Chao Li, Hong Li, Xiangning Meng, Beiyu Xu, Yao Zhao, Longtao Qi, Chunde Li, Yu Wang
{"title":"The Application of 3D-Printed Microporous Laminae in Kyphosis Correction Surgery for Ankylosing Spondylitis: Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Chao Li, Hong Li, Xiangning Meng, Beiyu Xu, Yao Zhao, Longtao Qi, Chunde Li, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study designed an innovative 3D-printed microporous lamina and aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of kyphosis correction surgery for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal osteotomy is a widely employed treatment for severe kyphotic deformities in AS. However, mitigating complications associated with osteotomy remains a significant clinical challenge.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 72 consecutive patients with AS who underwent kyphosis correction surgery were analyzed. Customized 3D-printed microporous laminae were designed based on preoperative imaging and three-dimensional modeling of each patient's spinal anatomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (25 patients), treated with the 3D-printed microporous lamina technique, and group B (47 patients), treated using the traditional technique. Radiologic assessments included bone fusion rate, global kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, osteotomy angle, pelvic index, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis. Clinical outcomes assessed were surgery-related complications, reoperation rates, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bone fusion rate in the 3D-printed microporous lamina group was 96%. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgery-related complications, reoperation rate, estimated blood loss, postoperative stay, global kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, osteotomy angle, pelvic index, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis, or Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22. Although the mean operative time was longer in group A than in group B, this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of 3D-printed microporous laminae in kyphosis correction surgery for AS provides a promising method for achieving high bone fusion rates through effective laminar reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"981-989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective study.
Objective: This study designed an innovative 3D-printed microporous lamina and aimed to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of kyphosis correction surgery for patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).
Background: Spinal osteotomy is a widely employed treatment for severe kyphotic deformities in AS. However, mitigating complications associated with osteotomy remains a significant clinical challenge.
Materials and methods: A total of 72 consecutive patients with AS who underwent kyphosis correction surgery were analyzed. Customized 3D-printed microporous laminae were designed based on preoperative imaging and three-dimensional modeling of each patient's spinal anatomy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (25 patients), treated with the 3D-printed microporous lamina technique, and group B (47 patients), treated using the traditional technique. Radiologic assessments included bone fusion rate, global kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, osteotomy angle, pelvic index, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and sagittal vertical axis. Clinical outcomes assessed were surgery-related complications, reoperation rates, operative time, estimated blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22. All patients were followed up for at least 2 years postoperatively.
Results: The bone fusion rate in the 3D-printed microporous lamina group was 96%. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of surgery-related complications, reoperation rate, estimated blood loss, postoperative stay, global kyphosis, thoracolumbar kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, osteotomy angle, pelvic index, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis, or Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument-22. Although the mean operative time was longer in group A than in group B, this difference was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: The use of 3D-printed microporous laminae in kyphosis correction surgery for AS provides a promising method for achieving high bone fusion rates through effective laminar reconstruction.
期刊介绍:
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store.
Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.