Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot

Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jiafeng Zhu, Qian-Li Xue, Brian Buta, Thomas Laskow, Jeremy D Walston, Ravi Varadhan
{"title":"Characterization of Dynamic Adaptation to Stressors using Multi-System Stimulus-Response Data: The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging Pilot","authors":"Karen Bandeen-Roche, Jiafeng Zhu, Qian-Li Xue, Brian Buta, Thomas Laskow, Jeremy D Walston, Ravi Varadhan","doi":"10.1093/gerona/glaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Resilience to stressors has emerged as a major gerontological concept aiming to promote more positive outcomes for older adults. Achieving this aim relies on determining mechanisms underlying capacity to respond resiliently. This paper seeks proof of principle for the hypothesis that physical aspects of said capacity are rooted in the fitness of one’s physiology governing stress response, conceptualized as a dynamical system. The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging (“SPRING”) leveraged stimulus-response experiments to characterize physiological fitness in older adults scheduled for one of three major stressors: Total knee replacement, incident hemodialysis, or bone marrow transplant in hematological cancer. Here we analyze Holter monitor time series characterizing heart rate variability (HRV), cortisol responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, and repeated diurnal salivary cortisol assessment in the SPRING pilot (n=79). Principal component analysis was applied anticipating steady-state and “adaptation” mechanisms underlying the repeated physiological measures. Analytic features evidenced these mechanisms, supporting construct validity. Component scores were analyzed by major stressor, hypothesized surrogate physiologic measures (physical frailty phenotype, self-report of health), and demographic, health and behavioral characteristics. Scores differed substantially by stressor type and the surrogate physiologic measures, evidencing criterion validity. Our data support that HRV, ACTH and salivary cortisol stimulus-response data jointly assess adaptation capacity across three major stressors. We believe that SPRING is the first study in humans to concurrently query multiple physiologic systems using stimulus-response tests. Our findings lay groundwork for future validation with further data and to better forecast resilience of older adults to clinical stressors.","PeriodicalId":22892,"journal":{"name":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaf056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Resilience to stressors has emerged as a major gerontological concept aiming to promote more positive outcomes for older adults. Achieving this aim relies on determining mechanisms underlying capacity to respond resiliently. This paper seeks proof of principle for the hypothesis that physical aspects of said capacity are rooted in the fitness of one’s physiology governing stress response, conceptualized as a dynamical system. The Study of Physical Resilience in Aging (“SPRING”) leveraged stimulus-response experiments to characterize physiological fitness in older adults scheduled for one of three major stressors: Total knee replacement, incident hemodialysis, or bone marrow transplant in hematological cancer. Here we analyze Holter monitor time series characterizing heart rate variability (HRV), cortisol responses to adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation, and repeated diurnal salivary cortisol assessment in the SPRING pilot (n=79). Principal component analysis was applied anticipating steady-state and “adaptation” mechanisms underlying the repeated physiological measures. Analytic features evidenced these mechanisms, supporting construct validity. Component scores were analyzed by major stressor, hypothesized surrogate physiologic measures (physical frailty phenotype, self-report of health), and demographic, health and behavioral characteristics. Scores differed substantially by stressor type and the surrogate physiologic measures, evidencing criterion validity. Our data support that HRV, ACTH and salivary cortisol stimulus-response data jointly assess adaptation capacity across three major stressors. We believe that SPRING is the first study in humans to concurrently query multiple physiologic systems using stimulus-response tests. Our findings lay groundwork for future validation with further data and to better forecast resilience of older adults to clinical stressors.
基于多系统刺激-反应数据的应激源动态适应特征:老龄飞行员身体弹性的研究
对压力源的适应能力已经成为一个主要的老年学概念,旨在为老年人带来更多积极的结果。要实现这一目标,就必须确定具有弹性应对能力的机制。这篇论文寻求对上述能力的物理方面根植于一个人的生理控制应激反应的适应性的假设的原理证明,被概念化为一个动力系统。衰老中的身体恢复力研究(“SPRING”)利用刺激反应实验来表征老年人在三种主要压力源之一的生理适应性:全膝关节置换术,偶发性血液透析或血液学癌症的骨髓移植。在这里,我们分析了动态心电图监测时间序列特征的心率变异性(HRV),皮质醇对促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)刺激的反应,以及在SPRING试点(n=79)中重复的每日唾液皮质醇评估。应用主成分分析预测稳态和“适应”机制的重复生理措施。分析特征证明了这些机制,支持构念的有效性。通过主要压力源、假设的替代生理指标(身体虚弱表型、自我健康报告)以及人口统计学、健康和行为特征来分析成分得分。压力源类型和替代生理测量的评分差异很大,证明了标准的有效性。我们的数据支持HRV、ACTH和唾液皮质醇刺激反应数据联合评估三种主要压力源的适应能力。我们认为,SPRING是第一个在人类中同时使用刺激反应测试来查询多个生理系统的研究。我们的研究结果为进一步的数据验证奠定了基础,并为更好地预测老年人对临床压力源的适应能力奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信