Phonological and orthographic processing during second language typing production of Chinese-English bilinguals

IF 2.1 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Yueyue Liu , Deyang Zhang , Yongli Fu , Yanlou Liu , Wenguang He
{"title":"Phonological and orthographic processing during second language typing production of Chinese-English bilinguals","authors":"Yueyue Liu ,&nbsp;Deyang Zhang ,&nbsp;Yongli Fu ,&nbsp;Yanlou Liu ,&nbsp;Wenguang He","doi":"10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Two basic issues in written production concern whether phonology influences the output of orthography and how language processes affect the motor execution. Previous studies conducted in the native language (L1) have provided evidence for handwriting production, but less is known about how phonology and orthography work in second language (L2) typing production, and whether their work would be modulated by L2 proficiency. In the current study, the picture-word interference paradigm was adopted, in which 45 proficient (Experiment 1) and 44 non-proficient (Experiment 2) Chinese-English bilinguals were required to typewrite the English name of the picture while attempting to ignore written distractor word. The distractor word was either orthographically highly related (near-bear), phonologically highly related (chair-bear), or unrelated (cloud-bear) to the picture name (e.g., bear). The response times for the cognitive coding phase, as well as the whole response duration and the mean length of inter-keystroke intervals for the motor execution phase, were recorded. The overall results suggested that phonological and orthographic processing in the two phases might be modulated by L2 proficiency, which may be due to the differences in the quality and accessibility of phonological and orthographic representations for bilinguals with different L2 proficiency. Finally, we conducted Experiment 3 to test our interpretation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7141,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychologica","volume":"255 ","pages":"Article 104910"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychologica","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001691825002239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two basic issues in written production concern whether phonology influences the output of orthography and how language processes affect the motor execution. Previous studies conducted in the native language (L1) have provided evidence for handwriting production, but less is known about how phonology and orthography work in second language (L2) typing production, and whether their work would be modulated by L2 proficiency. In the current study, the picture-word interference paradigm was adopted, in which 45 proficient (Experiment 1) and 44 non-proficient (Experiment 2) Chinese-English bilinguals were required to typewrite the English name of the picture while attempting to ignore written distractor word. The distractor word was either orthographically highly related (near-bear), phonologically highly related (chair-bear), or unrelated (cloud-bear) to the picture name (e.g., bear). The response times for the cognitive coding phase, as well as the whole response duration and the mean length of inter-keystroke intervals for the motor execution phase, were recorded. The overall results suggested that phonological and orthographic processing in the two phases might be modulated by L2 proficiency, which may be due to the differences in the quality and accessibility of phonological and orthographic representations for bilinguals with different L2 proficiency. Finally, we conducted Experiment 3 to test our interpretation.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Psychologica
Acta Psychologica PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
274
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychologica publishes original articles and extended reviews on selected books in any area of experimental psychology. The focus of the Journal is on empirical studies and evaluative review articles that increase the theoretical understanding of human capabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信