Favorable Cerebral Collateral Cascades Improve Futile Recanalization by Reducing Ischemic Core Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Liping Huang, Shuyu Jiang, Chen Gong, Gang Wu, Jing Guo, Jin Liu, Jinxian Yuan, You Wang, Tao Xu, Chang Liu, Shengli Chen, Yangmei Chen
{"title":"Favorable Cerebral Collateral Cascades Improve Futile Recanalization by Reducing Ischemic Core Volume in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Undergoing Endovascular Treatment.","authors":"Liping Huang, Shuyu Jiang, Chen Gong, Gang Wu, Jing Guo, Jin Liu, Jinxian Yuan, You Wang, Tao Xu, Chang Liu, Shengli Chen, Yangmei Chen","doi":"10.1007/s12975-025-01340-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although endovascular treatment (EVT) was the first-line therapeutic strategy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), half of the patients could not achieve functional independence. Previous studies suggested arterial collateral was an important predictor of this phenomenon. However, cerebral collateral circulation was regulated by arteries, venous, and microcirculation, and its role remained unclear. Therefore, based on the integrated cerebral collateral cascade (CCC) system, this study aimed to explore the relationship and potential mechanisms between CCC and futile recanalization. This was a multicenter retrospective study for AIS patients receiving EVT. The CCC model was used to comprehensively assess the collateral circulation, which consisted of arterial collaterals, venous outflow, and tissue-level collaterals. Imaging outcomes included ischemic core, hypoperfusion volume, and penumbra volume. The clinical outcome was futile recanalization, defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6 after successful recanalization. Multivariate regression and mediation analyses were used to assess the relationship between CCC, futile recanalization, and potential mediators. Among 513 patients with successful recanalization, 50.6% (260) experienced futile recanalization. In the multivariable regression analysis, favorable CCC (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75; P = 0.001) was independently associated with unfavorable outcome despite successful recanalization. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed that favorable CCC significantly reduced the ischemic core accounting for 27.62% (95% CI 9.69-66.00%) of its beneficial effect on futile recanalization. The benefit of favorable CCC on futile recanalization may be mediated by a reduction in ischemic core volume in AIS patients undergoing EVT. Our findings deepen the understanding of futile recanalization and microcirculation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23237,"journal":{"name":"Translational Stroke Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Stroke Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-025-01340-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although endovascular treatment (EVT) was the first-line therapeutic strategy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), half of the patients could not achieve functional independence. Previous studies suggested arterial collateral was an important predictor of this phenomenon. However, cerebral collateral circulation was regulated by arteries, venous, and microcirculation, and its role remained unclear. Therefore, based on the integrated cerebral collateral cascade (CCC) system, this study aimed to explore the relationship and potential mechanisms between CCC and futile recanalization. This was a multicenter retrospective study for AIS patients receiving EVT. The CCC model was used to comprehensively assess the collateral circulation, which consisted of arterial collaterals, venous outflow, and tissue-level collaterals. Imaging outcomes included ischemic core, hypoperfusion volume, and penumbra volume. The clinical outcome was futile recanalization, defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 3-6 after successful recanalization. Multivariate regression and mediation analyses were used to assess the relationship between CCC, futile recanalization, and potential mediators. Among 513 patients with successful recanalization, 50.6% (260) experienced futile recanalization. In the multivariable regression analysis, favorable CCC (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.31-0.75; P = 0.001) was independently associated with unfavorable outcome despite successful recanalization. Furthermore, mediation analysis revealed that favorable CCC significantly reduced the ischemic core accounting for 27.62% (95% CI 9.69-66.00%) of its beneficial effect on futile recanalization. The benefit of favorable CCC on futile recanalization may be mediated by a reduction in ischemic core volume in AIS patients undergoing EVT. Our findings deepen the understanding of futile recanalization and microcirculation.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Translational Stroke Research
Translational Stroke Research CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Translational Stroke Research covers basic, translational, and clinical studies. The Journal emphasizes novel approaches to help both to understand clinical phenomenon through basic science tools, and to translate basic science discoveries into the development of new strategies for the prevention, assessment, treatment, and enhancement of central nervous system repair after stroke and other forms of neurotrauma. Translational Stroke Research focuses on translational research and is relevant to both basic scientists and physicians, including but not restricted to neuroscientists, vascular biologists, neurologists, neuroimagers, and neurosurgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信