Two-flip Mathieu's technique in distal hypospadias with small glans.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Vikesh Agrawal, Ramesh Babu
{"title":"Two-flip Mathieu's technique in distal hypospadias with small glans.","authors":"Vikesh Agrawal, Ramesh Babu","doi":"10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.02.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hypospadias repair can be complicated, especially with poorly developed glans. This study evaluates the outcomes of the Two-Flip Mathieu (TFM) procedure, which aims to reinforce the glans and reduce dehiscence in patients with small glans, comparing it to conventional Mathieu's repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed case records of patients with distal hypospadias and minimal ventral curvature. Preoperative evaluations included assessments of meatal location, glans and urethral plate width, perimeatal skin quality, and presence of chordee. Patients with small glans (<14 mm) received hormonal stimulation using intramuscular testosterone. Surgical choices were based on urethral plate and glans morphology: patients with good urethral plates and glans underwent TIP repair (excluded), those with poor urethral plates and good glans widths underwent conventional Mathieu repair (Group 1), and those with both poor urethral plates and glans widths received TFM repair (Group 2). Postoperative assessments focused on meatal position, fistula formation, glans dehiscence at regular intervals, and patient satisfaction, which was measured using a 5-point Likert scale covering meatal appearance, glans aesthetics, urinary stream, and overall cosmetic satisfaction at 6 month follow-ups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the two-year study period (2021-2023), 73 patients with distal hypospadias were treated. After excluding 22 patients who underwent TIP repair, 51 were divided into two groups. Group 1 (20 patients) underwent conventional Mathieu repair, while Group 2 (28 patients) received TFM repair. In the TFM group, 2 patients (7.1 %) developed urethrocutaneous fistulas, with one requiring surgery. Three patients (10.7 %) experienced superficial necrosis, managed conservatively. TFM had no cases of glans dehiscence, whereas conventional Mathieu repair showed significant dehiscence (p = 0.0343). Re-operation rates were lower in TFM (p = 0.0148). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in TFM for glans aesthetics and overall appearance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Glans size and urethral plate quality are key factors in hypospadias repair. The TFM technique addresses limitations in conventional Mathieu repair by reinforcing the glans, reducing tension on the neo-urethra, and improving outcomes. Though initial color mismatch between the V-flap and glans is a limitation, cosmetic satisfaction was excellent at 6 month follow-up. TFM is unsuitable for patients with distal urethral hypoplasia and thin perimeatal skin but enhances the versatility of Mathieu repair in cases with poor glans quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":16747,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.02.035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Hypospadias repair can be complicated, especially with poorly developed glans. This study evaluates the outcomes of the Two-Flip Mathieu (TFM) procedure, which aims to reinforce the glans and reduce dehiscence in patients with small glans, comparing it to conventional Mathieu's repair.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed case records of patients with distal hypospadias and minimal ventral curvature. Preoperative evaluations included assessments of meatal location, glans and urethral plate width, perimeatal skin quality, and presence of chordee. Patients with small glans (<14 mm) received hormonal stimulation using intramuscular testosterone. Surgical choices were based on urethral plate and glans morphology: patients with good urethral plates and glans underwent TIP repair (excluded), those with poor urethral plates and good glans widths underwent conventional Mathieu repair (Group 1), and those with both poor urethral plates and glans widths received TFM repair (Group 2). Postoperative assessments focused on meatal position, fistula formation, glans dehiscence at regular intervals, and patient satisfaction, which was measured using a 5-point Likert scale covering meatal appearance, glans aesthetics, urinary stream, and overall cosmetic satisfaction at 6 month follow-ups.

Results: During the two-year study period (2021-2023), 73 patients with distal hypospadias were treated. After excluding 22 patients who underwent TIP repair, 51 were divided into two groups. Group 1 (20 patients) underwent conventional Mathieu repair, while Group 2 (28 patients) received TFM repair. In the TFM group, 2 patients (7.1 %) developed urethrocutaneous fistulas, with one requiring surgery. Three patients (10.7 %) experienced superficial necrosis, managed conservatively. TFM had no cases of glans dehiscence, whereas conventional Mathieu repair showed significant dehiscence (p = 0.0343). Re-operation rates were lower in TFM (p = 0.0148). Patient satisfaction was significantly higher in TFM for glans aesthetics and overall appearance.

Discussion: Glans size and urethral plate quality are key factors in hypospadias repair. The TFM technique addresses limitations in conventional Mathieu repair by reinforcing the glans, reducing tension on the neo-urethra, and improving outcomes. Though initial color mismatch between the V-flap and glans is a limitation, cosmetic satisfaction was excellent at 6 month follow-up. TFM is unsuitable for patients with distal urethral hypoplasia and thin perimeatal skin but enhances the versatility of Mathieu repair in cases with poor glans quality.

双翻Mathieu技术治疗伴小龟头的尿道下裂远端。
尿道下裂的修复是复杂的,特别是对于发育不良的龟头。本研究评估了双翻转Mathieu (TFM)手术的结果,该手术旨在加强龟头并减少小龟头患者的龟裂,并将其与传统的Mathieu修复进行比较。方法:回顾性分析尿道下裂远端伴腹侧弯曲患者的病例记录。术前评估包括评估金属位置、龟头和尿道板宽度、金属周围皮肤质量和脊索的存在。结果:在两年的研究期间(2021-2023),73例远端尿道下裂患者接受了治疗。在排除22例行TIP修复的患者后,51例分为两组。组1(20例)采用常规Mathieu修复,组2(28例)采用TFM修复。在TFM组中,2例(7.1%)患者出现尿道瘘,其中1例需要手术。3例(10.7%)出现浅表坏死,采用保守治疗。TFM无龟头开裂病例,而传统Mathieu修复有明显龟头开裂(p = 0.0343)。TFM组再手术率较低(p = 0.0148)。患者满意度在TFM的龟头美学和整体外观显著较高。讨论:龟头大小和尿道板质量是尿道下裂修复的关键因素。TFM技术通过加强龟头,减少新尿道的张力和改善结果,解决了传统Mathieu修复的局限性。虽然最初v型皮瓣和龟头之间的颜色不匹配是有限的,但在6个月的随访中,美容满意度非常好。TFM不适用于尿道远端发育不全和周围皮肤薄的患者,但在龟头质量差的病例中,TFM增强了Mathieu修复的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pediatric Urology
Journal of Pediatric Urology PEDIATRICS-UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
15.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pediatric Urology publishes submitted research and clinical articles relating to Pediatric Urology which have been accepted after adequate peer review. It publishes regular articles that have been submitted after invitation, that cover the curriculum of Pediatric Urology, and enable trainee surgeons to attain theoretical competence of the sub-specialty. It publishes regular reviews of pediatric urological articles appearing in other journals. It publishes invited review articles by recognised experts on modern or controversial aspects of the sub-specialty. It enables any affiliated society to advertise society events or information in the journal without charge and will publish abstracts of papers to be read at society meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信