{"title":"Reclassification of <i>Bifidobacterium faecale</i> Choi <i>et al.</i> 2014 as a later heterotypic synonym of <i>Bifidobacterium adolescentis</i> Reuter 1963.","authors":"Shinnosuke Okuhama, Hidenori Takahashi, Yasunori Nakayama, Akihito Endo","doi":"10.1099/ijsem.0.006706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Bifidobacterium faecale</i> CU 3-7<sup>T</sup> (=JCM 19861<sup>T</sup>=KACC 17904<sup>T</sup>) was identified as a novel species primarily through phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene, heat shock protein 60 (<i>hsp60</i>) and <i>dnaJ1</i> sequences, and <i>in vitro</i> DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) compared to <i>Bifidobacterium adolescentis</i>. However, genome-based taxonomic approaches have not been studied yet. This study reassessed the taxonomic relationship between <i>B. faecale</i> and <i>B. adolescentis</i> using overall genome-associated indices. The type strains of the two species possessed heterogeneous copies of the 16S rRNA gene within their genomes, with similarities below the species threshold of 98.7-99.0%. Therefore, we were unable to assess the 16S rRNA gene similarity-based taxonomic relationships. This indicated that the 16S rRNA gene is not an appropriate marker for studying the taxonomy of <i>B. adolescentis</i>-associated taxa. The type strains exhibited an ortho average nucleotide identity uncorrected value of 97.7% and a digital DDH value of 80.7%, indicating that they should be assigned to a single taxon. A genome-based re-assessment indicated that <i>B. faecale</i> should be reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of <i>B. adolescentis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":14390,"journal":{"name":"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology","volume":"75 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.006706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bifidobacterium faecale CU 3-7T (=JCM 19861T=KACC 17904T) was identified as a novel species primarily through phylogenetic analyses of the 16S rRNA gene, heat shock protein 60 (hsp60) and dnaJ1 sequences, and in vitro DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) compared to Bifidobacterium adolescentis. However, genome-based taxonomic approaches have not been studied yet. This study reassessed the taxonomic relationship between B. faecale and B. adolescentis using overall genome-associated indices. The type strains of the two species possessed heterogeneous copies of the 16S rRNA gene within their genomes, with similarities below the species threshold of 98.7-99.0%. Therefore, we were unable to assess the 16S rRNA gene similarity-based taxonomic relationships. This indicated that the 16S rRNA gene is not an appropriate marker for studying the taxonomy of B. adolescentis-associated taxa. The type strains exhibited an ortho average nucleotide identity uncorrected value of 97.7% and a digital DDH value of 80.7%, indicating that they should be assigned to a single taxon. A genome-based re-assessment indicated that B. faecale should be reclassified as a later heterotypic synonym of B. adolescentis.
期刊介绍:
Published by the Microbiology Society and owned by the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes (ICSP), a committee of the Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology Division of the International Union of Microbiological Societies, International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology is the leading forum for the publication of novel microbial taxa and the ICSP’s official journal of record for prokaryotic names.
The journal welcomes high-quality research on all aspects of microbial evolution, phylogenetics and systematics, encouraging submissions on all prokaryotes, yeasts, microfungi, protozoa and microalgae across the full breadth of systematics including:
Identification, characterisation and culture preservation
Microbial evolution and biodiversity
Molecular environmental work with strong taxonomic or evolutionary content
Nomenclature
Taxonomy and phylogenetics.