Effects of Leafy Flexible Vegetation and Bedforms on Turbulent Flow and Sediment Transport

IF 3.5 2区 地球科学 Q1 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
G. Artini, S. Francalanci, L. Solari, J. Aberle
{"title":"Effects of Leafy Flexible Vegetation and Bedforms on Turbulent Flow and Sediment Transport","authors":"G. Artini,&nbsp;S. Francalanci,&nbsp;L. Solari,&nbsp;J. Aberle","doi":"10.1029/2024JF007920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent studies have shown that vegetation can trigger sediment resuspension and facilitate sediment movement, highlighting the possibility of finding a linkage between turbulence and sediment transport rates in vegetated areas. This study investigates flow hydrodynamics, through a double-averaged analysis, focusing on data that were acquired in experiments with dunes and leafy flexible vegetation characterized by different Leaf Area Indices (LAI), which denotes the total one-sided leaf area <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <msub>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\left({A}_{L}\\right)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> per unit ground area <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mfenced>\n <msub>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <mi>B</mi>\n </msub>\n </mfenced>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\left({A}_{B}\\right)$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <mi>I</mi>\n <mo>=</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>A</mi>\n <mi>B</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $LAI={A}_{L}/{A}_{B}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>). Flow velocity was measured under both fixed- and mobile-bed conditions, with the fixed-bed physical model representing the final topography from the mobile-bed experiments. The results suggest that double-averaged turbulent kinetic energy in mobile-bed conditions is approximately two to three times higher than that measured in fixed-bed conditions under comparable experimental conditions. Moreover, the spatially and depth-averaged turbulence intensity measured across various setups was correlated with a dimensionless factor derived from both dune height <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $({\\Delta })$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and wavelength <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>λ</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $(\\lambda )$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </msup>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>λ</mi>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> ${{\\Delta }}^{2}/\\lambda H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> with <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>H</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $H$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> being the water depth. This correlation remained effective in all tested setups, highlighting the dominant influence of dune geometry on turbulence compared to vegetation drag. The results show that applying turbulence-based models with depth-averaged turbulent kinetic energy leads to an underestimation of sediment transport in setups with denser vegetation, whereas near-bed values provide better agreement with measurements. Furthermore, the experimental data were used to update a turbulence-based bed-load transport model, incorporating the near-bed influence of both leafy vegetation and dunes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","volume":"130 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JF007920","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JF007920","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that vegetation can trigger sediment resuspension and facilitate sediment movement, highlighting the possibility of finding a linkage between turbulence and sediment transport rates in vegetated areas. This study investigates flow hydrodynamics, through a double-averaged analysis, focusing on data that were acquired in experiments with dunes and leafy flexible vegetation characterized by different Leaf Area Indices (LAI), which denotes the total one-sided leaf area A L $\left({A}_{L}\right)$ per unit ground area A B $\left({A}_{B}\right)$ ( L A I = A L / A B $LAI={A}_{L}/{A}_{B}$ ). Flow velocity was measured under both fixed- and mobile-bed conditions, with the fixed-bed physical model representing the final topography from the mobile-bed experiments. The results suggest that double-averaged turbulent kinetic energy in mobile-bed conditions is approximately two to three times higher than that measured in fixed-bed conditions under comparable experimental conditions. Moreover, the spatially and depth-averaged turbulence intensity measured across various setups was correlated with a dimensionless factor derived from both dune height ( Δ ) $({\Delta })$ and wavelength ( λ ) $(\lambda )$ , Δ 2 / λ H ${{\Delta }}^{2}/\lambda H$ with H $H$ being the water depth. This correlation remained effective in all tested setups, highlighting the dominant influence of dune geometry on turbulence compared to vegetation drag. The results show that applying turbulence-based models with depth-averaged turbulent kinetic energy leads to an underestimation of sediment transport in setups with denser vegetation, whereas near-bed values provide better agreement with measurements. Furthermore, the experimental data were used to update a turbulence-based bed-load transport model, incorporating the near-bed influence of both leafy vegetation and dunes.

Abstract Image

叶状柔性植被和河床对湍流和输沙的影响
最近的研究表明,植被可以触发沉积物的再悬浮和促进沉积物的运动,突出了在植被地区发现湍流和沉积物输运率之间联系的可能性。本研究以不同叶面积指数(叶面积指数,LAI)的沙丘和多叶柔性植被为研究对象,通过双平均分析对流动流体动力学进行了研究。表示单侧叶面积A L $\left({A}_{L}\right)$每单位地面面积A B$\left({A}_{B}\right)$ (L A I = A L / A B $LAI={A}_{L}/{A}_{B}$)。在固定床和移动床条件下测量流速,固定床物理模型代表移动床实验的最终地形。结果表明,在相同的实验条件下,移动床条件下的双平均湍流动能比固定床条件下的双平均湍流动能高2 ~ 3倍。而且,在不同的设置中测量的空间和深度平均湍流强度与由沙丘高度(Δ) $({\Delta })$和波长(λ) $(\lambda )$导出的无量纲因子相关, Δ 2 / λ H ${{\Delta }}^{2}/\lambda H$,其中H $H$为水深。这种相关性在所有测试设置中仍然有效,与植被阻力相比,突出了沙丘几何形状对湍流的主要影响。结果表明,在植被密集的环境中,采用基于湍流的深度平均湍流动能模型会导致沉积物输运的低估,而近床值与测量值更吻合。此外,利用实验数据更新了一个基于湍流的床质输运模型,该模型考虑了叶状植被和沙丘的近床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
10.30%
发文量
162
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信