Cardiometabolic Benefit of Replacing Sedentary Time with Light-Intensity Physical Activity: Compositional Data Analysis of the Nijmegen Exercise Study.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Koen M van der Sluijs, Janneke I A Vloet, Dick H J Thijssen, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Esmée A Bakker
{"title":"Cardiometabolic Benefit of Replacing Sedentary Time with Light-Intensity Physical Activity: Compositional Data Analysis of the Nijmegen Exercise Study.","authors":"Koen M van der Sluijs, Janneke I A Vloet, Dick H J Thijssen, Thijs M H Eijsvogels, Esmée A Bakker","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The cardiometabolic benefits of replacing sedentary time with light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) are unclear. We studied the associations of hypothetically reallocating sedentary time towards LIPA with changes in cardiometabolic risk factors using thigh-worn accelerometery. We also explored whether reallocation effects differed across subgroups with low, moderate, and high sedentary time and compared proportionally similar reallocations to either LIPA or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We assessed physical behaviours across eight consecutive days using thigh-worn accelerometers among adults from the Nijmegen Exercise Study. Multiple cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed and categorised as: 1) anthropometrics, 2) cardiovascular biomarkers, and 3) glucose metabolism. Reallocation effects were estimated for each cardiometabolic risk factor using compositional isotemporal substitution models adjusted for confounders. Analyses were repeated in sedentary time subgroups, i.e. <8.5, 8.5-10, and > 10 hours/day.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 1,041 participants (64 (standard deviation 11) years; 39.5% female). Reallocating sedentary time towards LIPA was associated with improvements in anthropometrics, some cardiovascular biomarkers, and glucose metabolism; e.g., replacing 60 minutes/day of sedentary time with LIPA was associated with improvements in BMI (-0.28 (-0.42, -0.13) kg/m 2 ), eGFR (0.68 (0.15, 1.20) mL/min/1.73m 2 ), and glucose (-0.05 (-0.08, -0.03) mmol/L). Trends suggested that reallocation benefits were strongest in those with >8.5 hours/day of sedentary time. Proportionally similar replacements of sedentary time with either LIPA or MVPA were associated with similar cardiometabolic benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reallocation of sedentary time to LIPA was associated with improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, predominantly in anthropometrics and glucose metabolism, with greater benefits in the most sedentary individuals. Time reallocation from sedentary time to LIPA may be an effective and arguably feasible strategy to improve population-wide cardiometabolic health.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003705","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The cardiometabolic benefits of replacing sedentary time with light-intensity physical activity (LIPA) are unclear. We studied the associations of hypothetically reallocating sedentary time towards LIPA with changes in cardiometabolic risk factors using thigh-worn accelerometery. We also explored whether reallocation effects differed across subgroups with low, moderate, and high sedentary time and compared proportionally similar reallocations to either LIPA or moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA).

Methods: We assessed physical behaviours across eight consecutive days using thigh-worn accelerometers among adults from the Nijmegen Exercise Study. Multiple cardiometabolic risk factors were assessed and categorised as: 1) anthropometrics, 2) cardiovascular biomarkers, and 3) glucose metabolism. Reallocation effects were estimated for each cardiometabolic risk factor using compositional isotemporal substitution models adjusted for confounders. Analyses were repeated in sedentary time subgroups, i.e. <8.5, 8.5-10, and > 10 hours/day.

Results: We included 1,041 participants (64 (standard deviation 11) years; 39.5% female). Reallocating sedentary time towards LIPA was associated with improvements in anthropometrics, some cardiovascular biomarkers, and glucose metabolism; e.g., replacing 60 minutes/day of sedentary time with LIPA was associated with improvements in BMI (-0.28 (-0.42, -0.13) kg/m 2 ), eGFR (0.68 (0.15, 1.20) mL/min/1.73m 2 ), and glucose (-0.05 (-0.08, -0.03) mmol/L). Trends suggested that reallocation benefits were strongest in those with >8.5 hours/day of sedentary time. Proportionally similar replacements of sedentary time with either LIPA or MVPA were associated with similar cardiometabolic benefits.

Conclusions: Reallocation of sedentary time to LIPA was associated with improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors, predominantly in anthropometrics and glucose metabolism, with greater benefits in the most sedentary individuals. Time reallocation from sedentary time to LIPA may be an effective and arguably feasible strategy to improve population-wide cardiometabolic health.

用轻强度体育锻炼代替久坐对心脏代谢的益处:奈梅亨运动研究的组成数据分析》。
目的:以低强度体力活动(LIPA)取代久坐时间的心脏代谢益处尚不清楚。我们使用穿戴式加速计研究了重新分配久坐时间与LIPA与心脏代谢危险因素变化之间的关联。我们还探讨了低、中等和高久坐时间亚组的再分配效果是否不同,并比较了LIPA或中高强度体育活动(MVPA)的再分配比例。方法:我们使用来自奈梅亨运动研究的成人大腿穿戴式加速度计,连续8天评估他们的身体行为。评估多种心脏代谢危险因素并将其分类为:1)人体测量学,2)心血管生物标志物和3)葡萄糖代谢。使用经混杂因素调整的组成等时间替代模型估计每个心脏代谢危险因素的再分配效应。在久坐时间亚组中重复分析,即每天10小时。结果:我们纳入了1,041名参与者(64(标准差11)岁;39.5%的女性)。将久坐时间重新分配给LIPA与人体测量学、一些心血管生物标志物和葡萄糖代谢的改善有关;例如,用LIPA代替60分钟/天的久坐时间与BMI (-0.28 (-0.42, -0.13) kg/m2)、eGFR (0.68 (0.15, 1.20) mL/min/1.73m2)和葡萄糖(-0.05 (-0.08,-0.03)mmol/L)的改善相关。趋势表明,在每天静坐8.5小时的人群中,再分配的好处最大。用LIPA或MVPA替代久坐时间的比例相似,与类似的心脏代谢益处相关。结论:将久坐时间重新分配到LIPA与心脏代谢危险因素的改善有关,主要是人体测量学和葡萄糖代谢,对最久坐的个体有更大的益处。从久坐时间到LIPA的时间重新分配可能是一种有效且可行的策略,可以改善人群的心脏代谢健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信