Transfusion of modified whole blood versus blood components therapy in patients with severe trauma: Randomized controlled trial protocol (WEBSTER trial).

Alberto F García, Yaset Caicedo, Andrés Gempeler, Liliana Vallecilla, Carmenza Macia, Claudia Orlas, María Isabel Fernández, Paula Lancheros-Ramírez, Marcela Quintero, Edna Hernández, Sandra Vargas, Laura Cardenas-Perez, Fredy Ariza, Virginia Zarama, Sandra Carvajal, Einar Billefals, Álvaro Sánchez, Marisol Badiel, Fernando Rosso, Marcela Granados, Ludwig A Albornoz, Juan Carlos Puyana, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Carlos A Ordoñez
{"title":"Transfusion of modified whole blood versus blood components therapy in patients with severe trauma: Randomized controlled trial protocol (WEBSTER trial).","authors":"Alberto F García, Yaset Caicedo, Andrés Gempeler, Liliana Vallecilla, Carmenza Macia, Claudia Orlas, María Isabel Fernández, Paula Lancheros-Ramírez, Marcela Quintero, Edna Hernández, Sandra Vargas, Laura Cardenas-Perez, Fredy Ariza, Virginia Zarama, Sandra Carvajal, Einar Billefals, Álvaro Sánchez, Marisol Badiel, Fernando Rosso, Marcela Granados, Ludwig A Albornoz, Juan Carlos Puyana, Gustavo Ospina-Tascón, Carlos A Ordoñez","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care. Conventional hemostatic resuscitation often involves a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion maintains a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components. An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 3 units of whole blood or 3 units each of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, plus half an apheresis unit of platelets (equivalent to 3 platelet units). A second intervention of the same ratio will be administered if further transfusion is required. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion and complications related to trauma (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05634109 - Whole Blood in Trauma Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock (WEBSTER).</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hemostatic resuscitation is a mainstay in the management of trauma patients. Factors such as blood loss and tissue injury contribute to coagulation and hemodynamic status imbalances. Hemorrhage remains a leading cause of death in trauma patients, despite advances in strategies such as damage control surgery, massive transfusion protocol, and intensive care. Conventional hemostatic resuscitation often involves a 1:1:1 ratio of red blood cells, plasma, and platelets. However, this ratio has disadvantages, especially in low-resource settings. Whole blood transfusion maintains a physiological rate of cells, clotting factors, and hemostatic properties. Advances in the whole blood elucidated a new opportunity for its implementation in civilian trauma centers. However, the effect of initial resuscitation with whole blood in trauma patients is unclear. This study aims to determine the effect of hemostatic resuscitation using whole blood on mortality and evolution of organ dysfunction in severe trauma patients compared to blood components therapy. This clinical trial attempts to resolve the debate and uncertainty of using whole blood vs. blood components. An open-label, randomized, prospective, single-center and controlled trial will be performed. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either 3 units of whole blood or 3 units each of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma, plus half an apheresis unit of platelets (equivalent to 3 platelet units). A second intervention of the same ratio will be administered if further transfusion is required. The primary outcome is a hierarchical composite outcome based on mortality at 28 days and the evolution of organ dysfunction. Organ dysfunction will be measured as the difference in the score between the fifth and first days of the SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment). Secondary outcomes are mortality, coagulopathy profile, intensive care unit free days, length of hospital stay, and volumes of transfusion requirements. Safety outcomes are complications related to transfusion and complications related to trauma (acute distress respiratory syndrome, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, acute kidney injury with or without dialysis, stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, sepsis, abdominal complications, abdominal compartment syndrome). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05634109 - Whole Blood in Trauma Patients with Hemorrhagic Shock (WEBSTER).

严重创伤患者输注改良全血与血液成分疗法:随机对照试验方案(WEBSTER 试验)。
止血复苏是治疗创伤患者的主要手段。失血和组织损伤等因素会导致凝血和血液动力学状态失衡。尽管损伤控制手术、大量输血方案和重症监护等策略取得了进步,但大出血仍是导致创伤患者死亡的主要原因。传统的止血复苏通常采用红细胞、血浆和血小板 1:1:1 的比例。然而,这种比例有其缺点,尤其是在资源匮乏的情况下。全血输注可保持细胞、凝血因子和止血特性的生理比例。全血的进步为在民用创伤中心实施全血提供了新的机遇。然而,用全血对创伤患者进行初步复苏的效果尚不明确。本研究旨在确定与血液成分疗法相比,使用全血进行止血复苏对严重创伤患者死亡率和器官功能障碍演变的影响。这项临床试验试图解决使用全血与血液成分的争议和不确定性。将进行一项开放标签、随机、前瞻性、单中心对照试验。参与者将被随机分配接受 3 个单位的全血,或各 3 个单位的红细胞和新鲜冰冻血浆,外加半个单位的血小板(相当于 3 个血小板单位)。如果需要进一步输血,将进行相同比例的第二次干预。主要结果是基于 28 天死亡率和器官功能障碍演变情况的分层综合结果。器官功能障碍将以第五天和第一天的 SOFA(序贯器官衰竭评估)得分差异来衡量。次要结果包括死亡率、凝血功能障碍情况、无重症监护室天数、住院时间和输血需求量。安全性结果包括与输血相关的并发症和与创伤相关的并发症(急性窘迫呼吸综合征、肺栓塞、深静脉血栓、急性肾损伤(伴有或不伴有透析)、中风、心肌梗塞、心脏骤停、败血症、腹部并发症、腹腔隔室综合征)。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05634109 - 出血性休克创伤患者的全血(WEBSTER)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信