Smart camera traps and computer vision improve detections of small fauna

IF 2.7 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Ecosphere Pub Date : 2025-03-16 DOI:10.1002/ecs2.70220
Angela J. L. Pestell, Anthony R. Rendall, Robin D. Sinclair, Euan G. Ritchie, Duc T. Nguyen, Dean M. Corva, Anne C. Eichholtzer, Abbas Z. Kouzani, Don A. Driscoll
{"title":"Smart camera traps and computer vision improve detections of small fauna","authors":"Angela J. L. Pestell,&nbsp;Anthony R. Rendall,&nbsp;Robin D. Sinclair,&nbsp;Euan G. Ritchie,&nbsp;Duc T. Nguyen,&nbsp;Dean M. Corva,&nbsp;Anne C. Eichholtzer,&nbsp;Abbas Z. Kouzani,&nbsp;Don A. Driscoll","doi":"10.1002/ecs2.70220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Limited data on species' distributions are common for small animals, impeding conservation and management. Small animals, especially ectothermic taxa, are often difficult to detect, and therefore require increased time and resources to survey effectively. The rise of conservation technology has enabled researchers to monitor animals in a range of ecosystems and for longer periods than traditional methods (e.g., live trapping), increasing the quality of data and the cost-effectiveness of wildlife monitoring practices. We used DeakinCams, custom-built smart camera traps, to address three aims: (1) To survey small animals, including ectotherms, and evaluate the performance of a customized computer vision object detector trained on the SAWIT dataset for automating object classification; (2) At the same field sites and using commercially available camera traps, we evaluated how well MegaDetector—a freely available object detection model—detected images containing animals; and (3) we evaluated the complementarity of these two different approaches to wildlife monitoring. We collected 85,870 videos from the DeakinCams and 50,888 images from the commercial cameras. For object detection with DeakinCams data, SAWIT yielded 98% Precision but 47% recall, and for species classification, SAWIT performance varied by taxa, with 0% Precision and Recall for birds and 26% Precision and 14% Recall for spiders. For object detections with camera trap images, MegaDetector returned 99% Precision and 98% Recall. We found that only the DeakinCams detected nocturnal ectotherms and invertebrates. Making use of more diverse datasets for training models as well as advances in machine learning will likely improve the performance of models like YOLO in novel environments. Our results support the need for continued cross-disciplinary collaboration to ensure that large environmental datasets are available to train and test existing and emerging machine learning algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":48930,"journal":{"name":"Ecosphere","volume":"16 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ecs2.70220","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosphere","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.70220","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Limited data on species' distributions are common for small animals, impeding conservation and management. Small animals, especially ectothermic taxa, are often difficult to detect, and therefore require increased time and resources to survey effectively. The rise of conservation technology has enabled researchers to monitor animals in a range of ecosystems and for longer periods than traditional methods (e.g., live trapping), increasing the quality of data and the cost-effectiveness of wildlife monitoring practices. We used DeakinCams, custom-built smart camera traps, to address three aims: (1) To survey small animals, including ectotherms, and evaluate the performance of a customized computer vision object detector trained on the SAWIT dataset for automating object classification; (2) At the same field sites and using commercially available camera traps, we evaluated how well MegaDetector—a freely available object detection model—detected images containing animals; and (3) we evaluated the complementarity of these two different approaches to wildlife monitoring. We collected 85,870 videos from the DeakinCams and 50,888 images from the commercial cameras. For object detection with DeakinCams data, SAWIT yielded 98% Precision but 47% recall, and for species classification, SAWIT performance varied by taxa, with 0% Precision and Recall for birds and 26% Precision and 14% Recall for spiders. For object detections with camera trap images, MegaDetector returned 99% Precision and 98% Recall. We found that only the DeakinCams detected nocturnal ectotherms and invertebrates. Making use of more diverse datasets for training models as well as advances in machine learning will likely improve the performance of models like YOLO in novel environments. Our results support the need for continued cross-disciplinary collaboration to ensure that large environmental datasets are available to train and test existing and emerging machine learning algorithms.

Abstract Image

智能相机陷阱和计算机视觉提高了对小型动物的探测能力
关于物种分布的有限数据对小动物来说很常见,阻碍了保护和管理。小动物,尤其是恒温分类群,往往很难被发现,因此需要更多的时间和资源来进行有效的调查。保护技术的兴起使研究人员能够在一系列生态系统中监测动物,并且比传统方法(例如,现场诱捕)监测时间更长,从而提高了数据质量和野生动物监测实践的成本效益。我们使用定制的智能相机陷阱DeakinCams来实现三个目标:(1)调查小动物,包括变温动物,并评估在SAWIT数据集上训练的定制计算机视觉目标检测器的性能,用于自动目标分类;(2)在相同的野外地点,使用市售的相机陷阱,我们评估了megadetector(一种免费提供的物体检测模型)检测含有动物的图像的效果;(3)评估了这两种方法在野生动物监测中的互补性。我们从DeakinCams中收集了85,870个视频,从商用摄像机中收集了50,888个图像。对于DeakinCams数据的物体检测,SAWIT的准确率为98%,召回率为47%;对于物种分类,SAWIT的性能因分类群而异,鸟类的准确率和召回率为0%,蜘蛛的准确率和召回率为26%,召回率为14%。对于相机陷阱图像的目标检测,MegaDetector返回99%的精度和98%的召回率。我们发现只有迪肯摄像头能探测到夜间变温动物和无脊椎动物。利用更多样化的数据集来训练模型,以及机器学习的进步,可能会提高YOLO等模型在新环境中的性能。我们的研究结果支持持续跨学科合作的需求,以确保大型环境数据集可用于训练和测试现有和新兴的机器学习算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecosphere
Ecosphere ECOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
378
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of Ecosphere is as broad as the science of ecology itself. The journal welcomes submissions from all sub-disciplines of ecological science, as well as interdisciplinary studies relating to ecology. The journal''s goal is to provide a rapid-publication, online-only, open-access alternative to ESA''s other journals, while maintaining the rigorous standards of peer review for which ESA publications are renowned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信