Transferability of soil management assessment framework indices to detect best soil management strategies in tropical agroecosystems

IF 2.3 4区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Helen C. S. Amorim, Amanda J. Ashworth, Gerson L. Drescher, Mohkam Singh, Marcio R. Nunes
{"title":"Transferability of soil management assessment framework indices to detect best soil management strategies in tropical agroecosystems","authors":"Helen C. S. Amorim,&nbsp;Amanda J. Ashworth,&nbsp;Gerson L. Drescher,&nbsp;Mohkam Singh,&nbsp;Marcio R. Nunes","doi":"10.1002/ael2.70013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil management assessment framework (SMAF) algorithms have not been validated for tropical soils, which can prevent proper SMAF-based soil health monitoring. This study tested SMAF's ability to detect soil health as affected by soil management practices in the Mid-South United States and Brazil for improving SMAF performance in tropical regions. Eleven SMAF studies published in Brazil (<i>n</i> = 166) and 56 from the Mid-South United States (<i>n</i> = 500) were compiled. Management groups were perennial (PER), no-till (NT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) systems. In the United States, SMAF soil quality index decreased as follows: PER ≥ RT ≥ NT = CT, while for Brazil, PER &gt; NT = RT = CT. Macroaggregate and microbial biomass carbon scores under CT were overestimated, resulting in nonsignificant differences between conservation and conventional soil management. Revision of organic matter and textural parameters is needed to improve SMAF utilization in tropical agroecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":48502,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ael2.70013","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural & Environmental Letters","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ael2.70013","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil management assessment framework (SMAF) algorithms have not been validated for tropical soils, which can prevent proper SMAF-based soil health monitoring. This study tested SMAF's ability to detect soil health as affected by soil management practices in the Mid-South United States and Brazil for improving SMAF performance in tropical regions. Eleven SMAF studies published in Brazil (n = 166) and 56 from the Mid-South United States (n = 500) were compiled. Management groups were perennial (PER), no-till (NT), reduced tillage (RT), and conventional tillage (CT) systems. In the United States, SMAF soil quality index decreased as follows: PER ≥ RT ≥ NT = CT, while for Brazil, PER > NT = RT = CT. Macroaggregate and microbial biomass carbon scores under CT were overestimated, resulting in nonsignificant differences between conservation and conventional soil management. Revision of organic matter and textural parameters is needed to improve SMAF utilization in tropical agroecosystems.

Abstract Image

热带农业生态系统土壤管理评价框架指标可转移性研究
土壤管理评估框架(SMAF)算法尚未在热带土壤中得到验证,这可能妨碍基于SMAF的土壤健康监测。本研究在美国中南部和巴西测试了SMAF检测受土壤管理实践影响的土壤健康的能力,以改善热带地区的SMAF绩效。汇总了在巴西发表的11项SMAF研究(n = 166)和在美国中南部发表的56项研究(n = 500)。管理组为多年生(PER)、免耕(NT)、免耕(RT)和常规耕作(CT)。美国SMAF土壤质量指数递减规律为PER≥RT≥NT = CT,巴西为PER >;nt = rt = ct。CT下的大团聚体和微生物生物量碳评分被高估,导致保护与传统土壤管理之间的差异不显著。为了提高热带农业生态系统对小土壤肥力的利用,需要修正有机质和结构参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信