Chapter 2: Management of geriatric diseases and geriatric syndrome using comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA): English translation of the Japanese CGA-based healthcare guidelines 2024

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hiroyuki Umegaki, Shosuke Satake, Sinya Ishii, Taro Kojima, Hiroshi Akasaka, Sumito Ogawa, Satoru Ebihara, Yukari Tsubata, Masahiro Akishita
{"title":"Chapter 2: Management of geriatric diseases and geriatric syndrome using comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA): English translation of the Japanese CGA-based healthcare guidelines 2024","authors":"Hiroyuki Umegaki,&nbsp;Shosuke Satake,&nbsp;Sinya Ishii,&nbsp;Taro Kojima,&nbsp;Hiroshi Akasaka,&nbsp;Sumito Ogawa,&nbsp;Satoru Ebihara,&nbsp;Yukari Tsubata,&nbsp;Masahiro Akishita","doi":"10.1111/ggi.15087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Is CGA effective in frail older adults?</p><p><b>Statement: CGA is proposed to be performed on frail older adults</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence D.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 100%).</p><p>Are evaluations with assessment tools for “cognitive function” and “behavioral and psychological symptom (BPSD)” effective in the CGA for older adults with dementia?</p><p><b>Statement: The use of assessment tools of cognitive function or BPSD is recommended when performing CGA on older adults with dementia</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence C.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 88.9%).</p><p>Is CGA effective for older patients with polypharmacy?</p><p><b>Statement: Conducting CGA is proposed for older patients with polypharmacy</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence B.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 68.9%).</p><p>Is CGA effective for older patients with multimorbidity?</p><p><b>Statement: Performing CGA is recommended for older patients with multimorbidity</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence B.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 77.8%).</p><p>Is it effective to use CGA in the management of older patients with DM?</p><p><b>Statement: CGA is proposed in the management of older patients with DM</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence D.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 100%).</p><p>Is it effective to use CGA to evaluate older adults with hypertension or heart disease to determine a treatment plan?</p><p><b>Statement: CGA is proposed to evaluate older adults with hypertension or heart disease to determine a treatment plan</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence C.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 91.7%).</p><p>Is a multidisciplinary team approach based on CGA effective for treating pneumonia in older patients?</p><p><b>Statement: Regarding the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach based on CGA for older patients with pneumonia, no evidence showed direct effects, but a multidisciplinary team approach that comprehensively understands the characteristics of older patients based on CGA is important, and we look forward to future research</b>.</p><p>Is CGA screening effective for managing fractures in older adults?</p><p><b>Statement: Performing CGA is recommended in the management of older patients after fracture</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence B.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 90%).</p><p>Is it effective to use CGA to evaluate patients before surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, aortic disease, or heart disease in older adults?</p><p><b>Statement: Evaluation using CGA before surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, aortic disease, or heart disease in older patients is recommended</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence B.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 88.9%).</p><p>Is CGA effective in managing malignant tumors (systematic cancer therapy) in older patients?</p><p><b>Statement: CGA is recommended in the management of older patients with malignant tumors who are scheduled for systematic cancer therapy</b>.</p><p>Strength of evidence A.</p><p>Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 100%).</p><p>HU received research funding from the following companies: Astellas Pharma, Abbott Japan, Eisai, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, ONO, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tsumura, Pfizer Japan., Fujifilm RI Pharma, Toyama Chemical., and Mochida Pharmaceutical. IS received research funding from Sompo Care. KT received honoraria from Pfizer Japan. <b>S</b>O received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo. YT received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Kyowa Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb. MA received research funding from Astellas Pharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Merck &amp; Co., Fukuda Lifetech, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Tsumura, and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Merck &amp; Co., Toa Eiyo, and Towa Pharmaceutical. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 S1","pages":"16-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggi.15087","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.15087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is CGA effective in frail older adults?

Statement: CGA is proposed to be performed on frail older adults.

Strength of evidence D.

Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 100%).

Are evaluations with assessment tools for “cognitive function” and “behavioral and psychological symptom (BPSD)” effective in the CGA for older adults with dementia?

Statement: The use of assessment tools of cognitive function or BPSD is recommended when performing CGA on older adults with dementia.

Strength of evidence C.

Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 88.9%).

Is CGA effective for older patients with polypharmacy?

Statement: Conducting CGA is proposed for older patients with polypharmacy.

Strength of evidence B.

Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 68.9%).

Is CGA effective for older patients with multimorbidity?

Statement: Performing CGA is recommended for older patients with multimorbidity.

Strength of evidence B.

Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 77.8%).

Is it effective to use CGA in the management of older patients with DM?

Statement: CGA is proposed in the management of older patients with DM.

Strength of evidence D.

Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 100%).

Is it effective to use CGA to evaluate older adults with hypertension or heart disease to determine a treatment plan?

Statement: CGA is proposed to evaluate older adults with hypertension or heart disease to determine a treatment plan.

Strength of evidence C.

Degree of recommendation 2 (weak) (agreement rate: 91.7%).

Is a multidisciplinary team approach based on CGA effective for treating pneumonia in older patients?

Statement: Regarding the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach based on CGA for older patients with pneumonia, no evidence showed direct effects, but a multidisciplinary team approach that comprehensively understands the characteristics of older patients based on CGA is important, and we look forward to future research.

Is CGA screening effective for managing fractures in older adults?

Statement: Performing CGA is recommended in the management of older patients after fracture.

Strength of evidence B.

Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 90%).

Is it effective to use CGA to evaluate patients before surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, aortic disease, or heart disease in older adults?

Statement: Evaluation using CGA before surgery for gastrointestinal cancer, aortic disease, or heart disease in older patients is recommended.

Strength of evidence B.

Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 88.9%).

Is CGA effective in managing malignant tumors (systematic cancer therapy) in older patients?

Statement: CGA is recommended in the management of older patients with malignant tumors who are scheduled for systematic cancer therapy.

Strength of evidence A.

Degree of recommendation 1 (strong) (agreement rate: 100%).

HU received research funding from the following companies: Astellas Pharma, Abbott Japan, Eisai, MSD, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, ONO, Sanofi, Daiichi Sankyo, Sumitomo Pharma, Takeda, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Chugai Pharmaceutical, Tsumura, Pfizer Japan., Fujifilm RI Pharma, Toyama Chemical., and Mochida Pharmaceutical. IS received research funding from Sompo Care. KT received honoraria from Pfizer Japan. SO received honoraria from Daiichi Sankyo. YT received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Kyowa Kirin, Daiichi Sankyo, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb. MA received research funding from Astellas Pharma, Bayer Yakuhin, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Merck & Co., Fukuda Lifetech, Mitsubishi-Tanabe Pharma, Ono Pharmaceutical, Takeda, and Tsumura, and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo, Merck & Co., Toa Eiyo, and Towa Pharmaceutical. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信