From waste to wellness - what women want: insights into patient perspectives on topical vaginal estrogen applicators and environmental considerations.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ana Sofia Da Silva, Miriam O'Kane, Cathy Davis, Angie Rantell, George Araklitis, Dudley Robinson
{"title":"From waste to wellness - what women want: insights into patient perspectives on topical vaginal estrogen applicators and environmental considerations.","authors":"Ana Sofia Da Silva, Miriam O'Kane, Cathy Davis, Angie Rantell, George Araklitis, Dudley Robinson","doi":"10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Environmental consciousness and the role of plastic waste are increasing. Topical vaginal estrogen prescription can be prescribed with one reusable plastic applicator or multiple single-use plastic applicators. User preference about the role of plastic in personal healthcare is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the applicator and environmental considerations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A mixed-methods questionnaire was employed to assess users' experience with topical vaginal estrogen applicators and their views on the environment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-two respondents had previously used estriol 0.1% cream and 77 had used estradiol 10 μg vaginal inserts. The mean age of participants was 67.3 years. The mean duration of use was 36.5 months, and the discontinuation rate was 26.1% and 29.9% for estriol 0.1% cream and estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users, respectively. Satisfaction with applicators and ease of use were similar in both groups. There was a higher report of the product being 'messy' (38.0% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.026) and 'not hygienic' (48.9% vs. 18.2%; <i>p</i> < 0.001) by estriol 0.1% cream users compared to estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users. Women aged <65 years demonstrated a greater concern about plastic use and the impact on the environment compared to women aged over 65 years (81.0% vs. 56.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.002). The younger cohort showed a preference for reusable applicators (66.2%) compared to single-use applicators (33.8%) (<i>p =</i> 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in preference for women aged over 65 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that younger postmenopausal women showed greater concern for plastic waste and its impact on the environment, with a preference for reusable products. Manufacturers of health products and prescribers should be aware of this growing trend. With similar overall satisfaction and side-effect profiles, users should be made aware of the different types of applicators available to help support an informed decision.</p>","PeriodicalId":10213,"journal":{"name":"Climacteric","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Climacteric","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2025.2473431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Environmental consciousness and the role of plastic waste are increasing. Topical vaginal estrogen prescription can be prescribed with one reusable plastic applicator or multiple single-use plastic applicators. User preference about the role of plastic in personal healthcare is not fully understood. This study aimed to explore patients' perspectives on the applicator and environmental considerations.

Method: A mixed-methods questionnaire was employed to assess users' experience with topical vaginal estrogen applicators and their views on the environment.

Results: Ninety-two respondents had previously used estriol 0.1% cream and 77 had used estradiol 10 μg vaginal inserts. The mean age of participants was 67.3 years. The mean duration of use was 36.5 months, and the discontinuation rate was 26.1% and 29.9% for estriol 0.1% cream and estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users, respectively. Satisfaction with applicators and ease of use were similar in both groups. There was a higher report of the product being 'messy' (38.0% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.026) and 'not hygienic' (48.9% vs. 18.2%; p < 0.001) by estriol 0.1% cream users compared to estradiol 10 μg vaginal insert users. Women aged <65 years demonstrated a greater concern about plastic use and the impact on the environment compared to women aged over 65 years (81.0% vs. 56.9%; p = 0.002). The younger cohort showed a preference for reusable applicators (66.2%) compared to single-use applicators (33.8%) (p = 0.005). There was no statistically significant difference in preference for women aged over 65 years.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that younger postmenopausal women showed greater concern for plastic waste and its impact on the environment, with a preference for reusable products. Manufacturers of health products and prescribers should be aware of this growing trend. With similar overall satisfaction and side-effect profiles, users should be made aware of the different types of applicators available to help support an informed decision.

从浪费到健康--女性的需求:深入了解患者对局部阴道雌激素涂抹器的看法和环境因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Climacteric
Climacteric 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
53
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Climacteric is the official journal of the International Menopause Society (IMS). As an international peer-reviewed journal it publishes original research and reviews of all aspects of aging in women. Climacteric was founded by the IMS in 1998 and today has become a leading journal in the publication of peer-reviewed papers on the menopause, climacteric and mid-life health. Topics covered include endocrine changes, symptoms attributed to the menopause and their treatment, hormone replacement and alternative therapies, lifestyles, and the counselling and education of peri- and postmenopausal women. Climacteric, published bimonthly, also features regular invited reviews, editorials and commentaries on recent developments. The editorial review board of Climacteric includes leading scientific and clinical experts in the field of midlife medicine and research and is headed by its Editor-in-Chief, Professor Rod Baber of Australia. He and his team of Associate Editors act independently to set a clear editorial policy, co-ordinate peer review, and ensure a rapid response to submitted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信