The cause of perioperative hypersensitivity in adults and consequences of subsequent anesthesia.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ALLERGY
Allergologia et immunopathologia Pub Date : 2025-03-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.15586/aei.v53i2.1281
Zeynep Yegin Katran, İsmet Bulut, Fırat Saydın, Dilek Yavuz, Nazlı Deniz Cosar, Mustafa Katran
{"title":"The cause of perioperative hypersensitivity in adults and consequences of subsequent anesthesia.","authors":"Zeynep Yegin Katran, İsmet Bulut, Fırat Saydın, Dilek Yavuz, Nazlı Deniz Cosar, Mustafa Katran","doi":"10.15586/aei.v53i2.1281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the perioperative period, patients are exposed to many agents that may cause hypersensitivity reaction; so, finding the culprit drug is important for patient safety in the event of the need for repeat anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our aim was to share demographic data, clinical features, and diagnostic tests of patients who developed perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) and in whom the culprit drug was identified.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients evaluated for POH between 2016 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of anesthesia notes, agents used in anesthesia, skin prick test, and intradermal test (IDT) to determine the culprit drug were examined. Patients were interviewed by telephone and questioned about their reanesthesia status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The files of 167,688 patients were analyzed; 405 patients were referred and tested for POH and 330 patients were excluded from the study because they had no history of POH or the culprit drug could not be identified. The study was completed with 75 patients. POH developed during the induction of anesthesia (I) in 18, maintenance (M) in 34, and at the end (E) in 23 patients. The median age was 48, out of which 89.3% (n = 67) were females. Reactions developed during genitourinary system surgery in 33.3% (n = 25), ear-nose-throat surgery in 17.3% (n = 13), and abdominal surgery in 17.3% (n = 13); anaphylaxis developed in 56% (n = 42) (I: 9; M: 21; E: 12); cutaneous involvement in 73.3% (n = 55); cardiovascular involvement in 41.3% (n = 31), respiratory system involvement in 56% (n = 42), and gastrointestinal involvement in 4% (n = 3); Brown grade 1 in 44% (n = 33) and grade 3 in 38.7% (n = 29); Ring and Messmer classification, grade 1 in 44% (n = 33); and cardiac arrest in five patients. For the distribution of culprit drugs: neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in 22.7%, opioids in 21.4%, hypnotics in 17.3%, and antibiotics in 14.6%. In four patients, multiple agents were determined. Skin prick test was positive in 35.1% and IDT positivity was found in 98.6%. Surgery was cancelled in 40% (n = 30), but it was determined that 50 patients (66.7%) underwent surgery after drug tests. All of them tolerated surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusıon: </strong>A large number of patients were evaluated because we are a reference hospital. The most common culprit drug group in POH is NMBA; reanesthesia situations are safe after allergist evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7536,"journal":{"name":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","volume":"53 2","pages":"113-123"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologia et immunopathologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15586/aei.v53i2.1281","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the perioperative period, patients are exposed to many agents that may cause hypersensitivity reaction; so, finding the culprit drug is important for patient safety in the event of the need for repeat anesthesia.

Aim: Our aim was to share demographic data, clinical features, and diagnostic tests of patients who developed perioperative hypersensitivity (POH) and in whom the culprit drug was identified.

Methods: Patients evaluated for POH between 2016 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Results of anesthesia notes, agents used in anesthesia, skin prick test, and intradermal test (IDT) to determine the culprit drug were examined. Patients were interviewed by telephone and questioned about their reanesthesia status.

Results: The files of 167,688 patients were analyzed; 405 patients were referred and tested for POH and 330 patients were excluded from the study because they had no history of POH or the culprit drug could not be identified. The study was completed with 75 patients. POH developed during the induction of anesthesia (I) in 18, maintenance (M) in 34, and at the end (E) in 23 patients. The median age was 48, out of which 89.3% (n = 67) were females. Reactions developed during genitourinary system surgery in 33.3% (n = 25), ear-nose-throat surgery in 17.3% (n = 13), and abdominal surgery in 17.3% (n = 13); anaphylaxis developed in 56% (n = 42) (I: 9; M: 21; E: 12); cutaneous involvement in 73.3% (n = 55); cardiovascular involvement in 41.3% (n = 31), respiratory system involvement in 56% (n = 42), and gastrointestinal involvement in 4% (n = 3); Brown grade 1 in 44% (n = 33) and grade 3 in 38.7% (n = 29); Ring and Messmer classification, grade 1 in 44% (n = 33); and cardiac arrest in five patients. For the distribution of culprit drugs: neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) in 22.7%, opioids in 21.4%, hypnotics in 17.3%, and antibiotics in 14.6%. In four patients, multiple agents were determined. Skin prick test was positive in 35.1% and IDT positivity was found in 98.6%. Surgery was cancelled in 40% (n = 30), but it was determined that 50 patients (66.7%) underwent surgery after drug tests. All of them tolerated surgery.

Conclusıon: A large number of patients were evaluated because we are a reference hospital. The most common culprit drug group in POH is NMBA; reanesthesia situations are safe after allergist evaluation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Professor A. Oehling, Allergologia et Immunopathologia is a forum for those working in the field of pediatric asthma, allergy and immunology. Manuscripts related to clinical, epidemiological and experimental allergy and immunopathology related to childhood will be considered for publication. Allergologia et Immunopathologia is the official journal of the Spanish Society of Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology (SEICAP) and also of the Latin American Society of Immunodeficiencies (LASID). It has and independent international Editorial Committee which submits received papers for peer-reviewing by international experts. The journal accepts original and review articles from all over the world, together with consensus statements from the aforementioned societies. Occasionally, the opinion of an expert on a burning topic is published in the "Point of View" section. Letters to the Editor on previously published papers are welcomed. Allergologia et Immunopathologia publishes 6 issues per year and is included in the major databases such as Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Knowledge, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信