Impact of Different Greenspace Metrics on Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Urban Settings: A Comparative Analysis.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ruoyu Dong, Hong Yuan, Gang Xu, Yuchen Li, Yanqing Xu, Cong Fu
{"title":"Impact of Different Greenspace Metrics on Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Urban Settings: A Comparative Analysis.","authors":"Ruoyu Dong, Hong Yuan, Gang Xu, Yuchen Li, Yanqing Xu, Cong Fu","doi":"10.1007/s11524-025-00971-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of global mortality, and urban greenspace can reduce CVDs risk. However, the evidence relating various greenspace metrics to CVDs risk is inconclusive. To enhance the understanding of the correlation between greenspace and CVDs, we compared three greenspace indicators-street view-based greenspace (SVG), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and green cover rate (GCR). We used a large sample of 36,504 CVDs hospitalization records with precise residential addresses from 2017 to 2022 in Jingzhou, China. Employing the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, we investigated the association between greenspace and CVDs incidence at the population level. We found significant negative associations between NDVI/SVG and CVDs incidence (SVG: β = - 1.64; 95% CI, [- 2.12, - 1.15]; NDVI: β = - 8.57; 95% CI, [- 9.81, - 7.33]), with NDVI exhibiting a more substantial protective effect. However, no significant relationship was found in GCR (p = 0.161). The impacts varied by age, but not by gender, with younger individuals benefiting more than the elderly, and SVG showed no significant relationship with CVDs incidence in individuals over 65 years. Our findings suggested the importance of the presence of greenspace in CVDs prevention. Consequently, in urban greenspace planning, priority should be given to the vegetation quantity in residential areas over the size of greenspace facilities located distant from residences.</p>","PeriodicalId":49964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-025-00971-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of global mortality, and urban greenspace can reduce CVDs risk. However, the evidence relating various greenspace metrics to CVDs risk is inconclusive. To enhance the understanding of the correlation between greenspace and CVDs, we compared three greenspace indicators-street view-based greenspace (SVG), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and green cover rate (GCR). We used a large sample of 36,504 CVDs hospitalization records with precise residential addresses from 2017 to 2022 in Jingzhou, China. Employing the geographically weighted regression (GWR) model, we investigated the association between greenspace and CVDs incidence at the population level. We found significant negative associations between NDVI/SVG and CVDs incidence (SVG: β = - 1.64; 95% CI, [- 2.12, - 1.15]; NDVI: β = - 8.57; 95% CI, [- 9.81, - 7.33]), with NDVI exhibiting a more substantial protective effect. However, no significant relationship was found in GCR (p = 0.161). The impacts varied by age, but not by gender, with younger individuals benefiting more than the elderly, and SVG showed no significant relationship with CVDs incidence in individuals over 65 years. Our findings suggested the importance of the presence of greenspace in CVDs prevention. Consequently, in urban greenspace planning, priority should be given to the vegetation quantity in residential areas over the size of greenspace facilities located distant from residences.

不同绿地指标对城市心血管疾病发病率影响的比较分析
心血管疾病(cvd)是全球死亡的主要原因,城市绿地可以降低cvd的风险。然而,各种绿色空间指标与心血管疾病风险之间的关系尚无定论。为了更好地理解绿地与cvd之间的关系,我们比较了三个绿地指标——基于街景的绿地(SVG)、归一化植被指数(NDVI)和绿色覆盖率(GCR)。我们使用了中国荆州2017年至2022年36,504份具有精确居住地址的心血管疾病住院记录的大样本。采用地理加权回归(GWR)模型,在人口水平上研究了绿地与心血管疾病发病率的关系。我们发现NDVI/SVG与cvd发病率呈显著负相关(SVG: β = - 1.64;95% ci, [- 2.12, - 1.15];Ndvi: β = - 8.57;95% CI, [- 9.81, - 7.33]), NDVI表现出更显著的保护作用。但GCR之间无显著相关(p = 0.161)。影响因年龄而异,但不受性别的影响,年轻人比老年人受益更多,SVG与65岁以上个体的心血管疾病发病率没有显著关系。我们的研究结果表明,绿色空间的存在在心血管疾病预防中的重要性。因此,在城市绿地规划中,应优先考虑居住区的植被数量,而不是远离居民区的绿地设施的规模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine
Journal of Urban Health-Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.00%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Health is the premier and authoritative source of rigorous analyses to advance the health and well-being of people in cities. The Journal provides a platform for interdisciplinary exploration of the evidence base for the broader determinants of health and health inequities needed to strengthen policies, programs, and governance for urban health. The Journal publishes original data, case studies, commentaries, book reviews, executive summaries of selected reports, and proceedings from important global meetings. It welcomes submissions presenting new analytic methods, including systems science approaches to urban problem solving. Finally, the Journal provides a forum linking scholars, practitioners, civil society, and policy makers from the multiple sectors that can influence the health of urban populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信