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in molecular, cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of the immune system as well as clinical studies and animal models of human diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信