Psychostimulant Substitution Therapy for the Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorders in Patients with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Dual Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.1080/15504263.2025.2478897
Cynthia Ramasubbu, Sukhpreet Poonia, Erin Brady-Randle, Christian G Schutz, Reza Rafizadeh
{"title":"Psychostimulant Substitution Therapy for the Treatment of Stimulant Use Disorders in Patients with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective Disorder: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Cynthia Ramasubbu, Sukhpreet Poonia, Erin Brady-Randle, Christian G Schutz, Reza Rafizadeh","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2478897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Co-occurrence of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SSD) and stimulant use disorder (StUD) is an ongoing clinical problem and can lead to poor outcomes. Although emerging evidence has suggested psychostimulant substitution therapy may result in improved outcomes in those with StUD, the efficacy and safety of psychostimulant substitution therapy for StUD in those with concurrent SSD is uncertain. This review aims to systematically find and assess all available efficacy and safety evidence on the use of prescription psychostimulants in those with co-occurring SSD and StUD. <b>Methods:</b> Electronic searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, EU Clinical Trials, and CADTH were conducted from inception to February 27, 2024. Any study design was accepted if they involved the following concepts 1) SSD and StUD and 2) prescription psychostimulants. Given the paucity of trials meeting criteria, outcomes of interest were described qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed using Q-Coh and ROB2. <b>Results:</b> Only seven articles met criteria, and most of these were case reports and series. The single RCT included was at high risk of bias. Outcomes included abstinence, reductions in non-prescribed stimulant use, psychiatric hospitalizations, levels of craving, improvements in mental health, improvements in psychosocial functioning, adherence to antipsychotic medications, and retention in treatment. Most of the results indicated that psychostimulant substitution therapy in individuals with SSD-StUD was not associated with improved outcomes. <b>Conclusion:</b> Available evidence for treatment of StUD via psychostimulant substitution therapy in individuals with SSD is lacking. More exploration is required for this clinical question to allow for current practice to be backed by evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"167-181"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2478897","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Co-occurrence of schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder (SSD) and stimulant use disorder (StUD) is an ongoing clinical problem and can lead to poor outcomes. Although emerging evidence has suggested psychostimulant substitution therapy may result in improved outcomes in those with StUD, the efficacy and safety of psychostimulant substitution therapy for StUD in those with concurrent SSD is uncertain. This review aims to systematically find and assess all available efficacy and safety evidence on the use of prescription psychostimulants in those with co-occurring SSD and StUD. Methods: Electronic searches of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, ClinicalTrials, EU Clinical Trials, and CADTH were conducted from inception to February 27, 2024. Any study design was accepted if they involved the following concepts 1) SSD and StUD and 2) prescription psychostimulants. Given the paucity of trials meeting criteria, outcomes of interest were described qualitatively. Risk of bias was assessed using Q-Coh and ROB2. Results: Only seven articles met criteria, and most of these were case reports and series. The single RCT included was at high risk of bias. Outcomes included abstinence, reductions in non-prescribed stimulant use, psychiatric hospitalizations, levels of craving, improvements in mental health, improvements in psychosocial functioning, adherence to antipsychotic medications, and retention in treatment. Most of the results indicated that psychostimulant substitution therapy in individuals with SSD-StUD was not associated with improved outcomes. Conclusion: Available evidence for treatment of StUD via psychostimulant substitution therapy in individuals with SSD is lacking. More exploration is required for this clinical question to allow for current practice to be backed by evidence.

精神兴奋剂替代疗法治疗精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者兴奋剂使用障碍:系统综述。
目的:精神分裂症/分裂情感性障碍(SSD)和兴奋剂使用障碍(StUD)共存是一个持续存在的临床问题,可能导致不良预后。尽管新出现的证据表明,精神兴奋剂替代疗法可能会改善StUD患者的预后,但对于并发SSD的StUD患者,精神兴奋剂替代疗法的有效性和安全性尚不确定。本综述旨在系统地寻找和评估所有可用的处方精神兴奋剂用于并发SSD和StUD患者的有效性和安全性证据。方法:自成立至2024年2月27日,对MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Embase、Scopus、ClinicalTrials、EU ClinicalTrials和CADTH进行电子检索。任何涉及以下概念的研究设计都被接受:1)SSD和StUD; 2)处方精神兴奋剂。考虑到符合标准的试验的缺乏,对感兴趣的结果进行了定性描述。采用Q-Coh和ROB2评估偏倚风险。结果:只有7篇文章符合标准,其中大多数是病例报告和系列。纳入的单个RCT存在高偏倚风险。结果包括戒断、减少非处方兴奋剂的使用、精神病住院治疗、渴望程度、精神健康改善、社会心理功能改善、坚持使用抗精神病药物和坚持治疗。大多数结果表明,精神兴奋剂替代治疗与SSD-StUD患者的预后改善无关。结论:目前尚无证据表明SSD患者通过精神兴奋剂替代疗法治疗StUD。这个临床问题需要更多的探索,以使当前的实践得到证据的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
13.60%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信