Divergent drought responses in two cold desert shrublands

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70211
Kerry M. Byrne, Justin C. Luong, Kristen M. Kaczynski
{"title":"Divergent drought responses in two cold desert shrublands","authors":"Kerry M. Byrne,&nbsp;Justin C. Luong,&nbsp;Kristen M. Kaczynski","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The frequency and intensity of extreme droughts are projected to increase in the future, yet current research indicates that ecosystem sensitivity to extremes will vary. Despite hundreds of observational and experimental drought studies across ecosystems, the underlying mechanism explaining the inconsistent responses to drought remains poorly understood. Differences in the magnitude or duration of drought, land use history, existing plant communities, or unique site conditions might all influence the drought response of a site. Due to unresolved questions related to ecosystem sensitivity to drought, additional studies are needed to improve our predictions about the drought responses across ecosystems. Here, we minimized differences in drought intensity, climatic variation, and land use history by conducting a rainfall manipulation study in two adjacent (~60 m apart) plant communities with distinct dominant species (<i>Artemisia arbuscula</i> and <i>Artemisia cana</i>) in eastern Oregon, USA. We used rainfall shelters to create a 1-in-100-year drought at each site to understand how chronic (4-year) drought will impact common, but understudied sagebrush steppe plant communities. We found that above- and belowground net primary production at both sites was remarkably resistant to four years of drought. Interestingly, litter increased over time in drought plots at the more productive site, and we hypothesize that hydraulic lift and litter interacted to increase shallow soil water content under drought at that site. The site with harsher edaphic features and a soil duripan experienced fewer changes in plant community composition than the more productive site, potentially due to the presence of specialized plant species at the harsher site. Non-native plant cover increased (primarily from <i>Ventenata dubia</i>) and native forb cover and density decreased across our four sampling years. This suggests that management may be needed to conserve native forb diversity and limit species invasion, especially as the climate and historic fire regimes change.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70211","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70211","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of extreme droughts are projected to increase in the future, yet current research indicates that ecosystem sensitivity to extremes will vary. Despite hundreds of observational and experimental drought studies across ecosystems, the underlying mechanism explaining the inconsistent responses to drought remains poorly understood. Differences in the magnitude or duration of drought, land use history, existing plant communities, or unique site conditions might all influence the drought response of a site. Due to unresolved questions related to ecosystem sensitivity to drought, additional studies are needed to improve our predictions about the drought responses across ecosystems. Here, we minimized differences in drought intensity, climatic variation, and land use history by conducting a rainfall manipulation study in two adjacent (~60 m apart) plant communities with distinct dominant species (Artemisia arbuscula and Artemisia cana) in eastern Oregon, USA. We used rainfall shelters to create a 1-in-100-year drought at each site to understand how chronic (4-year) drought will impact common, but understudied sagebrush steppe plant communities. We found that above- and belowground net primary production at both sites was remarkably resistant to four years of drought. Interestingly, litter increased over time in drought plots at the more productive site, and we hypothesize that hydraulic lift and litter interacted to increase shallow soil water content under drought at that site. The site with harsher edaphic features and a soil duripan experienced fewer changes in plant community composition than the more productive site, potentially due to the presence of specialized plant species at the harsher site. Non-native plant cover increased (primarily from Ventenata dubia) and native forb cover and density decreased across our four sampling years. This suggests that management may be needed to conserve native forb diversity and limit species invasion, especially as the climate and historic fire regimes change.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信